Post Reply
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Switch to Forum Live View My Case Againist Jediism:
3 years ago  ::  Mar 25, 2010 - 9:51PM #1
Opiemacleod
Posts: 21

My Final Case Against the Jedi Religion:
 My name is Opie Macleod and for years I have stood opposed to Jediism, the Jedi Religion. If one wants to believe the Force is a sentient being, that is their freedom, their choice. My issue is not in a freedom to follow such ideals, but to clearly state that believing such does not make the Jedi a Religion. The Jedi is simply a philosophical ideology. And while we are not organized enough to put the Jedi Path forward as solidified Philosophy (such as Taoism or Stoicism), it is a lifestyle choice that is valid. It is simply not a religion by any means, and continuing to state it as such is not only an embarrassment to those that follow the Jedi Path, but it also misleads others (the public) as to what the Jedi are truly about. As such I have stood against Jediism, but this is to be my final argument against the Jedi Religion. From here I shall hope that my previous attempts along with this article serve to prove Jediism is not a religion. And people start calling the Jedi Path what it truly is.


 We will be looking at 13 points to decide whether or not Jediism is a Religion or not. In each point we will be looking at the Jedi as a whole (the ideological path) and specifically Jediism (the self-proclaimed religion). We will look at both as Jediism does have differences which must be taken into account. However, we must also look at the greater whole of the Jedi Community, because even the term Jediism is only one part of a much more accepted belief. The belief that the Jedi Path is a lifestyle, a ideological view which one bases their life on.


 I will also be including another report done by a Jedi which explores whether or not the Jedi as a whole is a religion or not. However it is my goal that before one gets to that point the issue will be clear. Jediism is not a Religion, get could mimic one given the effort, but in the end it will always fall short to what the Jedi Path truly is, and that is simply a lifestyle based upon a philosophical ideology presented via Star Wars and expanded upon by actual life experience.


 I want to point out where I got these 13 points. Most of them are from the United States Internal Revenue Service's own 13 point qualifier for whether or not something is a religion. Some of these points were changed to deal with dictionary definitions of the word religion. Giving us a more complete and definitive view of what is required of a religion. Not all with agree with certain points used as a basis of religion, but they provide solid evidence as to where and why Jediism is lacking being able to call itself an actual religion (rather than a simple belief and/or ideology).


 Now to clarify 501(c)(3) status does not make one a religion. That simply places it as a non-profit organization with tax exemption. Meaning you can donate money to the group and have it written off on your taxes. Which many religions including the controversial Scientology have and use. I'd also like to point out that Religious freedom and protection as ruled by the United States of America allows one the right and protection to believe what they wish and not be discriminated for it. A Jedi is protected under the Constitution of the United States of religious rights, but again this does not make it a religion.


  I cannot speak for other countries as my knowledge and experience is limited in regards to their legal and constitutional standards. However I can point out that in the United Kingdoms in 2005; the drafting of the UK Racial and Religious Hatred Act, an amendment was proposed which specifically excluded Jedi Knights from any protection, alongside Satanists, sexists, racists, and believers in animal or human sacrifice. This shows where many view the level of Jediism and that is not very flattering company to be placed with.


 It is my sincere hope that by the end of this article we can all agree on two things. First that Jediism is in fact not a religion. Even if one views the Force as a sentient deity (which 90% of Jedi will say it is not), Jediism itself is not an actual religion. Secondly, that the Jedi Path itself is a valid lifestyle choice. And that it does not need to be a religion in order to be a viable way in which to live ones life, if they so chose.


1. A Stance on Life-After-Death, Creation of the Universe, and the service and worship of a deity.
 The Jedi Path: This is a stance of personal belief and development. The Jedi as a whole do not have a pre-described belief to the creation of the universe, what happens when you die, nor even a stance on deity. The Jedi Path allows these issues to be resolved by the individual Jedi. Whether that be based upon their culture, up-bringing, or simple choice, such religious and spiritual beliefs are for each Jedi to decide and deal with themselves.


The Force is the biggest thing people will point to in relation to this. However while the majority of Jedi can look at the Force, believe in it, and give a basic classification of the Force (non-sentient energy field connected to life), it is not fully accepted. There are Jedi who do not believe in the Force. So while there is a supernatural element to the Jedi, we must recognize it is not always accepted.


 Jediism: The first problem we come to with Jediism is that it has no set belief in regards to these issues. Some Jediists (followers of Jediism) actually prescribe to the Christianity beliefs. This being in reference to all aspects of issue One. Yet you also have Jediists who believe that when you die you become one with the Force. This belief being more comparable to Taoist thought. This also comes into play with the creation of the universe and the Force, many Jediists again fall to a more Taoist approach that the Force has no beginning and thus has no end.


 Overall we see a very diversified belief in these core aspects of any religion. Any religion can tell you exactly what their belief dictates on these three core subjects. If you go to a Catholic church and ask them how the was the universe created everyone will have the same basic answer. If you ask a followers of Islam what happens when you die, you will get a core answer from all. If you ask the Jewish Community who and how they worship you will get the same answer. And yet Jediism, let alone the Jedi Community, cannot provide a singular basic answer for you. And will more often than not, inform you that is your decision to make.


2. A Recognized Creed and Form of Worship.
 The Jedi Path: We can look at a couple different sources for a creed within the Jedi Path. Most commonly we can see the Jedi Code being used as the basis for such a creed. However it lacks many aspects one would associate with such a valuable piece of text. We can, though many do not, turn to the Jedi Circle. This certainly fulfills the criteria of a creed. We can see practices, beliefs, and guidelines listed within the Jedi Circle. As such we must concede that the Jedi Path does have a creed. Even if not the Jedi Circle, we can look within the fiction and find something.


Yet what we will not find is a form of worship. At best one can list meditation as a form of worship. Yet again we come to a critical question. What is a Jedi worshiping? The Jedi Path, by majority, does not view the Force itself as a sentient being. We are not worshiping ourselves, it is simply fact that the Jedi Path has no form of worship. No prayers, no revered silence (since meditation does not have to require silence and many forms are very active and loud), no fasting, no holidays. The Jedi simply do not completely fulfill this area.


 Jediism: Jediism does have a specific creed. However this creed does differ from group to group. Where the Temple of the Jedi Order specifically states a Creed, the Jedi Church out-right states they have no doctrine or form of worship. Again looking the Temple of the Jedi Order, we see they state multiple belief systems, claiming that Jediism is an actual religion itself (without providing any frame of reference) but that most follow a form of Jediism, such as Christian Jedi or Buddhist Jedi.


 Overall we see that Jediism is too diverse, even within a singular organization of Jediism to classify any set creed, doctrine, or form of worship. Which is understandable, since worshiping Buddha often takes a different form than worshiping Christ, which can take a different than worshiping God (comparing Judaism to Christianity). It must be seen than that Jediism is unable to fulfill this requirement by themselves. And certainly cannot do so as a collective whole. Thus bringing us again to the conclusion that it is a lifestyle choice of philosophical ideals, rather than a religion within itself.


3. A Definite and Distinct Ecclesiastical of Government.
To be clear we are stating a body which governs as defined by a specific deity. In other words a type of Church or even a theocracy. Within the fiction of Star Wars one would no doubt look at the Jedi Council and the Jedi Temple itself as this foundation of Ecclesiastical Government.
 The Jedi Path: While each organization and/or site may have a system of a governing body. It fails to provide a definite and distinct form, especially one as directed by the Force or any type of supernatural entity.  What we can say in all certainly, like so many of these issues, is that each individual organization has its own method of governing the organization itself and the progress of the Jedi within that particular organization. While most Jedi Groups use a Council archetype how that Council is chosen differs greatly. And it is not detailed that the Council rules by the say of the Force, nor even Star Wars. But simply within the experience and beliefs of that particular Jedi group/organization.


 Jediism: Much like the greater Jedi Community, Jediism works off the concept of Star Wars. A Council is chosen to govern the group/organization. However how this group is chosen, why this group is chosen varies from group to group. The one common factor we can find in all of them is that the group/site/organization's creator is always a member of the Council. For how long is another issue, but in the beginning they are a Council member. Outside of this common occurrence, we tend to find that individuality once again deters more than any singular belief of the Jedi as a whole.


 Overall however, we can look and point to the Council, the governing body of a Jedi group/organization and say this is their definite and distinct ecclesiastical government. Yet we must concede once again that this only works on a individual group basis, as the Jedi as a collective whole, Jediism as a collective religion, do not have any set organized institution. The ideals, reasoning, processes, and form of administration is too diversified to simply claim this in favor of the Jedi Religion.


4. A Formal Code of Doctrine and Discipline.
 The Jedi Path: Easy enough to point to without making any explanation or excuses. The Jedi Code, the Jedi Rules of Behavior, the Jedi Circle, the Jedi Method. You will find the Jedi Code taught at every single Jedi Site. It is looked at, it is taught, it is discussed, and it is pushed as a core value of all Jedi. And as listed there are several others which do vary from Jedi group to Jedi group, however you can find the Jedi Circle at a lot of these places. In the end, this is one area where the Jedi as a whole do have a core set of values. And they do require training of these values before one can progress within the Jedi Path


 Jediism: Similar to the Jedi Path the Jediists do have a set Code and value. The Jedi Code, along with training. Jediism does have training, which does include the Jedi Code. It is this common Code that cannot be ignored or truly argued. While we can point to the lack of standardized training, what we will find is training on the Jedi Code.


