Post Reply
Page 3 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3
Switch to Forum Live View Obama orders hospitals to grant same-sex couples visitation rights
3 years ago  ::  Apr 18, 2010 - 4:59PM #21
Stardove
Posts: 12,807

My thoughts are this will apply especially when a person is in ICU or in a coma or unconscious.


When a person is awake anyone he or she wants to visit can.  ICU visits have been normally restricted to family only.  This will change that injustice.


I went to see a male friend in the hospital in a regular room.  When the oncologist came into the room she told him he had stage four cancer.  Then she turned to me, and asked if I was his wife.  I replied, "no" and said I would step out of the room.  Even in the hallway I could hear what she had to say to my friend. 


My friend only lived one month after receiving the news and choosing not to have any treatment.  Frown 


I lost two male friends in March two days apart.  Both had stage 4 lung cancer as the initial diagnosis.

Beliefnet Community Wide Moderator ~ Peace Love Stardove
Problems? Send a message to Beliefnet_community

Nothing but your own thoughts can hamper your progress.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Apr 18, 2010 - 7:54PM #22
Brownowl33
Posts: 443

Apr 18, 2010 -- 4:23PM, mainecaptain wrote:


Apr 18, 2010 -- 2:30PM, sydneymoon wrote:


 


Yes, that I do understand. That's not really what I meant. That folks are so consumed with hate is hard for me to understand.



I don't get it either. So much hate towards people who have never done them any harm. Towards total strangers. Mind boggling




Unfortunately, it's not hard for me to understand at all.  Hating gays is still big business for many Fundamentalist Christians.  The huge Baptist church here in Dallas (hardly a tiny podunk town) recently had a month long sermon series called "Why Gay is Not OK" where the pastor lectured people on how evil gays were supposed to be.    Because of their "saved" versus "unsaved" nonsense, they view anyone who's different then they are as evil; since gays are visibly different, it's easy to attack them.  I think religion in general tends to thrive on fear, ignorance, and hysteria and blaming gays is an easy way to drum up some income for the church ("we've got to stop their "gay agenda!"  Give generously!")  It also reinforces their us versus them mentality, and persecution delusions.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Apr 18, 2010 - 11:05PM #23
Stardove
Posts: 12,807

Apr 18, 2010 -- 7:54PM, Brownowl33 wrote:



Unfortunately, it's not hard for me to understand at all.  Hating gays is still big business for many Fundamentalist Christians.  The huge Baptist church here in Dallas (hardly a tiny podunk town) recently had a month long sermon series called "Why Gay is Not OK" where the pastor lectured people on how evil gays were supposed to be.    Because of their "saved" versus "unsaved" nonsense, they view anyone who's different then they are as evil; since gays are visibly different, it's easy to attack them.  I think religion in general tends to thrive on fear, ignorance, and hysteria and blaming gays is an easy way to drum up some income for the church ("we've got to stop their "gay agenda!"  Give generously!")  It also reinforces their us versus them mentality, and persecution delusions.




I will close my mouth now.  Those that do pray should pray for the pastor and members of the First Baptist Church of Dallas to follow the teaching of love one another.  IMO!


At least the Grace United Methodist Church pastor has grace.


The pastor of little Grace United Methodist Church took a swipe at big First Baptist Church of Dallas on Sunday with a sermon titled "Why Gay Is OK."

The message was delivered as a counterpunch to "Why Gay Is Not OK," a November sermon by First Baptist pastor Dr. Robert Jeffress.

 "I knew I had to preach about this," the Rev. Diana Holbert said Sunday.

She told her diverse East Dallas congregation that homosexuality is not a big issue in the Bible and that Christians should be more focused on subjects such as health care, greed in the corporate world, and the welfare of children.

About a third of the church's membership is gay or lesbian, she said.



More at link.

Beliefnet Community Wide Moderator ~ Peace Love Stardove
Problems? Send a message to Beliefnet_community

Nothing but your own thoughts can hamper your progress.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Apr 19, 2010 - 12:19AM #24
k-bearsmom
Posts: 1,716

I am..what most of you would call...a fundamental Christian.


I have never understood this 'regulation/exclusion' of the ability for gays to visit thier loved ones!


