| 6 years ago :: Nov 22, 2007 - 2:55PM #11 | |
|
Assalamu 'alaykum,
I was actually going to say someting similar to what Miraj said. For the people who believe hijab is an obligation, they wear hijab to please God and only because of that. Not to cause scandal, or shock people or anything like that. AND people would be protected by the "freedom of religion" only IF they are Muslims. Someone can't just go sue their employer because he/she feels like she wants to wear a hijab. If you're interested in Islam, I suggest that you start by learning the 5 pillars first and start implementing them in your life before being concerned about things like hijab. I''m not saying it's not important but after seeing so many converts leave Islam in so little I have really come to the conclusion that until someone is able to implement the 5 pillars consistently, we shouldn't be insisting in anything else. And finally, a word of advise to those who think that "sue your boss" is an easy feat. Suing someone is a HUGE expense (I'm saying this out of experience!!). Every time you say "hi" to your lawyer you have to give him anywhere between $150 - $300. Every day he has to go to court you have to give him a minimum of $1,000. So suing your employer is a VERY expensive proposition and takes a lot of time. In addition, proving that you were fired because of your clothing is also not that easy to prove. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 6 years ago :: Nov 22, 2007 - 3:00PM #12 | |
|
Thank you Miraj, Lee Ann and Ceren!
Salaam, Grace |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 6 years ago :: Nov 22, 2007 - 4:56PM #13 | |
Disclaimer: The opinions of this member are not primarily informed by western ethnocentric paradigms, stereotypes rooted in anti-Muslim/Islam hysteria, "Israel can do no wrong" intransigence, or the perceived need to protect the Judeo-Christian world from invading foreign religions and legal concepts. By expressing such views, no inherent attempt is being made to derail or hijack threads, but that may be the result. The result is not the responsibility of this member.![]()
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 6 years ago :: Nov 22, 2007 - 4:59PM #14 | |
Disclaimer: The opinions of this member are not primarily informed by western ethnocentric paradigms, stereotypes rooted in anti-Muslim/Islam hysteria, "Israel can do no wrong" intransigence, or the perceived need to protect the Judeo-Christian world from invading foreign religions and legal concepts. By expressing such views, no inherent attempt is being made to derail or hijack threads, but that may be the result. The result is not the responsibility of this member.![]()
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 6 years ago :: Nov 22, 2007 - 5:11PM #15 | |
|
You got to be a specialist or your just a sad confused soul that doesnt know her "bosom" from her head.
A very astute observation, Lee Ann! Very good for a non-specialist. Disclaimer: The opinions of this member are not primarily informed by western ethnocentric paradigms, stereotypes rooted in anti-Muslim/Islam hysteria, "Israel can do no wrong" intransigence, or the perceived need to protect the Judeo-Christian world from invading foreign religions and legal concepts. By expressing such views, no inherent attempt is being made to derail or hijack threads, but that may be the result. The result is not the responsibility of this member.![]()
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 6 years ago :: Nov 23, 2007 - 4:55AM #16 | |
|
Lee Ann- I dunno, you're kinda out on a limb there....head??? bosum??? can you cite sources for either???
((There is no other lexical sense in which the word khimar may be construed. )) I think using the word "lexical" is supposed to scare us into acknowledging the superior intellect of this point of view. I laugh every time I read that line- because sadly, it's been posted several times already. Miraj, thanks for bringing up the issue of "consensus". That has got to me one of the most abused concepts going right now. And it usually has to do with putting women in their place. Salaam, Grace |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 6 years ago :: Dec 07, 2007 - 12:44AM #17 | |
|
In the Name of the High
assalam o alaykum the whole notion of consencus, i.e Ijma, was borne out of a political necessity first and fore-most. in the absence of a stable political entity in Islam, in post 4 Caliphs, it was mandated as such to the myriad of the different schools that had emanated. regards, ali.q |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 6 years ago :: Dec 12, 2007 - 6:34PM #18 | |
|
Salaam all :)
Nice to see that the hijab issue is still an issue, not that I'm surprised. Hi there Sis Miraj. And of course, I'm still in the don't wear it, never wore it, won't wear it, won't have my daughter wear it group! Re-salaams, Aisha |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Dec 30, 2007 - 11:52PM #19 | |
|
Dear sister,
I like to support what sister Ceren said here. Take it easy and take time to learn more about Islam. Start by practicing it privately. Once you have some knowledge of Islam and start wearing hijab after than, maybe you will be able to remove misunderstanding about Islam from good Christian people. In the noble Qur'an God said Christians are "Nearest to the Muslims" [ Ref: The noble Qur'an 5:82 ] and there is a whole chapter devoted to our spiritual mother Mary [ Chapter 19]. The word "Jesus" was mentioned in the Qur'an 25 times and "Mary" was mentioned 32 time [ 19 times in the Bible]. We pray to the same God of Jesus, Moses, Abraham and Muhammad [ Peace be unto them all] . "And Jesus said to him, "Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone." [ The holy Bible Mark 10:18 ] For more information, please visit the following websites. http://www.welcome-back.org/ http://www.harunyahya.com/ Feel free to ask as many questions about Islam you want. Then start wearing hijab when the time is right. I wish you all the best. May peace and blessings be unto all. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 5 years ago :: Dec 31, 2007 - 1:54AM #20 | |
|
Or, maybe not wear hijab ever.
Disclaimer: The opinions of this member are not primarily informed by western ethnocentric paradigms, stereotypes rooted in anti-Muslim/Islam hysteria, "Israel can do no wrong" intransigence, or the perceived need to protect the Judeo-Christian world from invading foreign religions and legal concepts. By expressing such views, no inherent attempt is being made to derail or hijack threads, but that may be the result. The result is not the responsibility of this member.![]()
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
