| 3 years ago :: Aug 21, 2010 - 11:54AM #111 | |
|
Solf, believe what you want. You will anyway, and at least your not hurting anyone in the process.
However, we cannot have a philosophical discussion with you on this topic, not because we are unwilling to have a philosophical discussion about it, but because you are unwilling to have a philosophical discussion about it. You want to just lecture us on the errors of our ways, and are so convinced of your own correctness that you don't listen to other opinions.
Sure people get into veganism because they are convinced that it is more healthy. They may even become more healthy than they were. Causation does not imply correlation however. They become more healthy because they improved their diet, not because they cut out meat entirely. They become more healthy because they start exercising as part of improving the whole. They become more healthy because they were unhealthy before, and started making choices to allow them to become more healthy instead of sitting on the couch munching Doritos and watching reruns of 'American Idol'.
There is a correlation between increasing activity levels, improving diet, and increasing health. There is a correlation between reducing fatty cured meat consumption and health. There is not a correlation between cutting out meat completely and health. There is a gray area. Cutting out animal products completely is an ethical choice.
all
Yesterday, in America, 100 million gun owners did nothing.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Aug 22, 2010 - 3:22AM #112 | |
|
I've been reading this with interest. Like many things, there are those that do and those that don't. Those who don't tend to try to convert those who do and tell them why they are so bad and shouldn't be able to sleep at night. My feeling is that anything in moderation is a good thing. We should treat all with respect, animals, vegetables and more importantly, each other. Yes, we need protein to survive. Our ancestors ate meat. They also ate a lot of other things. Yes, we can survive on no meat. We are adaptable. We also have brains. We should use them. God gave them to us for a reason you know. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Aug 22, 2010 - 9:28AM #113 | |
|
Indeed ... My own Diet includes fairly SMALL Portions of Animal Protein ...
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Aug 22, 2010 - 10:44AM #114 | |
|
Yes, we can survive on no meat. We are adaptable. We also have brains. We should use them. God gave them to us for a reason you know. Yes, we have brains. With the brains we can think, unlike the animals. We can understand empathy, respect for life, etc. We should definitely use them and not be slaves to our animal's habits. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Aug 28, 2010 - 8:18AM #115 | |
|
This thread has been moved from Hot Topics Zone. Local guidelines will apply to any posts going forward. --- agnosticspirit - Bnet community cohost HTZ
Tribalism, ethnocentricism, racism, nationalism, and FEAR is the Mind Killer... >:(
For user to user support and to look up the latest glitch reports, check the Beliefnet Knowledgebase by clicking on the link below! Beliefnet Knowledgebase |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Sep 01, 2010 - 4:03PM #116 | |
|
It amazes me how strongly people can cling to an ignorance of basic biology.
We are clearly omnivores. Our teeth, eyes, digestive system, enzymes all proclaim that fact. So do our tapeworms, which document an unbroken vegetarian practice by hominids for at least 750,000 years - at least four times as long as we have been us! This new data pushes the date back a bit, that's all. It's not really surprising since meat eating has been identified in almost all larger primates. Among other things, the fats are good for building those big brains we were busy evolving.
---------------------------------------------------------
What part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn" do you not understand? --------------------------------------------------------- XKCD: Communion |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Oct 24, 2010 - 9:17PM #117 | |
|
and it matters why? aren't humans supposed to have evolved from 3.5 million years ago? Still savages? How savage do you feel at that drive-thru? Give me a break. What humans did 3.5 million years ago has nothing to do with industrial widespread animal cruelty on factory farms where machines kill animals, not humans, not Ms. Peabody down the street, not you, not any one, because humans find killing repulsive. If killing is such a great important part of human nature, how come 99% of all humans don't kill? This is a wake-up call, our species finds killing, blood and guts to be repulsive, thus you can logically conclude that killing and eating animals will become a thing of the past. In fact, since machines are doing all of the killing for you, really killingis already banished from our species. The fact remains, we have feelings. Those feelings make us feel awful when we hurt some one else. Thus we refrain from doing so! Ta da! Now just allow that pea sized brain to realize that just because you aren't there at the slaughterhouse doesn't make the killing any less repulsive, cruel, and repugnant. Feelings, use them. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Dec 01, 2010 - 2:19AM #118 | |
|
I wonder if we could develop a religious requirement a la the Islamic duty to visit Mecca once in every Muslim's life, in which every human is required to visit the source of their food(s) at least once in their life - from farm to mill or slaughterhouse (or from chemical plant to food processing plant). People should know where their food comes from. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|