In our hospitals here, just about anyone may visit a patient without showing any 'creds'...just as long as it's during the set hours!


Can anyone here inform us as to how-when-and why this rule ever was put into place? Surely it was'nt a religious thing on the part of the hospitals?


And I too, applaud the president's order!

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Apr 19, 2010 - 7:43AM #25
Beautiful_Dreamer
Posts: 4,933

My brother and his partner have been together for about 30 years...almost as long as I've been alive.  From what I understand, they've been treated well in their home state of Hawaii, but I find it really stupid that a presidential order has to be made so that people in their position would be able to visit each other in the hospital and make other health-care proxy decisions.  I've said it before and I'll say it again, I think hateful or bigoted people are miserable in their own lives and want to make sure everyone else is too. I understand that there are difficulties (like the ones Erey outlines), but it's definitely an overdue step in the right direction!!!


Rangerken, I am *so* happy to hear someone say what you did re: not supporting Obama normally but commending him when he does the right thing.  But then, I respect you greatly anyway.  I don't understand why judging a president's performance on an action-by-action basis regarding things like this is such a foreign concept to so many people nowadays, but it's great to see people here who don't fall into lockstep with that.

More where that came from...

A new-ish forum for women

Beliefnet Community Host - Christian Faith and Life, Christian to Christian Debate
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Apr 20, 2010 - 11:37AM #26
Do_unto_others
Posts: 6,274

Apr 19, 2010 -- 12:19AM, k-bearsmom wrote:


I am..what most of you would call...a fundamental Christian.


I have never understood this 'regulation/exclusion' of the ability for gays to visit thier loved ones!


In our hospitals here, just about anyone may visit a patient without showing any 'creds'...just as long as it's during the set hours!


Can anyone here inform us as to how-when-and why this rule ever was put into place? Surely it was'nt a religious thing on the part of the hospitals?


And I too, applaud the president's order!






 


Let me attempt to answer your question, Mom. Gay people in America are legal strangers. It came about for many reasons and the so-called "Defense" of Marriage Act in large part reinforces that status. Since we legally aren't "family", the actual (read blood relatives) family can eradicate our relationships before the lw. "Family" wishes take precedence.


 


I believe this largely came about because of the overlarge influence of traditional fundamentalist religionists and their view of gays. (Don't ever forget the Bible tells them that gay people "shall surely be put to death".)


 


Unless and until the DOMA is overturned and gays gain full and equal access to society's institution of marriage, this is unlikely to change. And there hasn't even been a lawyer smart enough to come forward and insist that the U.S. Constitution's Full Faith & Credit Clause (the one that says that a contract that is legally binding in one State shoulud be legally binding in ALL States) should apply equally to gay citizens. Nevermind the Equal Protections Clause. Nevermind the "LIBERTY and JUSTICE for ALL" dictum. Nevermind the right to the pursuit of happiness.


 


Gays in general are excluded for so much of society and its institutions, and I largely blame religious prejudice. Just listen to most of the 'arguments' made (both in the courts AND here): "But it's a SIN!!!" and you'll understand what I am talking about.


 


Thanx 4 askin'.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Apr 20, 2010 - 11:47AM #27
Do_unto_others
Posts: 6,274

"Surely it was'nt a religious thing on the part of the hospitals?"


 


Unfortunately, it very much is (or was until recently). I am a Deacon in my Church, and I cannot tell you the number of times that I would have to, er, 'ask' hospital staff to allow access to a same-sex partner. Sad to say, more often than not, the hospitals in which this occurred (yes it occurred more than once and in more than one hospital) were 'religious' hospitals. [I would have typed 'Catholic', since the vast majority of them were Catholic hospitals, but that would just raise charges of Catholic-bashing, when instead I merely am typing what actually occurred.]


 


When religions can get away with gay-bashing (like, you know, Hurricane Katrina [etc.] were caused by gays, or America's so-called "embrace" of its gay citizens - thank you 'reverend' Jerry Falsewell), with saying acting on one's innate sexual orientation is "intrinsically disordered", with linking child-molestation with homosexuality - as a RCC Cardinal did just last week - then yes, it very much was/IS a "religious thing".


 


Sad, innit?


 


Or haven't you actually heard/read some of the things the 'religious' get away with saying about God's gay and lesbian children?

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook