every time i meet and fall for a member of the opposite sex they tease me and use
me then throw me away. what ever happened to do unto others as you would have
them do to you?

Is every one gone materialistic or am i just cursed with being lonley and alone?

is our world that out of touch with themselfs and with god

i pray for you and me then

AMEN

_______________________________________________________
Edited for format only, in an attempt to fix the thread's formatting.

StephenK.Adams writes:  ...if, as you say on your Profile, your gender or sex is unknown..

"Unknown" is not an indication that a user does not know his/her gender "Unknown" is simply the default setting when a user chooses not to specify his/her gender,

NHT
host

Aug 2, 2010 -- 10:48PM, Nay_ho_tze wrote:

StephenK.Adams writes:  ..if, as you say on your Profile, your gender or sex is unknown..

"Unknown" is not an indication that a user does not know his/her gender
"Unknown" is simply the default setting when a user chooses not to specify his/her gender,

NHT
host

Wouldn't it be better to allow the person to simply say that, --- instead of introducing a default setting that confuses the issue?

StephenK.Adams writes: Wouldn't it be better to allow the person 
to simply say that, [ID his/her gender] --- 
instead of introducing a default setting that confuses the issue?

The default setting only comes into play
when a person chooses not to answer ...
the choice of whether to answer is left entirely up to the user.

StephenK.Adams writes: What is there to highjack?  
It's okay for you to critique me without crossing 
over into a highjacked situation (at least in your mind), 
but if I ask you to explain yourself, 
you decide that i am trying to highjack the thread?
Just recently beliefnet.com was sold again.   
Probably because they couldn't generate enough money 
from the commercials that appear on this site.  
The more private emails that are sent, 
the less revenue there will be for beliefnet.com. 

This entire post is off-topic and as such is in violation of the ROC
because singularly it is clearly hijacking this thread ...

Please adhere to the ROC and keep threads on topic.
Thank you.

NHT
host

Aug 4, 2010 -- 2:09PM, StephenK.Adams wrote:

Aug 3, 2010 -- 11:00PM, Nay_ho_tze wrote:

StephenK.Adams writes: Wouldn't it be better to allow the person 

to simply say that, [ID his/her gender] --- 

instead of introducing a default setting that confuses the issue?



The default setting only comes into play

when a person chooses not to answer ...

the choice of whether to answer is left entirely up to the user.



StephenK.Adams writes: What is there to highjack?

It's okay for you to critique me without crossing 

over into a highjacked situation (at least in your mind), 

but if I ask you to explain yourself, 

you decide that i am trying to highjack the thread?

Just recently beliefnet.com was sold again.

Probably because they couldn't generate enough money 

from the commercials that appear on this site. 

The more private emails that are sent, 

the less revenue there will be for beliefnet.com. 



This entire post is off-topic and as such is in violation of the ROC

because singularly it is clearly hijacking this thread ...



Please adhere to the ROC and keep threads on topic.

Thank you.



NHT

host

If my posts are off topic please explain to me why green submission is on topic?

_______________________________________________________
Edited for format only, in an attempt to fix the thread's formatting.