John Terry spoke out against Coach Fabio Capello about his frustration in the team spirit and tactics.

Why is it called a mutiny? I don't think that it is fair to label it as such because it seems that Terry is frustrated and cannot take it any longer. I believe that Fabio Capello is leading the team with an iron fist. No one is allowed to voice their opinion and he lays out the law of the land without getting advise from his team.

I am seeing that the team is underperforming because they are suffocated and that is horrible for the moral of the players. Wayne Rooney is an amazing striker but Capello is clamping down on him and is not allowing him to play in his natural position as a sole striker, and that is not just it, he criticizes Rooney for not performing well. Is this fair, asking the impossible of your players and then citicizing them for not performing well?

Mutiny brings a very negative connotation with it and it does not reflect the story behind it. I believe that Terry, as a leader in the team, has a duty of protecting himself from a stubborn and strict coach and to protect his teammates from undue criticism.

I believe that a new word that is more reflective of the situation needs to be created. What Terry did is protect himself. I think that is important for him to do it.

Hi SW,

Thanks for the link, and I just read your spain prediction and I hope that they reach the final instead.

As for my creativity, thanks for the kind words. However at this stage of my depression I do not think I am fully able to apply it. I know that I have it, thanks to my strong educational background (when I wasn't this depressed) that allowed me to explore what I liked and what I disliked. I wonder if I will see more of my creativity.

Bye for now

Hanna