| 1 year ago :: May 06, 2012 - 9:38AM #31 | |
The problem is that for a lot of people, having to admit that a person can be a "Christian" but not be Christ-like would force them to admit to things they don't want to admit to. It would also force them to admit that perhaps the folks they disagree with might have something right. Welcome to the board. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 06, 2012 - 11:02AM #32 | |
WWA: That’s because I’m not worrying whether they are saved or not. …..your salvation is between you and the Lord. That may be your personal position but that is not the official LDS position. And that is what we are discussing. The fact the Mormon church sends out thousands of its missionaries every year means they are worried about others salvation (as they see it) and don’t think it is something between an individual and the Lord. What you are asking is are they saved? Saved = Having been reconciled to God solely of the basis of the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross which enables to be indwelt by the Holy Spirit and live a live of love as they do God’s will in this life and looking forward to the day that they will live with Jesus in heaven. Because the atheist feeds the poor is he saved? Since he rejects God, he is not reconciled to God. Whether one does "good" things does not reconcile one to God. That is done only via Jesus Christ. Yet you agree there are many who accept all your points of doctrine and on the outside appear to be Christian but they are not save for they lack that personal relationship. So they can’t really be Christian by your definition can they? If one is not reconciled to God then no they do not fit the biblical definition of being saved. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 06, 2012 - 11:04AM #33 | |
The problem is that you are trying to come to some sort of conclusion without considering all the types of people. In general terms one could breakdown the types of people in the world into four categories. 1) One who rejects* the Biblical Christ and lives a life of sin. 2) One who rejects the Biblical Christ but tries to live a righteous life. 3) One who accepts the Biblical Christ but lives a life of sin. 4) One who accepts the Biblical Christ and tries to live a righteous life You are only considering type 2 and 3. They are both in the same boat concerning their eternal destination, joining up with type 1 on the way. Type 4 will have a much different post life experience. If one wishes to get into the splitting of the hairs then one would then have to be able to determine which is worse: being an out right sinner, following a false Christ, or being a hypocritical or false believer. For me I say let God sort that out. Also I bristle at the term “better”. Type 4 is not necessarily “better” than the others. I’d say they conform themselves to what Jesus desires of all people and thus are in a much more preferred position concerning their relation to God. *Reject can be taken to mean not accept or be indifferent. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 06, 2012 - 11:57AM #34 | |
|
Joe; That may be your personal position but that is not the official LDS position. And that is what we are discussing. The fact the Mormon church sends out thousands of its missionaries every year means they are worried about others salvation (as they see it) and don’t think it is something between an individual and the Lord.
Wise men still seek him.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 06, 2012 - 12:24PM #35 | |
Ah, and what happened to "God is love"? Secondly, you evidently haven't understood your gospels but rather taken a few verses out of context to support your a priori personal leanings. Jesus never drew attention to Himself and never asked anyone to worship Him as their saviour. He was ever adamant to refer everything to His Father. And please don't shove John 14:6 or John 1:1 down my throat as if they counter my point in any way. Christ-centrism is a later invention (starting from Athanasius and brought to fruition by Augustine) by your fellow-Jesus-cultists (a.k.a. "True Christians"). Jesus never said: By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye worship Me as your saviour. He said: By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another. Your way of dedicating an entire thread to diss Osteen and the Mormons is insolent, un-Christ-like and demonstrates a weakness of faith. What makes me angry is your arrogant dismissive tone, and I'm glad to see how the Mormons prove their value by merely behaving better than you. I don't claim I do. Kind regards, LilWabbit
"All things have I willed for you, and you too, for your own sake."
