Christine:

"I posted that because NASA reported the Blue Star Kachinas and it was at the end of the NASA article."

Perhaps you can direct us all to the part of where you linked to that is NASA reporting on the Blue Star Kachina?

May 24, 2013 -- 12:14PM, wohali wrote:

Christine:

"I posted that because NASA reported the Blue Star Kachinas and it was at the end of the NASA article."

Perhaps you can direct us all to the part of where you linked to that is NASA reporting on the Blue Star Kachina?

For what it's worth,

www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=vik0BDEuxuo...

I say for what it's worth because do we really know the TV show was being honest and interviewing a guy from NASA?

May 24, 2013 -- 1:42PM, wohali wrote:

Christine, I asked you to show us the NASA reporting in the original link that you posted.

And your gripes with the government are off topic.

I don't have it anymore.  Asking me if I hate people I have never met, and talking about con-men is off topic.  This is a thread for Native American prophecies.

May 24, 2013 -- 3:03PM, wohali wrote:

Christine:

"I don't have it anymore."

The link is right there in your post #64.

"Asking me if I hate people I have never met, and talking about con-men is off topic."

Responding to you accusing me of hating Robert Ghostwolf and pointing out that links you post and don't know anything about are completely on-topic.

"This is a thread for Native American prophecies."

Ok, you got this part right.

Why don't you go ask Robert Ghostwolf.  You have the NASA video, not good enough?  Too bad.

May 25, 2013 -- 11:25AM, wohali wrote:

Christine:

"Why don't you go ask Robert Ghostwolf."

First of all, he wasn't the one making the posts about this here, you were.

And he died in 2005.

"You have the NASA video, not good enough?"

No, there is just a link to a con-man's website, that you didn't look at before you linked it.

"Too bad."

Seems to be your attitude every time you make silly assertions.

All you needed to say was you don't like Robert Ghostwolf, he's a conman.  Who is arguing with you.  Since I don't know anything about him, I wouldn't have fought you on it.  You're the one all ruffled about it.  I don't see it being a big problem, nobody is disagreeing with you.  But.....now that you tell me that he's a conman, I'm going to look at his website.  I have to be up on who is saying what, you know.