 Overall this requirement is met. Saved by a singular Code written for role-playing purposes back in 1987. And while some sites may prefer a different version of the Jedi Code, such as the 1996 version, which added an extra line. 1987 we had a four line Code, in 1996 it was five (better known in the 2001 Star Wars game Knights of the Old Republic). Regardless of the version we must admit that this is a common ground for all Jedi and a requirement by all Jedi. Thus Jediism passes.


5. A Distinct Religious History.
 The Jedi Path: We have no religious history. We have no savior, prophet, or select deity. We have no religious movement. In this we have only our individual religious (or lack thereof) beliefs and the history that comes with that. The Jedi Community really came into its own in 1999, existed since 1995, and has had individual followers since 1977. There are particular events, but those we will look at in favor of Jediism.


 Jediism: Jediism really only came about in terminology and actuality in 2001. In 2001 the New Zealand and United Kingdom census was underway. A viral e-mail made its way across the globe requesting that people put Jedi as their religion on the census. The e-mail claimed that if enough people did this, Jedi would become an officially recognized religion. First, that is not true. No matter how many people claim a belief on the census it does not make it a religion. It simply gives the government a new numbering system to include said belief. In this case Jedi has its own filing number.


Secondly, this was done and supported for many reasons. Yet the truth is most did so as a joke, as a social experiment, and as a protest. Most who listed Jedi as their religion in 2001 did not and do not actually believe or follow Jediism. It was a huge joke, in which others added their own crusade too.


Nevertheless Jediism was born. And with it came the Jediism Way into the already well established Jedi Community. This is the religious history of the Jedi Religion. In more recent news (at the time of writing) was the Church of Jediism creator Daniel Jones seeking religious discrimination against United Kingdom corporation Tesco. This being over a Tesco store requesting Mr. Jones remove his hood and Mr. Jones claiming that due to Jedi Religious beliefs he is suppose to wear his hood up when in public. The status of this process is unknown at this time, but all legal analysts have said Mr. Jones does not have a case, as the United Kingdom does not recognize Jediism as a religion.


Also Temple of the Jedi Order and Temple of the Jedi Force have both claimed that they have 501(c)(3) status with the United States Internal Revenue Service. This has not been verified, however if true, it does speak to the groups of Jediism seeking religious recognition.


 Overall Jediism does have some history in seeking religious recognition. There is a clear show of individuals moving to make Jediism a religion. It lacks foundation, cause, however the history, as far as history goes, is there. And in this we might need to concede that Jediists have grounds of history. While the Jedi Path certainly has a longer course of history, we cannot deny the efforts of certain modivated individuals.


6. A Membership Not Associated with any Other Church or Denomination.
 The Jedi Path: We can look at the Jedi and see the wide variety of belief systems. From Atheists to Wiccans, the Jedi Path is filled with individuals free to explore their own religious (or lack thereof) beliefs. Your religious preference is your religious preference. As such we can see that the Jedi simply do not fall within this category. Be a Jedi, your religion is up to you.


 Jediism: The Jedi Religion, like the rest of the Jedi, allow one to keep their religion. This however is a complete contradiction to the most followed and allowed religion, Christianity. Christianity in itself does not allow on to be a Christian and something else. It is listed very clearly within the first two commandments of the Ten Commandments of the Holy Bible. And any Jedi Religion site will defend Jediism as being allowed to follow other religions. One again we see encouragement of Christian Jedi, Buddhist Jedi, Wiccan Jedi, etc.


 Overall we can see that neither system falls in line with this category. Jediism would take a huge hit in numbers if they actually stood up to be counted as a religion. And the parents of the many kids that claim be to a Jediist would immediately put a stop to participation, if the children had to give-up their religion to be a Jediist. The fact is Jediism wants the best of both worlds. They want to be called and considered a religion, so people will take them seriously, but at the same time they are trying to please everyone by allowing everything. In the essence of religion and religious recognition Jediism once again falls short.  


7. A Set of Beliefs Concerning the Cause, Nature, and Purpose of the Universe.
 The Jedi Path: This really boils down to the Force. The supernatural element of the Jedi Path. Most Jedi believe in the Force. The Force is unseen and thus must fall in a category of belief. As such, as mentioned before, there are Jedi who do not believe in the Force. Thus we cannot point to any one singular belief and teaching within the Jedi Path and say here are our beliefs in regards to the universe.


It is too much of an individual thing for the Jedi to classify a specific belief in regards to the universe, its creation, or its purpose. As Jedi we recognize our limitation in this and others draw on their own religious beliefs to address this issues. Thus the only majority accepted belief we can draw upon here is that most Jedi believe in an energy field created and sustained by all life in which we live our daily lives (regardless of belief).


 Jediism: We find once again that the Force is the main element which must address this concern. And while one can take a Taoist like approach and say the Force created the universe, we find that no one explanation is available. And even if one considers the Force the same as the Christian God, again that only provides us with so many explanations to this particular issue. Because we cannot deny the Jediists who take a more scientific outlook to how and why the universe was created.


 Overall we find that individual beliefs take priority over core religious ideals. Christianity can address this issue, Islam can address this issue, Taoism can address this issue, Buddhism can address this issue. And yet Jediism must rely on the individual to decide that for themselves. And there is nothing wrong with that, however it certainly speaks against Jediism being an actual religion.


8. A Literature of Its Own.
 The Jedi Path: This cannot be denied, in a sense. Actual real life applicable material written by Jedi Practitioners for non-fictional use can be found at every single Jedi site. The Jedi Circle is a prime example of this. And there is several others, such as the Jedi Jewel Series, and many Jedi Training Manuals. As well as Adam Yew's Great Holocron. And while none of these materials are published and found within bookstores, one can find books on the subject of Jedi. And this of course is not in reference to all the fictional sources available.


 Jediism: Again we can find many texts written specifically for the use of Jediists in reference to Jediism. Any Jediism site will have lectures, texts, manuals and so forth ready for those interested. And again while there is no officially published material in the form of a book at say Barnes and Nobles, there is enough material to support this particular issue.


 Overall we can see that this area for the past 8 to 10 years has been fulfilled in one way or another. Often the groups themselves have enough simply on their main web pages to qualify for this point. Yet if one were to be required to point to a more Bible like reference, this would not be possible. However the issue does not specifically say a book of biblical portions. It simply states literature of its own – which can be found within both aspects. 


9. Established Places of Worship.
 The Jedi Path: The main problem here is establishing what is meant by an establish place of worship. First does the internet count? If so, the Jedi certainly do have many established places to gather. However, worship? Discuss, debate, learn, lead, contribute, but I do not believe worship falls within the context of the many established Jedi sites. Again it is coming down to the fact that we do not really have anything to worship. We have ideas, philosophies, lessons, lectures, plenty of things to explore and debate, but nothing to worship.


Now if we are talking strictly established in-person places. Well, even for places to debate and discuss that is not true. I personally get together with others when I can at a local restaurant, but I highly doubt that qualifies. The Jedi do have yearly gatherings, but again the location varies. And again one would not classify it as a place of worship.  


 Jediism: Again the main issue is deciding whether or not the online world counts. If so, than there are certainly places to meet up and “worship” if they do in fact worship anything. However, if we are talking more in line with an actual church, than no. Parks, personal home, these have been known to be places of regular meet-ups with locally organized Jediist Groups, yet they are not established places of worship per se.


 Overall this issue is one that can go either way, in a sense. Yet I still maintain that even if one counts the internet or more to the point a website as an established place of worship. The Jedi themselves do not have an actual place of worship, since they vary in their worship. Yet perhaps on their website they have a place for the various aspects of worship. Than in that sense one must decide if a website counts as an established place of worship. I personally do not believe so, but I'll leave that to you.


10. Ritual Observance of Faith; Holidays.
 The Jedi Path: The Jedi Path itself has no officially accepted holidays, days of observance, or rituals of observance. Again these are personal aspects to each Jedi and vary from Jedi to Jedi. It depends on one's actual religious following. And while I personally would not mind seeing a day or two dedicated to Jedi Observance of some kind, the fact remains there is no such thing currently.


 Jediism: Jediism does seek to fulfill this point. However these vary from site to site. Some of a day of Jedi Observance, while others have days where they remember members who have died. In the end Jediism itself, as a Religion, has no specific days or rituals of observance. Each Jediism site may have days which they use, some may have none, again we see a clear lack of solidarity.


 Overall we can look exactly at what this issue is looking for. Christmas, Easter, for the Christians. Yom Kippur, Chanukkah for the Jewish faith. Eid Al-Fitr and Eid Al-Adha for Islam, and so on and so forth. Yet the Jedi have no such observance, because the Jedi have no such beliefs. The Jedi are simply not a religion, thus they do not fall within the religious perimeters. And as such they do not have the same sort of rituals and holidays as all other recognized religions.


11. Regular Religious Services.
 The Jedi Path: Simply put the Jedi Path as a whole has no regular religious services. Individual sites do not hold regular religious services. There is no Sunday school for the Jedi. There is barely academies for learning basic Jedi Philosophy, there is certainly no religious services held on a regular basis.


 Jediism: Again no regular religious services. I have heard of such being held, service at a Jediist's home. However this has not been confirmed. Still, if this does take place, than it would hold some validity in a sense. However, again we must recognize what constitutes religious services. The Jedi simply do not have the ability to fulfill this even if they could. And we must acknowledge the problem with the Jedi Religion itself stating others from various religious backgrounds may be Jediists. In this a regular religious service would have to either ignore personal religious practices or incorporate all religious practices. And this simply is not done on a regular basis.


 Overall if the Jediists could prove and provide regular religious services, which would be extremely difficult without a form of worship, and without specific ritual observance and rites, then the Jediists would have a point here. However again there Is no Jedi Church building. There is no Sunday sermons, there are no Sunday schools, etc. (using Sunday schools simply as an example as it is widely known.) It is a point which could be correct and debated, but as it stands, the Jedi Religion just does not fulfill this issue.


12. Schools for the Religious Instruction of the Young.
 The Jedi Path: Most sites will not allow anyone under the age of 12 to sign up. And on average the youngest members of the Jedi Community are about 16. Within these age groups the Jedi Path does offer basic instruction, but it is the exact same instruction that a 32 year old would get. The Jedi do not have any training program geared towards children below the age of 12. There are simply too many legal issues with such a practice.


 Jediism: Much like the rest of the Jedi Community, Jediism is limited to the internet. As such their general membership does not go below 14 years of age. And likewise their training program is geared simply towards anyone interested in becoming a Jediist; whether they are 12 or 42, they get the same basic program.


 Overall the Jedi just do not have anything geared towards the young. Other religions have to worry about this aspect as the wide-spread membership demands that when a parent wants to bring their children up in their religious ways, they have a place they can put them to properly learn and understand the views and ways of that Religion. The Jedi Religion however, having no established actual church, does not have a need to address this issue. Thus Jedi with children simply must educate them on their own. At this point in time, I have no met or heard of any kids of Jedi becoming and participating in the Jedi Community after their parents.


13. Schools for the Preparation of Its Ministers.
 The Jedi Path: Online websites are easy enough to find. Those one can easily question the validity of such, especially as a “school.” While many claim such to fulfill such a role, there are very very few qualified to actually uphold such a claim. But they do exist. Outside of that there are Jedi Gatherings, which hold workshops on different aspects, such as Self-Defense and First Aid. Again, certification to rightfully teach is sometimes a question, but has been provided (proof of certification and license) on more than one occasion.


Whether that it truly enough to fulfill this stipulation is hard to say. The Academies provided online are meant to help others become capable to teach and pass on the Jedi Knowledge. But again it is a recognition that it is not a religion. And much more a lifestyle choice, which allows a little bit more leeway when it comes to certain certifications and rights.


 Jediism: Not too different from the Jedi Path in this respect. There are places you can meet in-person (often after-school). Many websites exist for this purpose as well; to teach others to pass on Jediism to others interested. With titles such as Bishop, Jediism definitely support a much more religious practice and teaching principle. Again the certifications, qualifications, are definitely questionable. So we find that this area is covered at its most basic. It is only when looking at actual certifications and qualifications may a problem present itself.


 Overall, before beginning any training in the Jedi Path, whatever your choice may be, ask questions first. Ask about qualifications, certifications, and teaching credentials. While this area certainly can be said to be covered, it is done mostly by the internet. And that just allows anyone to hold a supposed teaching position. Your wise Jedi Master Arch-Bishop just might be a 17 year old kid who has spent the whole summer studying the Jedi Path is now looking to guide you on the path. So seek just be careful, because religion or not this is the biggest drawback to both communities.


In Conclusion
 In the end we can see multiple reason as to why Jediism is just not an actual religion. And it definitely should not be accounted as an actual religion. The Jedi Path is a lifestyle choice. It is a way of life that offers some philosophical ideals on how to proceed in life and seeks to help others on the way. The Force is the only metaphysical element and that we can see as basic energy (energy in multiple forms, kinetic, thermal, etc.).


 There is no deity, there is no form of worship, no prayers, no holy book. The Jedi Path does not dictate or even speculate on the creation of the universe or what happens when one dies. A Jedi in general is free to seek those answers in their own way in their own time. This is the essence of any religion, having core and concrete ideals about what happens when one dies; as well as how the universe was created. Instead the Jedi is a philosophy that fits closer to Stoicism, there are ideals on how to live and the proper way to live. But these do not ensure ever-lasting life, they do not grant you karma points, it simply means, when you die, you do so as a Jedi.


 The core aspects of any religion, including Atheism, are missing in the Jedi Path. The Jedi Path is a guideline of living as a Jedi. It is about a healthy mind and body, about helping others to help themselves. It is about doing the right thing, simply because it is the right thing to do, nothing more. You do not help others because you will get something in return, you do not help others because you are emotionally compelled too (compassion), you help others because they are in need of help.


 It is simply a Path one walks in life. Religion? Absolutely not. And anyone who claims it as a religion, uses that for personal gains (such as suing companies and job centers), such individuals are definitely not Jedi (in any sense of the word). We are Jedi, that simply means we live by the philosophical ideology of the Jedi Knights as seen in Star Wars.


 Remember, one can be a real Jedi in today's society. It takes years of study, training, and practice, but it is more than possible. People have been living as Jedi for years. It is not their religion, it does not define their views on the after-life or the creation of the universe. It is simply how they have chosen to live their lives.

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 28, 2010 - 12:00AM #2
Bezant
Posts: 1,338

I had no idea this was a real religion.


oooooooooooo

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 12, 2012 - 4:40PM #3
SecondSonOfDavid
Posts: 2,928

I think the question is trickier than it may first appear.  Buddhism, for example, is more philosophy than faith for many of its followers, yet Buddhism is considered a major religion.  And, odd as it may sound, a growing number of people refer to themselves as 'Christian', who neither believe the Gospel accounts nor regularly attend church services. So, in that context an active Jedi practitioner is practicing his 'religion' just as much as someone in a culurally-recognized religion.


Also, you are aware I am sure, that IRS codes regarding religion focus on commercial practices and revenue, not validity of belief.


 

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 09, 2012 - 2:07AM #4
Opiemacleod
Posts: 21

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

I think the question is trickier than it may first appear.



It is really not. It is an issue of divinity. The Jedi has no supernatural element. - The Force? A name applied to a variety of beliefs admittedly, not a singular entity in and of itself. Meaning people use it to replace existing beliefs or be synonymous with an establish belief. The Jedi have no actual spiritual (divine) basis. And despite Jediism's death grip against it, this is actually a good thing and why so many can relate to the ideals within the Jedi Philosophy. And why it should be treated as a philosophy rather than a religion, because it is supplemental.

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

Buddhism, for example, is more philosophy than faith for many of its followers, yet Buddhism is considered a major religion.



To the layman perhaps. But that is a gross misunderstanding of Buddhism and the various sects that exist within Buddhism. Even the most know, and more philosophical in the eyes of Westerns, Zen Buddhism is very religious dealing specifically with what happens when you die and obtaining ways to reach the desired goal within the religion. And has very specific religious rituals to obtain a specific spiritual/divine goal.
Jediism does not have this.

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

a growing number of people refer to themselves as 'Christian', who neither believe the Gospel accounts nor regularly attend church services.



And yet they hold to the ideals expressed the Religion and more importantly they believe in a God which denotes an ideal of not only an after-life but a general idea on how and who created the universe. Perhaps not as described in their holy book, but indeed a belief in a deity. As the point above - the Jediism does not have this.

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

So, in that context an active Jedi practitioner is practicing his 'religion' just as much as someone in a culurally-recognized religion.



No, they are practicing a philosophical concept in which they are exploring spiritual concepts under a name that detaches itself from the misconceptions of religions. This frees an individual to explore religious concepts without having to prescribe to a specific religion. They explore concepts of God, of Divinity, but they do not find the answers within the Jedi Path. For the Jedi Path offers nothing on Creation, After-Life, Deities, and so forth. Instead the Jedi Path says - be objective, acquire knowledge, be patient, be honest with yourself, remove the misconceptions and negative ideas you have and look with fresh eyes on old ideas. Now - what is YOUR conclusion.

This is not religion or a religious practice. This is simply helping an individual find their own spiritual well-being. So again, we see another clear example of Jedi not being a Religion in any sense, but instead an ideology that endorse spiritual well-being among physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Which Jediism forgets 9 times out of 10.

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

Also, you are aware I am sure, that IRS codes regarding religion focus on commercial practices and revenue, not validity of belief.



And yet people have and still do use it as an argument for saying Jediism is a valid Religion. Thus there should be a document exploring that angle. The IRS Code 501c(3) also includes animal charities among other things. So yes it is a broad classification meant simply to organization United States income filings. Still a recognition must be made.



Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 14, 2012 - 6:33AM #5
Redheron
Posts: 10

Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

My Final Case Against the Jedi Religion:



I doubt that highly. The evidence points to the contrary. I would love it if you really would make a "final" argument.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

My name is Opie Macleod and for years I have stood opposed to Jediism, the Jedi Religion.



True. But you have also constantly denied anyone else's right to believe what they will, in spite of claiming to be in favor of upholding everyone's rights. You have in fact been rather adamant about that little fact, in the face of organizations like the Jedi Church, Church of Jediism, and other religious organizations. I will be posting counter-arguments to your points which should uphold a rational, ethical and moral position that at least meets your own, in most cases.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

If one wants to believe the Force is a sentient being, that is their freedom, their choice.



I have never met anyone who believes this, honestly. Most who believe in a god (or gods) who also follow Jediism tend to take their own deities as separate entities, but a great number of Jediists in the world actually hold that the Force is similar in nature to other energies such as the Tao. This doesn't make the Force identical to it, but the similarities are in fact striking. As a religious Jediist who has practiced since 1996, I find your arguments poignant, but lacking in basic informational structure in a great many cases.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

My issue is not in a freedom to follow such ideals, but to clearly state that believing such does not make the Jedi a Religion. The Jedi is simply a philosophical ideology.



But you do in fact take issue with the freedom to claim Jediism as a religious point of view.


A "philosophical ideology" which has an attached (and supporting) practice, as is the case in Esoteric Jediism (which I, along with others, have helped to develop over the past 12 years), is in fact religious, if it includes any component of religion.


Christianity is not the only religion in the world.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

And while we are not organized enough to put the Jedi Path forward as solidified Philosophy (such as Taoism or Stoicism), it is a lifestyle choice that is valid.



Taoism is in fact practiced as a religious ideology: some of my early training was from a Taoist who practices the "folk religion" aspect of the belief. 


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

It is simply not a religion by any means, and continuing to state it as such is not only an embarrassment to those that follow the Jedi Path, but it also misleads others (the public) as to what the Jedi are truly about.



Misleading the public as to the idea that Jediism is not in fact a religion is also a way to try to control and embarras people. This doesn't really support your claim, and is an appeal to pride. As such, your denial's mechanism is revealed: you believe that religion is false, and that belief in the Force as a metaphysical energy field does not comprise a religious position.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

As such I have stood against Jediism, but this is to be my final argument against the Jedi Religion. From here I shall hope that my previous attempts along with this article serve to prove Jediism is not a religion. And people start calling the Jedi Path what it truly is.



And what is that?


I've ALWAYS called it my religion, for as long as I've practiced it.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

However, we must also look at the greater whole of the Jedi Community, because even the term Jediism is only one part of a much more accepted belief. The belief that the Jedi Path is a lifestyle, a ideological view which one bases their life on.



If this is not the core of what is religious, I don't know what is. To base one's life on a philosophical ideal is to practice it; and to use such as a means to better one's self and/or the world is eminently the cause of all religions at their foundation. We tend to lose this as we go along, especially as politics seeps in, but the reality is that you are describing a perfect religion--though not necessarily an organization, such as the Catholic Church or something.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

I will also be including another report done by a Jedi which explores whether or not the Jedi as a whole is a religion or not. However it is my goal that before one gets to that point the issue will be clear. Jediism is not a Religion, get could mimic one given the effort, but in the end it will always fall short to what the Jedi Path truly is, and that is simply a lifestyle based upon a philosophical ideology presented via Star Wars and expanded upon by actual life experience.



That's basically the process I went through, too. Religious vs. non-religious... are you sure about this? I'm positive on my definition of what a religion is or isn't, and yet you dance around making the definition.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Now to clarify 501(c)(3) status does not make one a religion. That simply places it as a non-profit organization with tax exemption. Meaning you can donate money to the group and have it written off on your taxes. Which many religions including the controversial Scientology have and use. I'd also like to point out that Religious freedom and protection as ruled by the United States of America allows one the right and protection to believe what they wish and not be discriminated for it. A Jedi is protected under the Constitution of the United States of religious rights, but again this does not make it a religion.



All religions are exempt under 501(c)(3), and yet not all 501(c)(3) organizations are religions. But the fact is, if it's listed as a religious organization under section 501, then it's probably religious. And the IRS Form 1023 to apply for that status clearly delineates the organization as religious or not.


There are in fact numerous examples of organizations which are solely religious in nature--the IRS doesn't differentiate between churches and civic religious organizations. Neither does the law. What makes these organizations religious is one check-mark on that 1023 form, and the groups themselves are who decide what is or isn't a religion.


To say that ALL of the Jedi practitioners in the world are really not religious is to claim title and right to determine what these groups are or aren't allowed to do. Therefore, your issue is in fact with the right to self-proclaim religious adherence or belief... and yet you don't want to take issue with religious rights?


Frankly, I think you are lacking in the research department.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

I cannot speak for other countries as my knowledge and experience is limited in regards to their legal and constitutional standards. However I can point out that in the United Kingdoms in 2005; the drafting of the UK Racial and Religious Hatred Act, an amendment was proposed which specifically excluded Jedi Knights from any protection, alongside Satanists, sexists, racists, and believers in animal or human sacrifice. This shows where many view the level of Jediism and that is not very flattering company to be placed with.



The UK act also initially excluded Scientology, but their powerful lobbies ensured that the PMs took that out. You are arguing against US law, and then in favor of UK law, wherever it suits your purpose. Your issue is now political, my friend. We didn't have powerful lobbies to oppose that law, and so politics allowed it to stand.


But even that doesn't have any bearing on whether or not it's a religion.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

It is my sincere hope that by the end of this article we can all agree on two things. First that Jediism is in fact not a religion. Even if one views the Force as a sentient deity (which 90% of Jedi will say it is not), Jediism itself is not an actual religion. Secondly, that the Jedi Path itself is a valid lifestyle choice. And that it does not need to be a religion in order to be a viable way in which to live ones life, if they so chose.



The Force is not a sentient deity, but Jediism is still religious in nature.


It is ALSO a valid lifestyle choice, as protected by religious freedom laws around the world. It is also protected as religious in the United States because of its status as a sincerely-held system of beliefs.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

1. A Stance on Life-After-Death, Creation of the Universe, and the service and worship of a deity. 



To say that a deity is required to have a religion is like saying that only Valencia oranges can make orange juice: sure, it helps, but it's not the only thing out there.


After death, do we not rejoin the Force? Isn't this basic Jediism?


In the United Jedi Council, we actually accept that God exists, and we hold services (albeit small ones right now) to honor all that is divine, and to teach that the conceptualized God that many choose to follow is incorrect, because such an idea is far too limiting to what God actually is. Therefore, we have service to and worship of a deity.


Creation of the universe: we accept the Big Bang as a great and valid theory. But where did the energy for that come from? We view this as an Act of God, and therefore metaphysical in nature. The more we look, the closer to God we get. Perhaps you don't accept that the universe was created? Perhaps you don't think it "came from" anywhere? Something cannot come from nothing; even energy must follow rules.


We have met these three requirements without issue.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

2. A Recognized Creed and Form of Worship.



We in fact have a liturgical handbook in our organization which serves to elucidate this. Not all organizations have this, nor do most accept ours. But the fact of its existence seems to fly in the face of this argument.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

3. A Definite and Distinct Ecclesiastical of Government. 


To be clear we are stating a body which governs as defined by a specific deity. In other words a type of Church or even a theocracy. Within the fiction of Star Wars one would no doubt look at the Jedi Council and the Jedi Temple itself as this foundation of Ecclesiastical Government. 



To use this "body which governs as defined by a specific deity" means that nobody can really follow this, and so that part of your definition is invalidated on its face. Could you elaborate more fully on what you mean?


In the United Jedi Council (the organization I'm with at the moment) we do in fact have two sides: a secular board which deals with legalities, and a religious council which governs internal matters such as member discipline and teaching. This council isn't fully fleshed out, admittedly, but the structure is there, and not un-similar to that found in the fiction--though hardly identical. While we don't govern everyone in Jediism, to deny that this in fact meets your requirement wouldn't make sense.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

4. A Formal Code of Doctrine and Discipline.



We agree that this is met.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

5. A Distinct Religious History.



There is conditional agreement (per the conditions you set forth) that this is met.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

6. A Membership Not Associated with any Other Church or Denomination.



This is iffy at best. There are plenty of "fence-sitters" out there who in fact practice multiple faiths. We can't control everyone. And in the United Jedi Council, we don't try to. We have in fact allowed members to retain their prior affiliations, though there are plenty who practice Jediism as their sole religious path.


I should know this, because I'm one of them. And I have been since 1996.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

7. A Set of Beliefs Concerning the Cause, Nature, and Purpose of the Universe.



You really kinda missed the point on this one... in the "broad side of the barn" sense of missing. Generally, the cause is the creation (what causes the universe to exist, etc.), and so that's covered.


The nature of the universe is something debated hotly, even in Christian circles. There is a definite nature, but who do we listen to?


The purpose of the universe is also hotly debated, even within religious groups.


In our organization, we in fact accept that the true nature of the universe is experiential, based on experiences and preferences, and that the purpose of the universe is to gain experiences which allow us to understand ourselves (and thus, allow God to understand God).


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

8. A Literature of Its Own.



Undeniably met.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

9. Established Places of Worship.



So far, there have been several attempts at this, but with a lack of monetization in the community, there is a huge issue with meeting this.


However, we gather in places like parks, forests, living rooms, and even others' churches in order to conduct our worship services.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

10. Ritual Observance of Faith; Holidays.



Buddhism lacks these, in general. Some lineages have observances, but these are largely considered secular. Buddhism seeks to honor and accept these as they are, and some traditions of Buddhism even say that it's beneficial to attend worship services for things like Easter and Christmas.


The United Jedi Council takes a view similar to this, as we don't have a long history of centuries to mark any significant occasions the way that the Christians, Jews, and others do. Events of significant impact might even include May 4th ("May the Fourth be with you!") and May 25th (anniversary of the 1977 opening of Star Wars). But the simple fact is, we don't have a long list of martyrs or similar occasions, and these will likely take centuries to develop.


This isn't to say that we don't honor these days at a personal level; but there is not in fact enough history (however distinctive ours might be) to justify creating any holy days at this point.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

11. Regular Religious Services.



Our last devotional was on August 4th. Before that, we had one on July 17th. We also had services on June 14th, June 3rd, May 14th, April 25th, and quite a few before that (I don't recall all of the dates off the top of my head).


This is about every 2 weeks, and it's as we can manage to do it. I think this actually counts for "regular" in spite of the variance of the schedule.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

12. Schools for the Religious Instruction of the Young.



Jedi School has a Juvenile Education Program specifically for those under 16. The United Jedi Council has a Youth Auxiliary which is for the same purpose, though its structure is quite different.


Met.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

13. Schools for the Preparation of Its Ministers.



Clergy may be trained at Jedi School, the Church of Jediism (in the UK), the United Jedi Council, and a few other web sites. A school doesn't have to be a building (as many online colleges can attest).


Requirement met.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

In the end we can see multiple reason as to why Jediism is just not an actual religion.



You still haven't quite made your case.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

And it definitely should not be accounted as an actual religion.



Opinion, bias, etc., counts for clarity, and is the final conclusion which is restated several times throughout your rant.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

The Jedi Path is a lifestyle choice.



Also true.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

It is a way of life that offers some philosophical ideals on how to proceed in life and seeks to help others on the way.



Partial truth... incomplete at best.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

The Force is the only metaphysical element and that we can see as basic energy (energy in multiple forms, kinetic, thermal, etc.).



We can also see it as the primary energy of the soul, and thus metaphysical on its face.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

There is no deity, there is no form of worship, no prayers, no holy book.



Unfortunately for you, not really the case. We have demonstrated that the United Jedi Council does, in fact, have all of these aspects (though not all Jediists agree that these should be included).


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

The Jedi Path does not dictate or even speculate on the creation of the universe or what happens when one dies.



"Rejoining the Force" notwithstanding.


"Big Bang" also excluded.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

A Jedi in general is free to seek those answers in their own way in their own time. This is the essence of any religion, having core and concrete ideals about what happens when one dies; as well as how the universe was created.



And how odd that I was able to easily explain these after seeing this post a mere 2 hours ago (as quickly as I could sign up for a new account and write a response).


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Instead the Jedi is a philosophy that fits closer to Stoicism, there are ideals on how to live and the proper way to live. But these do not ensure ever-lasting life, they do not grant you karma points, it simply means, when you die, you do so as a Jedi.



Oh, so... there is no causality in nature (karma)? There is no continuance of the soul as it rejoins the collective Force (ever-lasting life)? These things are subjective at best, to be sure, but your definitions are a little tenuous.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

The core aspects of any religion, including Atheism, are missing in the Jedi Path.



Patently untrue, as demonstrated above.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

The Jedi Path is a guideline of living as a Jedi. It is about a healthy mind and body, about helping others to help themselves. It is about doing the right thing, simply because it is the right thing to do, nothing more. You do not help others because you will get something in return, you do not help others because you are emotionally compelled too (compassion), you help others because they are in need of help.



Isn't this also how Taoism and Mahayana Buddhism see it? Karma is something brought in from Hinduism, rather than being one of the Buddha's teachings, but when you look at it closely, it boils down to basic cause-and-effect reality (which I'm sure you have no issue with).


Therefore, for those who do NOT feel compelled to help, isn't it beneficial to teach them about  basic causality and demonstrate that those who do good things are likely to have others do good things for them?


Compassion is a motivator, certainly, but it's far from the only one. Rules rely on principles, my friend, and that's just how the universe works. Rules are merely our interpretations of the principles--a map of the principles themselves. A map of New Zealand will never be New Zealand--it's always going to be based on the real place that is New Zealand. Rules rely on principles in reality, and no matter how we elucidate and clarify those rules, they will also be based on principles.


So while it's nice to say that we'd help someone who is in need of help (and many of us do, including you), there is still an underlying motive in helping someone, however altruistic our actions might be. We might simply do it for the pleasure of knowing we helped--but isn't that a motivator and a reward?


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

It is simply a Path one walks in life. Religion? Absolutely not. And anyone who claims it as a religion, uses that for personal gains (such as suing companies and job centers), such individuals are definitely not Jedi (in any sense of the word). We are Jedi, that simply means we live by the philosophical ideology of the Jedi Knights as seen in Star Wars.



Your bias in this regard might have historical application, but it's hardly conclusive. How are people using the United Jedi Council for personal gain? Or Jedi School? Or Jedi Church? Or any of the other dozens of religious Jediism sites out there?


You lack a basic understanding of what kind of work has gone into both sides of this argument, and you clearly know only one side of it. But the reality is that Jediism as a religion is in fact a qualified religion (this is the case in many groups that practice it).


So, whether you agree or disagree, it has met the minimum requirements to be a religion under most laws, and so your argument really doesn't quite hold up.


So give me something more concrete, and please DO some research before you post something like this.


Mar 25, 2010 -- 9:51PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Remember, one can be a real Jedi in today's society. It takes years of study, training, and practice, but it is more than possible. People have been living as Jedi for years. It is not their religion, it does not define their views on the after-life or the creation of the universe. It is simply how they have chosen to live their lives.



I have been practicing on my own since 1996, when an old woman asked me what I found sacred, and my response was: "Star Wars!"


It is my religion, Opie.


It does in fact define many of my views.


Go watch the films again, and take notes.

Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 14, 2012 - 7:04AM #6
Redheron
Posts: 10

May 9, 2012 -- 2:07AM, Opiemacleod wrote:


Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

I think the question is trickier than it may first appear.



It is really not. It is an issue of divinity. The Jedi has no supernatural element. - The Force? A name applied to a variety of beliefs admittedly, not a singular entity in and of itself. Meaning people use it to replace existing beliefs or be synonymous with an establish belief. The Jedi have no actual spiritual (divine) basis. And despite Jediism's death grip against it, this is actually a good thing and why so many can relate to the ideals within the Jedi Philosophy. And why it should be treated as a philosophy rather than a religion, because it is supplemental.


 


But you also lack the issue of divinity in Buddhism, yet in Taoism the Tao itself is considered divine in nature. You claim that Jediism is more like "Taoism or Stoicism" in nature, without really understanding the basic nature of the Tao. And really, stoicism? Hardly. Were that the case, the characters in the films would be far less exaggerated. Obi-Wan couldn't have shouted at Anakin. And our practices would seek to limit emotional expression through reason (which it doesn't). We in fact tend to learn to embrace our emotional sides, in most of the training I've seen in the online community.


The Jedi do in fact have a deeply spiritual basis, in that the Force can guide us and allow us to have knowledge of the spiritual. I have spent 10 years teaching people about the spiritual side of the Force (though to be fair, I did take about a 4-year hiatus with all of the stupid crappy drama in the community in 2004/05/06/07).


So what about those of us who practice something that isn't supplemental, but instead primary? Are we to be rejected from the community that you so obviously control? Seriously, you don't even speak for a majority of the community on that point. And while you may disagree, there are those of us who have practices which fly in the face of your argument.


May 9, 2012 -- 2:07AM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

Buddhism, for example, is more philosophy than faith for many of its followers, yet Buddhism is considered a major religion.


 


To the layman perhaps. But that is a gross misunderstanding of Buddhism and the various sects that exist within Buddhism. Even the most know, and more philosophical in the eyes of Westerns, Zen Buddhism is very religious dealing specifically with what happens when you die and obtaining ways to reach the desired goal within the religion. And has very specific religious rituals to obtain a specific spiritual/divine goal.


Jediism does not have this.



No, but Jediism does in fact have its own philosophies to obtain spiritual goals (though not those after death, since our souls merely rejoin the Force).


Don't tell me you've never heard of this, as it's been discussed openly for at least 7 years that I'm aware of.


May 9, 2012 -- 2:07AM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

a growing number of people refer to themselves as 'Christian', who neither believe the Gospel accounts nor regularly attend church services.


 


And yet they hold to the ideals expressed the Religion and more importantly they believe in a God which denotes an ideal of not only an after-life but a general idea on how and who created the universe. Perhaps not as described in their holy book, but indeed a belief in a deity. As the point above - the Jediism does not have this.



I refuted this in my previous post.


May 9, 2012 -- 2:07AM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

So, in that context an active Jedi practitioner is practicing his 'religion' just as much as someone in a culurally-recognized religion.


 


No, they are practicing a philosophical concept in which they are exploring spiritual concepts under a name that detaches itself from the misconceptions of religions. This frees an individual to explore religious concepts without having to prescribe to a specific religion. They explore concepts of God, of Divinity, but they do not find the answers within the Jedi Path. For the Jedi Path offers nothing on Creation, After-Life, Deities, and so forth. Instead the Jedi Path says - be objective, acquire knowledge, be patient, be honest with yourself, remove the misconceptions and negative ideas you have and look with fresh eyes on old ideas. Now - what is YOUR conclusion.

This is not religion or a religious practice. This is simply helping an individual find their own spiritual well-being. So again, we see another clear example of Jedi not being a Religion in any sense, but instead an ideology that endorse spiritual well-being among physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Which Jediism forgets 9 times out of 10.



Depends on which organization you're with, I guess. Ours focuses very clearly on these and other points. And yet you deny it because you're comfortable with the organizations you're with, and clearly haven't done the research to prove your claims, with actual data.


You want to be reasonable, yet you do not engage in the discourse of reason; but instead that of bias and assumption.


May 9, 2012 -- 2:07AM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Apr 12, 2012 -- 4:40PM, SecondSonOfDavid wrote:

Also, you are aware I am sure, that IRS codes regarding religion focus on commercial practices and revenue, not validity of belief.


 


And yet people have and still do use it as an argument for saying Jediism is a valid Religion. Thus there should be a document exploring that angle. The IRS Code 501c(3) also includes animal charities among other things. So yes it is a broad classification meant simply to organization United States income filings. Still a recognition must be made.



Read IRS Form 1023 sometime. "Religious Organization" is one spot among many. Therefore, filing as a religious organization is one indicator that an organization might actually be a religion.


What makes something religious isn't your opinion about whether or not it is; what makes it religious is whether or not the followers of the religious side of things believe that it's religious. YOU are the one doing a disservice, here, Opie. You lack the basic supporting information which someone might mistake for reason, but the reality here is that there ARE people who practice Jediism as a religion and as a religious choice, as well as people like you who merely take it as a life philosophy and limit it there.


To deny that this is a reality is to deny that anyone has a right to practice it as their religious choice. And in that sense, it does in fact come down to basic issues of political religious freedom.


People do practice it as a religion. Your argument is invalid.


One more point of interest: the items you gave in the previous post that determine whether or not something is or isn't a religion are general terms, and not all of them are required. In fact, a great many religions in the world don't conform to all of those, for example the Catholic Church, whose eclesiastical government was based on Roman political structure more than on any deity's decree. History demonstrates that their aim was to promote Catholicism in Europe, and as such it had little to do with any kind of spiritual aim, beyond the mere expansion of numbers.


Practicality has a great deal more to do with religious organizations than spirituality; and this is perhaps where a lot of religious groups go wrong. But the reality of religion in Jediism continually eludes you, and as such you will always have stress when someone calls it a "religion" because you seem to think that only Christians and Jews (and perhaps Muslims) have religions.


You deny Buddhism's religious side completely (and as someone with 3 years at a Buddhist monastery, and 2 more years studying under a spiritual master as a disciple, I think I'm qualified to say that). Your denials and lack of acceptance imply that you are trying to control something, in spite of the fact that things don't really go according to the plan you have.


So which of us is using Jediism for personal aims? Probably, we both are (I will neither confirm nor deny something that I haven't really thought about), but I think in this case there is a clear case for your attempting to control whether or not people who practice religious Jediism are in fact permitted to call it religious.


This argumentation is entirely based on assumptive bias, and doesn't really have all of the facts together.

Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 14, 2012 - 3:10PM #7
Opiemacleod
Posts: 21

But you have also constantly denied anyone else's right to believe what they will, in spite of claiming to be in favor of upholding everyone's rights.



Incorrect. As a note, it is hypocritical to claim one is bias, that one does not seek out information, that one does not research data, and use solid sources, and then turn around and do the same.


My description of Religion as a Misconception in the Jedi Circle proves that my stance is clear. One is free to claim what they wish. That is the point. However claiming to be a purple people eater doesn't make it so. Same with Jediism.


I have never met anyone who believes this, honestly.



It lacks structure because you don't have experience in it? How interesting. Fact is I have meet people who hold this view. It is an interesting one. And people are free to have it.


As a religious Jediist who has practiced since 1996, I find your arguments poignant, but lacking in basic informational structure in a great many cases.



I am sure.


But you do in fact take issue with the freedom to claim Jediism as a religious point of view.



Is that why I have taught, hung out, trained under, and had friendships with Jediists? Is that why I have welcomed them, had discussions with them, and enjoyed each others company? Because I take issue with the freedom of speech and freedom of belief?


Christianity is not the only religion in the world.



You are projecting. And as such you are working from a flawed premise.


Taoism is in fact practiced as a religious ideology



That it is. It also has a philosophical following such does not delve into the religious aspects. You find may who hold this view all over. In fact, jump on over to the Taoism forums here. You'll see the division between the two. This isn't a shock or an unknown to anyone who has studied the path.


You are arguing against US law, and then in favor of UK law, wherever it suits your purpose. Your issue is now political, my friend.



Or it could be I pointed out facts. And because they do not fair you, you claim bias. Doesn't really work that way. Fact is people misused US Law to try to prove they are an "official" religion. They than ignored when they were written off in UK law. Doesn't have to with lobbies. Because validity speaks for itself, the fact Scientology needed powerful lobbies speaks volumes. Buddhism does not, Taoism does not, Atheism does not.


Also - you made a quip about my research abilities. You may want to work on that yourself ;) Better argument to be had than the one you present.


The Force is not a sentient deity, but Jediism is still religious in nature.



Says you. Other Jedi and Jediists do not agree. *shrugs* Such is the nature of the path.


It is ALSO a valid lifestyle choice



Didn't say it wasn't. Simply pointed out it is not a religion and I do not agree with it being labeled such. Being a religion or not does not validate or invalidate the path. Which is clearly my point. You may want to take some deep breaths.


After death, do we not rejoin the Force? Isn't this basic Jediism?



It is not. That is my point. =) Do many believe that sure? Absolutely. Do many people differently? Absolutely. The beauty of the Jedi Path. I love it, embrace it, I think our diversity is a wonderful thing.


In the United Jedi Council



=) This is going to go to almost all your points hereafter: In one group out of many. That is great that is excellent. I am glad you guys have found something that works for you. But to presume you speak for the entirety of the Jedi Community? One group does not make it a reality. Is that not how you feel about my own claims? Two-way street.


It is excellent that your group has tackled these issues. And found consensus among them. However nt all Jedi hold to this. Not all Jedi feel comfortable with it. There are many Jedi which have a much different take. One group does not get to speak for all.


To use this "body which governs as defined by a specific deity" means that nobody can really follow this, and so that part of your definition is invalidated on its face. Could you elaborate more fully on what you mean?



Actually many meet this, the easiest and most notable example would be the Vatican. Of course my example given also seemed ot clarify the issue. And secondly, you went on to answer it so I doubt elaboration is truly needed.


And again - you do not speak for all of Jediism. If have a singular group. Which - hey excellent if you meet all the requirements. But that does not give claim to the entirety of the Jedi Community, nor even the entirety of Jediism.


though there are plenty who practice Jediism as their sole religious path.



Two things. 1.) Are you sure you don't try to control them? Would a Jedi still be able to advance within and be a part of group without conforming to your belief system?


2.) There are plenty that practice Jediism as their sole religion. That is never denied. Simply not a religion is my point. Again, doesn't mean one can't say it, just means I do not agree with them saying it. *shrugs*


there is not in fact enough history (however distinctive ours might be) to justify creating any holy days at this point.



I absolutely agree.


And how odd that I was able to easily explain these after seeing this post a mere 2 hours ago



haha That is one way of looking at it. You do fall short, even with using your only source avaliable United Jedi Council. But *shrugs* it would just be circles here on out. Or I could point your lack of knowledge, research, and understanding. We could start citing sources and debating religions that their forums cannot even agree on. But again, circular and not the point.


Like the rest it would just be justification and personal defense. Since you took this very personal. You are free to believe what you wish, especially abut me, are you wrong? Sure, but that is the nature of the beast. Personally I wish you had approached this more with the understanding that you have taken on the mantle of being the main Representative of the Jedi Religion.


Likewise you missed a fundamental element in my writing - to get the other side. If I wanted to simply have a one-sided commentary on the idiocy of the Jedi Religion I can accomplish that in a variety of ways - it certainly wouldn't require a message board. However this is posted in various places which would offer the opportunity of discussion, to present a counter-view. It is offered up openly in places of discussion both in the Jedi Community and in places of religious discussion. Not sure why you didn't consider that.


Personally I find it a shame you spent so much time on me. It reflects more that Jediism is a very defensive and petty practice - after all you are quite the high ranking leader are you not? A clear representative of the Jedi Religion. The good points presented keep getting washed under your attempts to come after me personally.


I view it as a great opportunity to learn more. It get answers on core issues. To see where Jediists fall within hot topics within the religious sector. Knowledge, Objectivity, Learning, Growth, Understanding, all core aspects of the Jedi Path. I have offered up that chance. I have studied at Jediism sites, I have questioned Jediists, I have met with them offline, trained with them, but I am one person. Can't count on everyone seeking out the other side as much as I have. And I still do not agree with it being labeled a Religion, especially when such try to blanket that across the entire Jedi Community.


Thus why not offer a tough platform to provide core issues to be looked at and discussed? Why wouldn't I present my own view understanding, and concepts within? Discussion. *shrugs* United Jedi Council sounds lovely - I still do not agree as even you did and must admit there is simply not a general consensus in Jediism on the main issues that your singular group has worked out.


