recapitulation theory has been totally discredited
You might be interested in the "Your Inner Fish" book, too. It has nothing to do with "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny."
I once saw a show n TV where a hypnosis took people back to their iner fish....he had them flopping around on the stage like a fish just hauled in on the floor of a boat. What a joke.
Do tell us why we should read such nonsense.
"Inner fish"
can't
stop
laughing
Get in touch with your inner fish.
Jesus H. Christ.
Ever read the book? Careful... you might like it! I had 20 freshmen/sophomores read it and they liked it -- that proves it's hard not to like it :)
It didn't take God but a split second in spiritual time to figure out the DNA building blocks of all life on Planet Earth.
For pure evolutionists, life accidently took a very long man-time to develop.
I like that brief, pithy synopsis.
I intend to use it--giving you full credit, of course.
Unless I am convinced by Scripture and plain reason, my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not retract anything, for to go against conscience would be neither right nor safe. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen.
Ever read the book? Careful... you might like it! I had 20 freshmen/sophomores read it and they liked it -- that proves it's hard not to like it :)
No, I haven't. And yes, I would agree with your conclusion :-). But what am I going to learn of value about my "inner fish" (LOL! Even typing the dang thing I'm laughing.)
I'm curious about something--you talk a lot about dignity and human dignity so IYO is a fish equal in dignity to a human?
Of I don't. How 'bout you?
Not at all. But I have, in part, a good reason--revelation. What would be yours?
Unless I am convinced by Scripture and plain reason, my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not retract anything, for to go against conscience would be neither right nor safe. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen.
For pure evolutionists, life accidently took a very long man-time to develop.
I trust a nature that took its time to work out the kinks than just poofing something up without a lot of thought (and don't claim God thought it out, since He's surprised A&E sin, He's surprised Cain kills Abel, and He's shocked that the globe "needs" drowning).
Knock and the door shall open. It's not my fault if you don't like the decor.
Ever read the book? Careful... you might like it! I had 20 freshmen/sophomores read it and they liked it -- that proves it's hard not to like it :)
No, I haven't. And yes, I would agree with your conclusion :-). But what am I going to learn of value about my "inner fish" (LOL! Even typing the dang thing I'm laughing.)
Lots of interesting things! He talks about how different parts of our anatomy evolved, and about the different genes that control development of our bodies while we're embryos, and how other animals have the same genes that work the same way. He also talks about his work finding the famous Tiktaalik, a fossil transitional between fish and amphibians. I learned a new things about anatomy and how our genes control our development.
It didn't take God but a split second in spiritual time to figure out the DNA building blocks of all life on Planet Earth.
For pure evolutionists, life accidently took a very long man-time to develop.
I like that brief, pithy synopsis.
I intend to use it--giving you full credit, of course.
Except that pure evolutionists don't see life as accidental. That is a false witness that many creationists tell. So you're best off not borrowing it, unless you wish to sully your reputation.
There are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth.
God is just a personification of reality, of pure objectivity.
No, I haven't. And yes, I would agree with your conclusion :-). But what am I going to learn of value about my "inner fish" (LOL! Even typing the dang thing I'm laughing.)
Lots of interesting things! He talks about how different parts of our anatomy evolved, and about the different genes that control development of our bodies while we're embryos, and how other animals have the same genes that work the same way. He also talks about his work finding the famous Tiktaalik, a fossil transitional between fish and amphibians. I learned a new things about anatomy and how our genes control our development.
Thanks (really), but I just don't find that exciting enough to explore any further (and I say this as one with a biology background, too)...
My upbringing, education, properly functioning brain, and basic human nature.
This is interesting.
What if one didn't have your "upbringing and education"? Do you think they would reach the same conclusion?
"Properly functioning brain", okay. But Peter Singer I think (most) would argue has a "properly functioning brain" and I don't see where he assigns anything that can be described as "dignity" to humans.
Re "basic human nature", what is that?
Unless I am convinced by Scripture and plain reason, my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not retract anything, for to go against conscience would be neither right nor safe. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen.
It didn't take God but a split second in spiritual time to figure out the DNA building blocks of all life on Planet Earth.
For pure evolutionists, life accidently took a very long man-time to develop.
I like that brief, pithy synopsis.
I intend to use it--giving you full credit, of course.
Except that pure evolutionists don't see life as accidental. That is a false witness that many creationists tell. So you're best off not borrowing it, unless you wish to sully your reputation.
There's a difference between "life accidentally took a long time to develop" and "life is accidental."
There's also a lot of equivocation on the word "accidental."
Unless I am convinced by Scripture and plain reason, my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not retract anything, for to go against conscience would be neither right nor safe. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen.