1.) Abortion (Unless you're trying to argue abortion v. pregnancy instead of abortion v. childbirth. Then that'd be another thing all together).

2.) The unborn have a right to an abortion? What about men? If not, then that kinda' undercuts the whole "abortion as a human right" claim, as a right not afforded to all humans isn't much of a human right. Plus, accepting that abortion is a human right, you'd get into the whole "Why the unborn have a 'right' to an abortion but not a right to not be killed?" thing.

rather than arguing over which is riskier, why can't we do a better job of making pregnancy and childbirth safer? oh wait, because abortion is easier on everyone else who isn't the woman. her problem. leave her to it. so much for equality.

but for those who think it's no big deal that women are harmed by abortion:

www.abortioninjury.com/

www.silentnomoreawareness.org/

www.lifedynamics.com/Abortion_Prolife/Ab...

we can recall Toyota cars but God forbid we hold Planned Parenthood accountable for botched abortions and illegal activity.

Choice is a misnomer, not simply because it's used in order to denote "freedom", and not even because it ignores what's being chosen, but because said people who hide behind the choice moniker won't extend that thought process to everything (Because, if they did, they'd quickly realize how asinine it is to allow people to do to another as they please according to their own wills).

...And abortion is only "complicated" because one side wants to make it complicated. It's actually fairly simple.

No. My simplistic black-and-white thinking is due to the fact that I typically skip over obfuscations and the sort (And my argument wouldn't be more-or-less valid if I were a female. Seriously. That's such a crappy argument, it's kind of amazing why people continue to use it). There's nothing worse then people who unecessarily overcomplicate an issue just because they can. It's annoying, least because it attempts to talk around the point. Anyway, on that note:

1.) You can be anti-war if you want. Just make sure that everyone else is anti-war, as well.

2.) The idea of "personal sovereignty over your body" is a total, complete and utter non-issue, as no one has complete control over their own body. Absolutely no one. And I can sit here and list at least twenty different instances of things you cannot do to and with your body that aren't exactly protested by the people who go on and on and on about "sovereignty".

3.) Sexual freedom = Freedom from responsibility? 'Cuz, ugh, that's pretty much what abortion is, as it kills that to which one would be responsible (Plus, the argument doesn't work for a man, and it would probably get him laughed out of court if he were to employ it).

4.) I'm not so sure what the statement "life-long commitments to another person's welfare, adoption, finances, etc" is supposed to mean, but at any rate people aren't parents, nor are they held to certain obligations, necessarily because they want to be. Indeed, the law often time-- What's that word?-- "Forces" people to provide some manner of care for someone else even if they don't want to.