Side note - I have seen Jediism groups respond to this by doing exactly what your group has done (before now, to clarify). They saw the points, addressed them within their group, and sought to build upon them. A great thing - so while fuming at this, remember it has a point, a purpose, and a use for all sides. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 14, 2012 - 3:17PM #8
Sacrificialgoddess
Posts: 9,496

Wow, Opie. You spent a lot more time on the Jedi religion than I would have bothered to.

Dark Energy. It can be found in the observable Universe. Found in ratios of 75% more than any other substance. Dark Energy. It can be found in religious extremists, in cheerleaders. To come to the conclusion that Dark signifies mean and malevolent would define 75% of the Universe as an evil force. Alternatively, to think that some cheerleaders don't have razors in their snatch is to be foolishly unarmed.

-- Tori Amos
Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 14, 2012 - 3:45PM #9
Opiemacleod
Posts: 21

haha! Yeah. I was rather obessed for awhile. All a bit sad really. =) Fortunately I grew-up and out of that. I am much more accepting now. After-all I believe Acceptance is Peace. And I am quiet happy to let people draw their own conclusions. Plus all that time training and studying Jediism was taking away from things I should have been working on. So lesson learned. 


But your one line comment I feel makes the most potential point. haha And a nice reminder to me. So thank you for throwing it in. Laughing

Quick Reply
Cancel
10 months ago  ::  Aug 15, 2012 - 7:10AM #10
Redheron
Posts: 10

Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

But you have also constantly denied anyone else's right to believe what they will, in spite of claiming to be in favor of upholding everyone's rights.


 


Incorrect. As a note, it is hypocritical to claim one is bias, that one does not seek out information, that one does not research data, and use solid sources, and then turn around and do the same.


 


The source I used was your own post, and utilized my own group to demonstrate the differences. This was done to demonstrate the basic need for well-researched data, and the criticism itself is invalidated by the sweeping generalizations which are made, seemingly without exception. The issue I take with the post is validated because I use my own personal data to demonstrate a lack of applicability in all cases.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

My description of Religion as a Misconception in the Jedi Circle proves that my stance is clear. One is free to claim what they wish. That is the point. However claiming to be a purple people eater doesn't make it so. Same with Jediism.



"Jedi Circle"? I'm not sure what you mean by this... do you mean the at-large community as a whole (the "sphere" or entire population or one group...? Could you elaborate on meaning on this)?


And so... if I claim that I practice Jediism as essentially religious, does that not mean that the application of Jediism in my own case is religious?


Would this not allow Jediism to be religious in nature, at least in some cases?


And thus, by proxy, would this not permit Jediism to be religious in nature, but not mandated as religious?


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

It lacks structure because you don't have experience in it? How interesting. Fact is I have meet people who hold this view. It is an interesting one. And people are free to have it.



I wasn't saying it lacked structure on those grounds; I was pointing out the lack of data which would support your side of the argument from my own perspective. The structure is fine; it's the lacking data which is at issue.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

As a religious Jediist who has practiced since 1996, I find your arguments poignant, but lacking in basic informational structure in a great many cases.



I am sure.



"Basic informational structure" means "supporting data" in this case. Sorry I wasn't more clear.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

But you do in fact take issue with the freedom to claim Jediism as a religious point of view.



Is that why I have taught, hung out, trained under, and had friendships with Jediists? Is that why I have welcomed them, had discussions with them, and enjoyed each others company? Because I take issue with the freedom of speech and freedom of belief?



No, it's because you attack the fundamental right of sentient human beings to self-declare what they find sincerely religious in nature, and at the core of your argument is a need to control whether or not someone ELSE might be willing to practice Jediism as religious.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Christianity is not the only religion in the world.



You are projecting. And as such you are working from a flawed premise.



The flaw is one I am illustrating as an extrapolation (an assumptive bias, in this case) from your own arguments. You seem to be arguing in the prior post about "religion" in a way which might only apply in a Christian sense--I don't see it as applicable to, say, Judaism or Buddhism, neither of which are really monolithic organizations, but it does apply entirely to Catholicism and to many (but far from "all" or even "most") Christian organizations which exist in Europe and North America (and in Australia and New Zealand, for that matter).


Again, the projection is an illustration of what you've implied without saying so, and yes: I'm taking a liberty here, simply to show the ideas which might result from really thinking about what you're saying.


I intentionally skipped the intermediate step of asking for clarification on that one, because I wanted to clearly demonstrate the assumptive bias in a way which made it obvious (however illogical that might seem).


It is not, therefore, a flawed premise, but instead a ploy to draw out the true nature of your intent, and yet you neatly avoided doing exactly that.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Taoism is in fact practiced as a religious ideology



That it is. It also has a philosophical following such does not delve into the religious aspects. You find may who hold this view all over. In fact, jump on over to the Taoism forums here. You'll see the division between the two. This isn't a shock or an unknown to anyone who has studied the path.



Again, this is an illustration to demonstrate that there is a division in Jediism which does not need to exist. We need only to accept that one anothers' positions are at least valid, and therefore to avoid the unnecessarily biased viewpoints, so that we can get on with the more important points.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

You are arguing against US law, and then in favor of UK law, wherever it suits your purpose. Your issue is now political, my friend.



Or it could be I pointed out facts. And because they do not fair you, you claim bias. Doesn't really work that way. Fact is people misused US Law to try to prove they are an "official" religion. They than ignored when they were written off in UK law. Doesn't have to with lobbies. Because validity speaks for itself, the fact Scientology needed powerful lobbies speaks volumes. Buddhism does not, Taoism does not, Atheism does not.


Also - you made a quip about my research abilities. You may want to work on that yourself ;) Better argument to be had than the one you present.



Actually, as I recall, the main reason for Buddhism and Taoism to be included is the mere volume of voters who in fact practice these long-standing traditions.


All new religious movements in history face periods of denial and persecution--it's just what happens. To cite this as evidence that it's invalid is to ignore the history of new religious movements, such as Christianity before 150AD.


History tends to be a far better indicator of what we can expect than politics. Jediism is still considered irreligion in the UK (for those who don't know, irreligion tends to blanket most new religious movements which have not proved that they are sincere in what they beleive, and includes groups like Pastafarianism and the Church of the Subgenious, both of which were lumped together with Jediism in the UK law we are referring to).


There are in fact many arguments I might be able to offer. But the fact is that I'm trying to poke holes where the weaknesses are obvious in order to strengthen the argument, or to topple it. If it strengthens (which is ideal), then the validity of the point is clear and the arguments against it become much more difficult to make.


So far, I'm still just trying to understand the point of view; this isn't even to the point of really getting into the underlying principles on which the arguments are based, which is likely to come later (if it comes).


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

The Force is not a sentient deity, but Jediism is still religious in nature.



Says you. Other Jedi and Jediists do not agree. *shrugs* Such is the nature of the path.



While true, you didn't really address the nature of the argument I made, which is to reduce the sweeping generalizations you had made previously.


There are some who want the Force to be a sentient deity, but these tend to be in the VAST minority.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

It is ALSO a valid lifestyle choice



Didn't say it wasn't. Simply pointed out it is not a religion and I do not agree with it being labeled such. Being a religion or not does not validate or invalidate the path. Which is clearly my point. You may want to take some deep breaths.



There is where I'm trying to get to: you believe that you should have the final say over what is or isn't a religion? There are religions (such as Taoism, by your own admission above) which have both religious and philosophical paths. Why can we not have both?


In my experience, such denials are usually based in either pride or fear. In your case, I would guess (and it IS a guess, so we'll see how correct or incorrect I am) that it's a combination of both: pride because you believe that people can be "above" religion (and thus religion is somehow less than other ideals); and fear that if we accept Jediism as a religion that it will cause the same harm that monolithic structures such as the Catholic Church have visited on the populations it directly controlled throughout history. Or perhaps it's more than that, it's the basic tendency of so-called "Christian Relief" organizations to require children to say that they accept Christ in order to receive aid in the form of food or basic medicine.


These are simply counter to the teachings of Christ, and so the issue here is not religion, but organizations of religion which seek control above charity (which is at the core of Christ's teachings, and which I consider the true beauty of Christianity).


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

After death, do we not rejoin the Force? Isn't this basic Jediism?



It is not. That is my point. =) Do many believe that sure? Absolutely. Do many people differently? Absolutely. The beauty of the Jedi Path. I love it, embrace it, I think our diversity is a wonderful thing.



I agree that our diversity is our strength, but your strong argument seemed to deny any consideration that religious application might be valid.


That is why I argue; not because I think you're wrong, but because I see an absolute that I cannot accept as valid (very few absolutes are valid, and those which are valid tend to be obvious in nature).


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

In the United Jedi Council



=) This is going to go to almost all your points hereafter: In one group out of many. That is great that is excellent. I am glad you guys have found something that works for you. But to presume you speak for the entirety of the Jedi Community? One group does not make it a reality. Is that not how you feel about my own claims? Two-way street.


It is excellent that your group has tackled these issues. And found consensus among them. However nt all Jedi hold to this. Not all Jedi feel comfortable with it. There are many Jedi which have a much different take. One group does not get to speak for all.



I understand this. But to say "it must never be a religion" flies in the face of this one organization's hard work to the contrary. And there are others which also take a religious view. Should these organizations be denied the same basic benefits that religious groups have, based on your say-so?


For example, the right to believe? The right to self-determine what is or is not held as a sincerely religious belief (as is the case in the First Amendment, according to the US Supreme Court and several Acts of Congress over the last 236 years)?


