Post Reply
Page 3 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Federal Court Finds DOMA Unconstitutional
1 year ago  ::  Feb 24, 2012 - 11:31AM #21
Girlchristian
Posts: 9,469

DOMA is unconstitutional and it never should have been signed into law by Clinton no matter what his reasoning was. IMO, it's one of the biggest failures of Clinton's presidency that he didn't stand his ground, do what's right, and refuse to sign it into law.

"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris

“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 24, 2012 - 2:22PM #22
TemplarS
Posts: 5,161

Feb 24, 2012 -- 11:31AM, Girlchristian wrote:


DOMA is unconstitutional and it never should have been signed into law by Clinton no matter what his reasoning was. IMO, it's one of the biggest failures of Clinton's presidency that he didn't stand his ground, do what's right, and refuse to sign it into law.





Morally, this is right.


But things have changed immensely in 15 years.  In 1996 when DOMA was passed, there was a poll showing that 68% of the American public opposed same-sex marriage.  Now, 53% support it.  I don't care how moral your position is, it is not reasonable to expect any politician to support something opposed by 68% of his constituents.


Remember, DADT, when it was put into effect around the same time, was seen as a step forward for gays.  Now it is in the dustbin as obsolete.  I'm sure gays do not see this evolution as fast at all; but, by political and cultural standards, it is. 


This is why I am optimisitic for the future. Given the increasing acceptance of gays by the young, there is every reason to expect this trend to continue.  Fifteen years hence, we will look back on the current mess surrounding referendums and court cases and shake our heads. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 24, 2012 - 2:22PM #23
mainecaptain
Posts: 20,478

Feb 23, 2012 -- 11:53PM, Ebon wrote:


Feb 22, 2012 -- 7:08PM, Rgurley4 wrote:

Does anything conservative NOW come out of California? Their memory of Reagan  is fading.



Sadly, not fast enough.




Agreed.

A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato..
"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 24, 2012 - 4:13PM #24
Girlchristian
Posts: 9,469

Feb 24, 2012 -- 2:22PM, TemplarS wrote:


Feb 24, 2012 -- 11:31AM, Girlchristian wrote:


DOMA is unconstitutional and it never should have been signed into law by Clinton no matter what his reasoning was. IMO, it's one of the biggest failures of Clinton's presidency that he didn't stand his ground, do what's right, and refuse to sign it into law.





Morally, this is right.


But things have changed immensely in 15 years.  In 1996 when DOMA was passed, there was a poll showing that 68% of the American public opposed same-sex marriage.  Now, 53% support it.  I don't care how moral your position is, it is not reasonable to expect any politician to support something opposed by 68% of his constituents.


I guess I look at it differently and would no matter what party the president was at the time. If 68% of the public supported making slavery legal again, we wouldn't excuse a politician that signed it into law as 'just doing what his constituents wanted.' To look at it another way, the extreme religious right politicians are just doing what their constituents want when they oppose same-sex marriage and abortion and yet we condemn them for doing so.


Remember, DADT, when it was put into effect around the same time, was seen as a step forward for gays.  Now it is in the dustbin as obsolete.  I'm sure gays do not see this evolution as fast at all; but, by political and cultural standards, it is. 


This is why I am optimisitic for the future. Given the increasing acceptance of gays by the young, there is every reason to expect this trend to continue.  Fifteen years hence, we will look back on the current mess surrounding referendums and court cases and shake our heads. 


Completely agree.





"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris

“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 24, 2012 - 5:06PM #25
TemplarS
Posts: 5,161

I will admit that 15 year ago same-sex marriage was not something I really paid much attention to.  I didn't know many gay people so there was no personal connection.  I would not have considered myself a bigot, since I supported gay equality in a lot of things, and DADT made sense to me at the time as a sensible step forward.  As far as same sex marriage is concerned, I was not against it, but I also thought that marriage being the usual way society organized its social structure, there was really nothing wrong with society setting such standards and rules as it saw fit.  I don't remember what I thought specifically about DOMA at the time, but I surely do not remember being offended by Clinton signing the bill.  So I am not going to take the high horse here and moralize about what others did or did not do at the time.  I think a lot of other folks who now support same-sex marriage were in the same boat at the time.  But times change.


I will say that as much as anything it was my children who made me understand things differently.  They had gay friends, accepted them openly and accepted their relationships openly, and kept prompting me with these questions as to why they should not be treated equally under the law in everything.  I'm proud of them, and they (to borrow an old expression) raised my consciousness. 


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 26, 2012 - 2:07PM #26
Do_unto_others
Posts: 6,266

Feb 23, 2012 -- 1:14AM, mytmouse57 wrote:


All of these gay marriage ban attempts will eventually be ruled unconstitutional.





Re: "eventually"


Justice delayed is justice denied.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 26, 2012 - 2:11PM #27
Ken
Posts: 33,801

Feb 26, 2012 -- 2:07PM, Do_unto_others wrote:


Feb 23, 2012 -- 1:14AM, mytmouse57 wrote:


All of these gay marriage ban attempts will eventually be ruled unconstitutional.





Re: "eventually"


Justice delayed is justice denied.



Exactly. Think of all the people for whom it will come too late.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 26, 2012 - 3:25PM #28
mountain_man
Posts: 34,136

Feb 26, 2012 -- 2:11PM, Ken wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 2:07PM, Do_unto_others wrote:

Re: "eventually"


Justice delayed is justice denied.


Exactly. Think of all the people for whom it will come too late.


That's pretty much a nonsense term made up by those wanting the death penalty to be carried out the day ofter kangaroo trial. It is already too late for the billions of homosexuals that have been around since humans evolved.

Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.

I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 27, 2012 - 11:03AM #29
Do_unto_others
Posts: 6,266

Feb 26, 2012 -- 3:25PM, mountain_man wrote:


Feb 26, 2012 -- 2:11PM, Ken wrote:

Feb 26, 2012 -- 2:07PM, Do_unto_others wrote:

Re: "eventually"


Justice delayed is justice denied.


Exactly. Think of all the people for whom it will come too late.


That's pretty much a nonsense term made up by those wanting the death penalty to be carried out the day ofter kangaroo trial. It is already too late for the billions of homosexuals that have been around since humans evolved.





mm, I've never heard the term applied to speedy executions, ever. I'm speaking of justice, and I do not believe the death penalty delivers justice - ever.


But yes, it is already too late for those who have gone before us, many at the hands of homophobes.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 27, 2012 - 11:45AM #30
mountain_man
Posts: 34,136

Feb 27, 2012 -- 11:03AM, Do_unto_others wrote:

mm, I've never heard the term applied to speedy executions, ever.


I've heard it quite often from death penalty supporters. They are upset that "justice" takes so long.


I'm speaking of justice, and I do not believe the death penalty delivers justice - ever.


Death penalty supporters invented that phrase. Justice takes time. If done quickly it never ends up being justice. The truth gets set aside in order to make things go faster.


But yes, it is already too late for those who have gone before us, many at the hands of homophobes.


And it is going to take more time. A society cannot change over night. Yes, it is taking too long and it's going to take longer still since there is still some fight left in the homophobes. I'm not saying to give up on the fight, but to be pragmatic about it; it's going to take some time.

Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.

I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook