Post Reply
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 8:41AM #1
JRT
Posts: 309

Shafia murders: Fatwa issued against honour killings, domestic violence, hatred of women.



 


Toronto Star newspaper


 


Muslim clerics in Canada issued a fatwa on Saturday against honour killings, domestic violence and hatred of women. "These crimes are major sins in Islam, punishable by the court of law and almighty Allah," said Prof. Imam Syed Soharwardy, representing 34 clerics affiliated with the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada. The announcement was made at a news conference in Mississauga, on the eve of Eid Milad un Nabi, which Muslims celebrate as the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad.


 


The fatwa — a morally binding religious edict — was issued by the ISCC in the wake of a quadruple-murder trial involving a polygamous Muslim-Canadian family living in Montreal. Mohammad Shafia and Tooba Yahya were convicted and sentenced to life in prison last week for drowning their three daughters and Shafia’s first wife in what they regarded as an honour killing. Their adult son, Hamed Shafia, was also sentenced to life for his role in the murders. The youngest victim was 13.


 


The Muslim community in Canada was deeply saddened by the murders and stung by comments online and in the press tarring all Muslims with the same brush, Soharwardy said yesterday. "We love this country. We love this land. This is our land, too," he said. It was the third fatwa issued by the ISCC in 10 years, according to Soharwardy. The first was against the Taliban when it forbade girls from attending school. The second was against terrorism after 911.


 


The most famous fatwa is perhaps the one issued against Salman Rushdie by Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989. The author of The Satanic Verses spent nearly a decade in hiding, fearing for his life from Muslim extremists.


 


But a fatwa is not a call to violence, it is a reminder to the community of the teachings of the Qur’an, said Soharwardy. In this case, it is a reminder that Muslim men are not superior to Muslim women and should deal with family discord gently and with love and kindness. He said the fatwa was issued for three audiences — for the minority of Muslims who believe in honour killings; to remind Muslim parents their role is to educate, inform and model good behaviour to their children and not use force to instill religious beliefs; and to Canadians who point to the Shafia family as somehow being representative of Muslims. "It is wrong in Islam to force someone to follow what you think Islam is," said Soharwardy.

the floggings will continue until morale improves
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 05, 2012 - 2:30PM #2
REteach
Posts: 13,195

Wasn't it Oklahoma that tried to ban Sharia law. So the fatwah against honor killings presumably couldn't be honored there...

I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize what you heard was not what I meant...
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Feb 16, 2012 - 9:47PM #3
Mlyons619
Posts: 15,664

That's okay.  I'm sure the Oklahoma State Penn has plenty of room for those Islamic daddies who ignore fatwas (and state laws) against murdering girl relatives.  I do believe Oklahoma still employs ole' Sparky...

"No freedom without education"
            --Thomas Jefferson
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 13, 2012 - 11:57PM #4
jesusfreakgal
Posts: 896

The hard thing with people (probably usually men of islam, though not all, rather then women) who are muslim and immigrate to north america is this: They immigrate their family to north america, and sometimes pretty much expect their family maybe mostly the daughters/ women to act as though they were still in the country they came from. For daughters in school, this is especially difficult when they may be learning things that may be contrary to that. It would be difficult for a student to learn one thing at school (that isn't immoral, bad, wrong or actually saying anything about any religion at least not in a remotely bad way), and be pretty much told the opposite at school. It would be like a school banning head coverings (like muslim women wear) for a particular good reason having nothing to do with religion, and having the students parents REQUIRE (as in say, they get into trouble at home if they don't, such as being grounded or what not) they wear it at all times, at least when not at home. How can the student follow both. At school they could get suspended or a detension and at home they'd also be punished. It would be a lose lose situation. I believe that when one immigrates to a new country, whether or not they have children (but particularly if they do), they can't expect to live (even behaviour and sometime dress wise) or have their children live just exactly as they did where they came from (regardless of the country they came from or religion even). Suppose someone comes from a very catholic country where citizines were required to go to mass every morning (I doubt that exists, but still). Suppose where they move to morning mass at ALL catholic churches interfeared with the start of school. Parents could still expect their child to go to mass every morning, but doing so in the new country would get them in trouble at school. One has to realize that when they move to a new country, things will change, and sometimes not in a way that one would like.


JFG

Quick Reply
Cancel
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook