| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 2:39AM #1 | |
For first time in 15 years of Gallup polling, ‘pro-choice’ is overtaken
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 7:24AM #2 | |
|
1015 people.... Yeah... THAT's enough to say "All Americans"... I mean, there's only millions of us. Gallup should actually poll AMERICA. 1000 people in EACH STATE.... but, can't do that... the right wing might lose their footing if a survey of ACTUAL Americans was done.
James Thurber - "It is better to know some of the questions than all of the answers."
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 9:27AM #3 | |
That was sad news for the future of women.... but the poll was biased and it's methodology was flawed. That wouldn't be so bad, but the methodology was flawed on purpose. It was a dishonest survey ment to come up with dishonest results.
Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.
I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 9:43AM #4 | |
|
One of the things that strikes me about the survey is that the greatest increase in "pro-life" views is among people 50 and older. People in this age group have no personal need for abortion; the issue may not hit home for them at that age like it may have when they were in their 20s. It's easier to take a more hardline stand on an issues when there's no chance the issue will affect you directly (I think we also see this in the greater percentage of men v. women who take a PL stance). I just saw a report on ABC evening news a few nights ago that stated that 40% of births in the US today are to single women. The report stated that the increase is not among teens, but among women in their 20s and 30s. Women in their 20s have been a group with high abortion rates, compared to women in other age groups, if I recall correctly. I wonder if the abortion rate among them has gone down. The ABC report also mentioned that many of the "single" women were cohabiting, and their partners were basically functioning as dads. I wonder how much of the increase in single moms is due to women making more money, and whether their financial security makes them more likely to continue an unintended pregnancy. Abortion rates have always been high among people with less financial means. With the increasing prosperity of the 90s and early 00s, abortion rates went down. Perhaps the slight drop in support for legal abortion is somehow related. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 11:45AM #5 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 11:48AM #6 | |
|
Does this possible increase in opposition to abortion go along with increased opposition to birth control? In some circles I have seen this poll touted as a victory for the prurient morality of the Religious Right. I wonder if that is true.
This post contains no advertisements or solicitations.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 12:00PM #7 | |
|
Wondering how the results would pan out if the questions were posed much more directly to reflect the individual "self" and the "public-at-large"? Are you "pro-life" for "your own individual self"? Are you "pro-life" for women in the "public sphere"? ****** Are you "pro-choice" for "your own individual self"? Are you "pro-choice" for women in the "public sphere"? ****** That's only a start but maybe then the numbers would be more telling.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 12:08PM #8 | |
|
The only polls that really matter are opened every two years or so and send people to legislatures and Congress. That said I would be very interested in knowing a breakdown of how many of those that said they want abortion legal in some cases would favor specific legislation and what pattern that would take. One of the prevailing weaknesses in the PL camp has been an unwillingness os a substantial number to compromise on limited restriction of abortion. For instance limiting abortion to medical need after 13 or 14 weeks and then defining medical need clearly yet flexibly. My opposition to legal restriction of abortion rests more on my lack of faith in the legislatures and Congress to do such a nuanced job. They have NEVER succeeded in the past, why expect it now.
"Not all who wander are lost" J.R.R.Tolkein
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do. ~Anne Lamott "Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain." Friedrich von Schiller |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 12:42PM #9 | |
I think those questions have already been answered by the fact that fewer people believe abortion should legal as when compared to those who believe it should be illegal. In fact, there's been a slight decrease in the number of people who believe abortion should always be legal and a slight increase in the number of people who believe that abortion should always be illegal. The support for abortion is mostly conditional. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 4 years ago :: May 16, 2009 - 6:55PM #10 | |
Of COURSE the 50 and over set are pro life... THEY aren't the ones getting stuck with kids they don't want! Some of them might get grandkids to raise, but the vast majority will only have grandkids occasionally. THEY don't have to raise the unwanted kids.
James Thurber - "It is better to know some of the questions than all of the answers."
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|