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 06, 2012 - 1:52PM #36 | |
|
LilWabbit; …..and I'm glad to see how the Mormons prove their value by merely behaving better than you
Wise men still seek him.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 06, 2012 - 6:23PM #37 | |
I'm a marked man. I've had threats of violence leveled against me simply for being proud of being Mormon, and I'm starting to lose track of the number of ministers and professional authors who have come down on me over the years. That's right: I probably have a price on my head as we speak. Compared to those guys, Joe isn't anything special, and certainly nothing to get upset over. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 07, 2012 - 3:17AM #38 | |
LilWabbit: Ah, and what happened to "God is love"? “God is love” tells us of one of the basic attributes of God. But it does not tell us what the gospel is. Secondly, you evidently haven't understood your gospels but rather taken a few verses out of context to support your a priori personal leanings. Well it is easy to make that accusation, but a bit more difficult to prove. Good luck. Jesus never drew attention to Himself and never asked anyone to worship Him as their saviour. Jesus accepted worship - Matthew 2:2, 8, 11 . Matthew 28:9, Matthew 14:3, Matthew 28:17, John Whether he asked for it is irrelevant. He accepted it. If it was inappropriate He would have stopped it. He was ever adamant to refer everything to His Father. Jesus lived a life of submission to the Father and of service to people as the ultimate exemplar for us as to how we should live. This should already be obvious from Philp 2 --"let this attitude be in you which was in Christ Jesus", but it is pervasive in the New Testament. From the 'it is enough for the disciple to be like his teacher' to the foot-washing 'I have left you an example to follow', His life was the model for all of us. "Walk as He did", "love one another as I have loved you", "ask your heavenly Father", and on and on--He modeled what authentic, life-bearing humanity was to be. His submission to the Father does not negate his deity or his role as Savior. And please don't shove John 14:6 or John 1:1 down my throat as if they counter my point in any way. Great verse! Jn14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. Why would Jesus say this if all we need is love? Can’t we be reconciled to the Father just by loving? Hebrews 11:6 And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him Why would Hebrews say we need faith and to seek Him if all we need is love? Christ-centrism is a later invention (starting from Athanasius and brought to fruition by Augustine) by your fellow-Jesus-cultists (a.k.a. "True Christians"). Great assertion. However, you'd have to offer some support for anyone to see it as reasonable. Jesus never said: By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye worship Me as your saviour.; Did I say that he did? Nope. {Strawman alert} He said: By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another. Why then would Paul say in 1 Cor 15 that if Jesus Christ didn’t rise their faith was in vain? How could that be if the gospel is just about “love? Why all the warnings about false gods, and false christs if all one has to do is “love”? Furthermore, Jesus is talking to his disciples. He is telling them how THEY will be recognized as Christ’s disciples. He is NOT saying this is how one becomes a disciple - i.e. "just love". No one comes to the father except through Jesus Christ in whom we need to have faith and seek. It is relatively easy for one to take one verse in isolation with all others and say “all you need is love.” It is much more difficult to take all the pertinent verses and come to an understanding. In any case you seem to have some issues with Christian theology but this is a forum to discuss LDS theology. I don’t think the mods would like it too much if two non-Mormons were discussing CT here. So you’ll have to take it to an appropriate forum |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 07, 2012 - 5:29AM #39 | |
|
Mark 12:29-31 (highlights added) 29 Jesus answered him, “The first of all the commandments is: ‘Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one. 30 And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength.’b]">[b] This is the first commandment.c]">[c] 31 And the second, like it, is this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’d]">[d] There is no other commandment greater than these.” 1 John 4:8 8 He who does not love does not know God, for God is love. The first, neither the second, commandment from God to the follower of Christ is not 'worship the Son as the Lord your God'. If it were, then Christ's disciples should indeed be known for worshipping the Son as their Lord rather than for loving one another. It would have also been more clearly and more often articulated in the gospels. Yet the latter is what Jesus highlights. The gospels are rather clear on the keynote of Christian faith. Love. The gospels do not say "All you need is love". The Beatles did. That's your strawman. On this board, the Mormons are doing a better job than "True Christians" by the simple measure of love. I'd say not bad for "non-Christians". Kind regards, LilWabbit
"All things have I willed for you, and you too, for your own sake."
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 07, 2012 - 5:35AM #40 | |
|
It is not the empty name of Jesus that a true Christian accepts, nor personal salvation through a mere name that he hankers after. It is the divine attributes He manifests that ultimately touch him. And the greatest of them is love. A Christian A Christian has Faith in Christ Not in the want of salvation, for Faith seeks no gratification; Not for miracles and wondrous works, for Faith needs no external assurance; Not in the dread of damnation, for Faith fears neither fire nor sorrow; Not as a Gift of the Spirit, for Faith devoid of Will is dead; Not blindly because the Book decrees, for Faith devoid of Heart is hollow.
A Christian has Faith in Christ Because of His abounding Compassion, for He loved a child unlike any mortal; Because of His penetrating Knowledge, for He made mere fishermen the teachers of men; Because of His sublime Dominion, for He spoke with authority not vested in created things.
For Faith rejoices in a single word of His counsel to the Apostles, and in His bold rebuke of the Pharisees; With the breaking of the bread at the Last Supper, and the silence of His suffering.
For mortal eyes see god where Faith sees but dust, and Faith sees God where mortal eyes see but dust.
"All things have I willed for you, and you too, for your own sake."
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|