| 3 years ago :: Jul 10, 2010 - 10:57PM #1 | |
|
For those who value the teachings of the parables, etc. without the virgin birth and rising from the dead, etc? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 11, 2010 - 4:08PM #2 | |
Just my opinion since I do not speak for all Progressive Christians, but I believe for most Progressives it doesn't matter. I do not take many parts of the Bible as literal. Just like Jesus is said to have spoken in parables, many Bible stories are allegories as far as I'm concerned. We ought to be looking for the meaning to the stories, not take it as the Gospel (no pun intended). Welcome to the Progressive Christians Forum. I hope you will enjoy it here and all that Beliefnet offers to it's members.
Beliefnet Community Wide Moderator ~ Peace Love Stardove
Problems? Send a message to Beliefnet_community Nothing but your own thoughts can hamper your progress. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 12, 2010 - 3:52PM #3 | |
Today there is a modern Jeffersonian who expands on Jefferson's work, not only with regard to trying to bring about a new reformation of Christianity, but also to bring about a new reformation of government. For example, read The 21st Century Declaration of Independence: How America Can Become a Truly Good Example to the World. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 14, 2010 - 8:03PM #4 | |
|
I guess it depends on what you mean, in detail, by the 'supernatural aspects'. I understand that the Holy Spirit sent Jesus to be the Christ Avatar for the cosmic Age of Pisces the fishes, and that his principal role was to bring the new spiritual teachings for that Age. See John 18:37 At some point during his life, he became an "ascended master" and performing miracles then became natural, as he then had power and mastery over time and space, as do all ascended masters. OTH, the Christmas story was probably made up as it was representative of the rewritten bios of most famous men. I do accept that there was a spiritual awakening that came to be called the resurection, but that it was spiritual rather than physical. OTH, I seriously doubt that 500, or anyone, rose from their graves and walked thru Jerusalem. This was most likely added to the story in order to fulfill some old Jewish prophesy so as to make Jesus look like the expected 'Messiah".
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 14, 2010 - 8:31PM #5 | |
Nor have I ever heard this scripture taught in any church as to the possible meaning. Literal? We agree Bob. Good to see you as always.
Beliefnet Community Wide Moderator ~ Peace Love Stardove
Problems? Send a message to Beliefnet_community Nothing but your own thoughts can hamper your progress. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 16, 2010 - 5:28PM #6 | |
It's actually quite a normal way of viewing it from a liberal perspective. All can be challenged: the virgin birth, the crucifixion, the resurrection and ascension. Note that only two of the Gospels have a version of the virgin birth and they differ and so do the geneologies. While all four of the Gospels have the crucifixion and resurrection, they all differ as to almost all the details. On the other hand, I think the Gospels are an amazing and artful way to lead people into the mystery of faith. Brilliant! A. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 17, 2010 - 5:11PM #7 | |
|
I too would consider the meaning when referring to, "Supernatural" as relates in the parables attributed to Yeshua/Jesus. If one first accepts that creator is omnipotent and Omni-genetic then all things emanating from that power are created from the nature of creator/god. Thus as I see it nothing can be "super" or superior to that natural occurrence. I think if one first believes a demi-god like the Rabbi Yeshua did exist and teach and heal among the masses of ancient Palestine, they must also recognize he was as he said he was. God incarnate. Thus, if with god all things are possible Jesus was simply channeling through human form the very power that made the world he inhabited and the humans he walked among, possible in the first place. If one believes in god they can't think anything can be super natural to that creator of the natural.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 17, 2010 - 9:34PM #8 | |
|
Well, I dont really think of God as a personality or Jesus as a Demi God. Hercules was a Demi God in the Greek stories, so I have trouble apply that term to Jesus. I would say that I share the view of Arius.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 18, 2010 - 2:06AM #9 | |
|
Was Jesus born of a virgin or physically rise from the dead? Many Christians see these things as being literally true. I see them as a way the gospel writers used to convey their belief that in the person of Jesus somehow the human and devine met. Whatever the truth I do not see belief in these supernatural events as being essential to Christian faith. If anything they are a distraction from the things that truly matter when we look at Jesus life. Aussiesoul |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 3 years ago :: Jul 29, 2010 - 3:53PM #10 | |
I don't see god as an anthropomorphic being. However, Jesus was said to be born of Mary as god incarnate. So, when I refer to him as a Demigod ("Man-God"), it's because Demigod describes someone who's has one parent as mortal human and the other as supreme being or Deity. Making the son of man, "Man-God". |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