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

To use this "body which governs as defined by a specific deity" means that nobody can really follow this, and so that part of your definition is invalidated on its face. Could you elaborate more fully on what you mean?



Actually many meet this, the easiest and most notable example would be the Vatican. Of course my example given also seemed ot clarify the issue. And secondly, you went on to answer it so I doubt elaboration is truly needed.


And again - you do not speak for all of Jediism. If have a singular group. Which - hey excellent if you meet all the requirements. But that does not give claim to the entirety of the Jedi Community, nor even the entirety of Jediism.



Nor do you. The case I am making is that your denial that any group "should" claim religious adherence implies your own control over the decisions of those organizations, as you did not frame many of your arguments as opinions, but as fact.


The issue I took was one of definition. I was confused by what you were actually trying to say, since you seemed to be implying that any such body was invalid. The extreme position that I intentionally took was one of trying to demonstrate that no body in the world ACTUALLY takes its authority from any deity, as all of them (the Catholics, Mormons, and Muslims all included, but hardly ending there) began with human authority which was then somehow divinely authorized, and then expanded upon by humans, sometimes over centuries.


Historically speaking, even the Vatican's ecclesiastical government said that its authority came from Peter the Apostle (also called Saint Peter), who was blessed by Christ, who didn't really set up any particular organization to follow his teachings.


But then, let's look at the religious structure of, say, Buddhism: the Buddha said that we should honor the wisdom and not the teacher. It was the Buddha's disciples who set up the continued teachings which eventually became Buddhism.


But now to the real question: is the Buddha a deity? Is Christ? Some in both paths believe it to be so. Would you deny their right to accept these people as a deity?


It's the same argumentation about religion: some people accept it as a religion; others do not. We should allow the religious groups the right to be religious, while not requiring the philosophical groups to fall under the same aegis.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

though there are plenty who practice Jediism as their sole religious path.



Two things. 1.) Are you sure you don't try to control them? Would a Jedi still be able to advance within and be a part of group without conforming to your belief system?



There are many groups where that would be the case. In my own group, religious adherence is necessary for members to advance. Though there are exceptions to this rule: if someone were to join as a member organization, we have instituted a policy of guaranteeing that each organization is free to determine its own systems, which don't have to be religious in nature. If that's control, then so be it. But I have a hard time classifying it as such because of the broad exceptions which are throughout our policy.


And we're one organization, among... how many? 50 or so, globally?


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

2.) There are plenty that practice Jediism as their sole religion. That is never denied. Simply not a religion is my point. Again, doesn't mean one can't say it, just means I do not agree with them saying it. *shrugs*



Ah, now THIS is rational! Your opinions are your own, and it's perfectly valid to have them. Where the issue was raised was in the strong wording that seemed to imply that there was no leeway to disagree with you.


The points raised in such a case were to illustrate this point alone, because (as the crying student pointed out) it seemed that "this guy says that Jediism can't possibly be a religion".


Unfortunately for her, she was in a vulnerable state as she read it, having dealt with something in her psychotherapy session that I can't disclose here for the sake of her privacy. But to make a long story short, she wasn't in a stable frame of mind, and the strong wording is not well-justified.


EDIT: Those who do not know much about Jediism in THIS community might actually take your words to heart without consideration, and in such a case it should not be allowed to stand, especially where a counterpoint clearly exists in the community as a whole (even if not everyone is on the same side of the argument). There isn't really a Jedi Council that oversees everything: we're a democracy, though there are many who would disagree even with that. The counterpoint raised is at least as valid as the opinions it was meant to oppose.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

And how odd that I was able to easily explain these after seeing this post a mere 2 hours ago



haha That is one way of looking at it. You do fall short, even with using your only source avaliable United Jedi Council. But *shrugs* it would just be circles here on out. Or I could point your lack of knowledge, research, and understanding. We could start citing sources and debating religions that their forums cannot even agree on. But again, circular and not the point.



Well, it wasn't my ONLY source available... it was the only one I chose to use, LOL.


The IRS might disagree with you on the "falling short" part of it, or they might not. I don't know. The only thing we can do is to put it to the test and see if they accept us as a "religious organization" on Form 1023 (which is expensive).


Not all of the points you raised are required to be a religion. They are merely indicators of religious adherence, and are found in US law more than in other places.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Like the rest it would just be justification and personal defense. Since you took this very personal. You are free to believe what you wish, especially abut me, are you wrong? Sure, but that is the nature of the beast. Personally I wish you had approached this more with the understanding that you have taken on the mantle of being the main Representative of the Jedi Religion.



I have done no such thing. I was in fact pointing out that you were in fact doing that very thing. That's why I had a bawling student call me at 3am and tell me she wasn't sure she could even continue learning from anyone: you were authoritarian in your writing, and I showed only ONE organization's positions, rather than trying to say that it was broadly representative.


This is not an "all or nothing" argument: I'm trying to point out that both sides actually do exist, and that both sides are absolutely valid in their viewpoints, irrespective of whether or not you or I agree or disagree with them.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Likewise you missed a fundamental element in my writing - to get the other side. If I wanted to simply have a one-sided commentary on the idiocy of the Jedi Religion I can accomplish that in a variety of ways - it certainly wouldn't require a message board. However this is posted in various places which would offer the opportunity of discussion, to present a counter-view. It is offered up openly in places of discussion both in the Jedi Community and in places of religious discussion. Not sure why you didn't consider that.



I have considered it.


I am also considering the people in this community who have read the thread and not really considered the alternative points of view. I offered a counter-point to demonstrate that I don't actually think badly of you, but rather that I firmly and strongly disagree with the point of view that you posted with such strength that someone else couldn't tell it wasn't a solid fact, but instead your own opinion.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Personally I find it a shame you spent so much time on me. It reflects more that Jediism is a very defensive and petty practice - after all you are quite the high ranking leader are you not? A clear representative of the Jedi Religion. The good points presented keep getting washed under your attempts to come after me personally.



I did so without you in mind. I did it for the sake of my student.


I demonstrated clearly the lack of applicable authority outside of my organization.


I didn't attack your credibility, as you do mine. I was pointing out that you didn't have all of the facts, and tried to add some doubt as to the acceptability of your tone as factual. If you took that as a personal attack, I'm sorry: that wasn't the intent here.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

I view it as a great opportunity to learn more. It get answers on core issues. To see where Jediists fall within hot topics within the religious sector. Knowledge, Objectivity, Learning, Growth, Understanding, all core aspects of the Jedi Path. I have offered up that chance. I have studied at Jediism sites, I have questioned Jediists, I have met with them offline, trained with them, but I am one person. Can't count on everyone seeking out the other side as much as I have. And I still do not agree with it being labeled a Religion, especially when such try to blanket that across the entire Jedi Community.



I disagree that objectivity is core to the Jedi Path. I believe that knowing how to be both objective and subjective at the same time (e.g., lateral thinking) is far more important than the kind of objectivity which tends reject the subjective.


I agree that the entire Jedi world should not fall under one label (religious, irreligious, or whatever else). But the core (and I might mention vague) definition of religion would seem to apply in many cases. We shouldn't reject the core ideal of allowing those who choose a label for themselves to apply it, nor require a label for those who do not choose it.


I think we're on the same page, here.


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Thus why not offer a tough platform to provide core issues to be looked at and discussed? Why wouldn't I present my own view understanding, and concepts within? Discussion. *shrugs* United Jedi Council sounds lovely - I still do not agree as even you did and must admit there is simply not a general consensus in Jediism on the main issues that your singular group has worked out.



If you presented it as an opinion, that would be a very different discussion. Your strong wording (which is essential for most propaganda, and not so essential for debate) left an impression other than what I now believe you meant.


It was this kind of authoritarian tone which tended to cause problems in other sites with you, too, and almost uniformly with those who wanted to have religious viewpoints (deist or not, still religious in nature).


Aug 14, 2012 -- 3:10PM, Opiemacleod wrote:

Side note - I have seen Jediism groups respond to this by doing exactly what your group has done (before now, to clarify). They saw the points, addressed them within their group, and sought to build upon them. A great thing - so while fuming at this, remember it has a point, a purpose, and a use for all sides. 



Oh, I wasn't fuming. I actually had a great time, as I rather enjoy lively debate. I wasn't intending to anger or attack you, nor to provoke any kind of negative feelings in you. I was intending to get you to understand that perhaps your tone and choices of wording, while very expressive and even convincing to lots of people, might in fact be one of the things driving people away from your arguments and furthering the polarization of the Jedi Community (not a healthy thing).


I see that you and I share a lot of beliefs, and that we disagree on a few things. But all of the minor semantics aside, we both love the community and we both have a great deal of respect for one another (even as we disagree).


There have been a great many groups who have done this in the past (even the old FA from the mid-1990's did this as a result of newsgroup posts), but if we are to administer to a group, then this is what we have to do: adapt.


Diversity is one of our strengths as a broad community; and the most common expression of diversity is adaptation. So while there is in fact a need for different groups to express things differently, there is also a great deal of agreement in what all of the groups believe. Yet I agree that to blanket all groups as one thing or another is to deny the basic right to believe as a relgious group.


Why can we not have it both ways?

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing
    Advertisement

    Beliefnet On Facebook