| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 1:45PM #201 | |
|
Howdy Solf Even vegan diets are not without their drawbacks. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/02/11...
ScienceDaily (Feb. 15, 2011) — People who follow a vegan lifestyle -- strict vegetarians who try to eat no meat or animal products of any kind -- may increase their risk of developing blood clots and atherosclerosis or "hardening of the arteries," which are conditions that can lead to heart attacks and stroke. That's the conclusion of a review of dozens of articles published on the biochemistry of vegetarianism during the past 30 years. I think we can all agree that what to eat and not to eat is a complex subject.
There are many different factors to consider. I also think that what a person eats or doesn't eat is their choice.
HAVE A THINKING DAY MAY REASON GUIDE YOU
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 1:57PM #202 | |
Thanks for sharing! I was never able to go vegan, despite trying several times. Due to a bladder condition, I can no longer have soy (for whatever reason, it aggravates the condition) so I pretty much avoid all the "fake" meat products even though I used to love them! Like you, diabetes runs in my family so I exercise and monitor my sugar. I've never even tested high so I'm doing okay. I'm 5'8" and 130 pounds so being overweight wouldn't be a concern for me either.
"No matter how dark the moment, love and hope are always possible." George Chakiris
“For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.” Stuart Chase |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 2:24PM #203 | |
Yes, we did. Cows were domesticated somewhere between 9,000 and 11,000 years ago and we have been evolving ever since then. Evolution doesn't just stop.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 2:38PM #204 | |
|
Ebon wrote: > Yes, we did. Cows were domesticated somewhere between 9,000 and 11,000 years > ago and we have been evolving ever since then. Evolution doesn't just stop. Interestingly, scientists have found that the lactose-tolerance genes in humans evolved on three separate occasions and have rapidly spread through large sections of the human population since then. This indicates that lactose tolerance is a very valuable positive trait - that it very much helps the survival of people who have it. Also interestingly, human gene variants have also been showing up that make the carriers basically immune to the effects of high-cholesterol diets ... and yes, they're spreading too, though they haven't gotten as far yet. There are also some small populations who have adapted to a diet that is extremely high in meat, even fat (such as the Inuit). As you say, evolution just doesn't stop. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 6:13PM #205 | |
|
Everybody is being reasonable, which is good. Where animal rights are concerned, I can get kind of weird at times, so I apologise if people thought I was rude in previous posts. You might say I was just being emphatic whilst trying to make a point. What I should have been saying was that I hate the act but not the person. As Heretic pointed out, we all follow our own path in life, and we all carry our own baggage. I freely admit that I follow 'the road not taken' most of the time. Anyway, it's true that humans keep on evolving, and that certain groups have, indeed, managed to evolve to the point where they can consume the milk of other species without adverse effects. But, it is also true that milk really is an infant food, and it is true that humans are the only species that feels the need to use milk after infancy, or that uses the milk of another species. It's also true that most of us are lactose intolerant because we lack the enzyme lactase to break down lactose. And, as some of the other links I cited earlier show, dairy consumption has been linked to various illnesses. Generally speaking, cow's milk isn't the ideal food product the dairy industry would have you believe. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 9:13PM #206 | |
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21204526 Now note that this paper is about biomarkers of disease risk, not incidence of disease. The clearest link between a vegan diet and an abnormality in a biomarker is B12, since this vitamin is difficult (but not impossible) to obtain via purely plant sources. Yet we do not see vegans routinely succumbing to pernicious anemia, the consequence of B12 deficiency. There have indeed been some case reports, especially in infants breastfed by B12-deficient mothers, but the majority of cases of pernicious anemia have nothing to do with diet (most occur in older people, who are also subject to microcytic forms of anemia, and in people with gastric disorders that leave them deficient in Intrinsic Factor, which is necessary for B12 absorption). Here is a review that tells a different story: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20701748 This review finds that a vegetarian diet is associated with a lower risk of venous thromboembolism, whereas the paper by Li noted that certain biomarker values characteristic of vegetarian and especially vegan diets might be associated with increased VTE risk. All of which is to say that disease risk is a lot more complex than might be suspected from looking at biomarker assays.
I prayed for deliverance from the hard world of facts and logic to the happy land where fantasy and prejudice reign. But God spake unto me, saying, "No, keep telling the truth," and to that end afflicted me with severe Trenchant Mouth. So I'm sorry for making cutting remarks, but it's the will of God.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 9:17PM #207 | |
|
I am a vegetarian working towards veganism, my blood tests come out incredibly well, and that is as I recover from cancer treatement.
A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato.. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 9:53PM #208 | |
My hopes and poor prayers are with you, mc. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 10:24PM #209 | |
|
Mainecaptain, I had no idea you have been under treatment for cancer. I hope your recovery will be complete, and that you will continue to grace Beliefnet with your gentle spiritual insights for a long time to come. Sincerely, Heretic--your friend
I prayed for deliverance from the hard world of facts and logic to the happy land where fantasy and prejudice reign. But God spake unto me, saying, "No, keep telling the truth," and to that end afflicted me with severe Trenchant Mouth. So I'm sorry for making cutting remarks, but it's the will of God.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 06, 2011 - 10:41PM #210 | |
(((((((((((Heretic)))))))))) thank you so much, friends like you, make my life even more precious
A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato.. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|