| 5 years ago :: Oct 20, 2008 - 12:20PM #31 | |
|
[QUOTE=redroses098;837065]In Ezekiel 16 God did mention in a single verse that Sodom was 'inhospitable' to the poor (along with committing many other crimes), but look at the entire chapter and read it in context. More than the fist half is God telling Jerusalem that she's a whore who's betrayed Him. Then He went one further and said she was just like her 'sisters' Samaria and Sodom (who were destroyed), only worse. Sorry, but simple inhospitably doesn't invite that kind of wrath.[/QUOTE]
Let's see, which is more harmful... A. Refusing hospitality to strangers in a desert land where inhospitality could essentially kill someone. B. Two men sharing a loving relationship. Gee, I wonder what it could be. EDIT: I'd also like to add that God decided to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah LONG before the people of Sodom tried to gang rape the angels. In fact, that's why Abram tried to argue with Him about it. Sorry, but context-wise, there is no way that it could be homosexuality, even if you believe that rape and a loving relationship are somehow the same thing. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Oct 20, 2008 - 12:32PM #32 | |
|
Honestly, the type of "marraige" being discussed here isn't even recognized by the church when it concerns two straight people who have never been married before and intend to be together forever. The state is talking about civil marraiges, and the civil rights that come along with those marraiges. And if I remember my constitution, civil rights are to be extended to all people regardless of race or creed...well, believing that homosexuality is acceptable is a creed that does not interfere with other peoples liberties, and as such is protected under freedom of religion.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Oct 24, 2008 - 3:49PM #33 | |
|
[QUOTE=Zachguy18;837932]Let's see, which is more harmful...
A. Refusing hospitality to strangers in a desert land where inhospitality could essentially kill someone. B. Two men sharing a loving relationship. Gee, I wonder what it could be. EDIT: I'd also like to add that God decided to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah LONG before the people of Sodom tried to gang rape the angels. In fact, that's why Abram tried to argue with Him about it. Sorry, but context-wise, there is no way that it could be homosexuality, even if you believe that rape and a loving relationship are somehow the same thing.[/QUOTE] Someone who has actually read the Bible account...and understands it !!! Whooo hooo.... Very refreshing, Zach guy! (BTW, even the gang rape scenario is also doubtful... the phrase "to know them" was used both to mean "to know" or "had marital sex with". If it is the first...then it is the "hospitality" (as in torture your guests kind...) thing... if it is the latter, then it would have been saying that the entire city wanted to marry the angels and have sex with them. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Oct 24, 2008 - 6:32PM #34 | |
|
[QUOTE=robinsgarret;848227]Someone who has actually read the Bible account...and understands it !!! Whooo hooo....
Very refreshing, Zach guy! (BTW, even the gang rape scenario is also doubtful... the phrase "to know them" was used both to mean "to know" or "had marital sex with". If it is the first...then it is the "hospitality" (as in torture your guests kind...) thing... if it is the latter, then it would have been saying that the entire city wanted to marry the angels and have sex with them.[/QUOTE] I say gang-rape because it's not too far of a leap from the common interpretation, but still identifies it as something entirely different from the common interpretation... i.e., sex vs. rape. Gang-rape or torture, it was still most undeniably inhospitable, and in a desert environment where hospitality can save someone's life, it is truly detestable to do such a thing.. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Oct 26, 2008 - 9:14PM #35 | |
|
Good discussion gentlemen. Yes, the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were surely a nasty lot but how many of them were living in faithful, committed same sex relationships?
Peace - Mareczku |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Nov 13, 2008 - 2:33PM #36 | |
|
[QUOTE=redroses098;834675]Uh…I think you’ve got some issues, and I’m not getting into that here. My explanation was entirely reasonable and has nothing to do with ‘control’. Sorry you feel that way.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|