| 1 year ago :: May 02, 2012 - 3:12PM #71 | |
You're saying that we are in fact all caught up in the jaws of a machine of blind pitiless indifference . . . with an occassional miracle thrown in to comfort us. But why are these miracles - whatever they are - comforting? Let's say someone in Uganda is miraculously cured of cancer. How does that comfort people in Frankfurt? or Barcelona? They wouldn't even hear about it. Wouldn't the real miracle be to eliminate cancer completely from the human population - now that would be comforting to everyone. A couple posts ago you said throwing a football is a miracle because it's matter conforming to will. How does that console anyone - even the person who threw the football? My Ford Fusion is a machine of blind pitiless indifference. I don't need to be comforted because I know that. The Earth revolves around the Sun - why do I need comfort? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 02, 2012 - 3:18PM #72 | |
|
Where is this blind pitiless machine of indifference? That's an odd way to describe the world. I look around and see wonderous forests - alive and vibrant and oceans full of wildlife. The sky is alive with birds, colours and it changes every second. There's life all around us and it's all connected. I don't see a blind pitiless machine of indiffeence and if I did I would be judging out of a selfish ego that the world isn't serving my interests or giving me console. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 02, 2012 - 6:26PM #73 | |
It is the one Richard Dawkins sees: "The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference."
Sex is the mysticism of materialism and the only possible religion in a materialistic society.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 02, 2012 - 6:35PM #74 | |
Perhaps you don't need comfort. It seems that you despise people who do (in your subsequent post), considering them selfish. Nice guy.
Sex is the mysticism of materialism and the only possible religion in a materialistic society.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 02, 2012 - 8:23PM #75 | |
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 02, 2012 - 8:29PM #76 | |
Not at all. I just see that when you view the world in such negative terms as pitiless and mechanistic that you have to look for comfort somewhere or from someone. It's an extremely depressing state of affairs. But if you view the world as positive and in terms of wonder and interconnectedness that that, in itself brings a sense of solace and comfort, in my view. One comes from the need to be reassured by others and the other comes from inner peace and self-confidence. Sorry if my previous posts weren't clear |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 02, 2012 - 9:11PM #77 | |
|
Regardless of what one may say about the ineffable Buggsy, he manages to more than hold his own against Beliefnet's own Certified Public Troll, Little Les (no mean feat, by the way). |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 03, 2012 - 7:01AM #78 | |
RESPONSE: Are you serious? Have you read his posts? Surely Buggy's tactics are familiar to readers. He begins by challenging the qualifications of those who don't agree with his views. A factious example might be if a poster insists that 2 + 2 = 4 and not 2=2 = 5, and Buggsy is maintaining that 2 +2 =5, Buggsy demands that the writer have a PhD in mathmatics as a credential or his argument not be considered on its merits. When his views are challenged, Buggsy fails to offer evidence and regresses to purely ad hominem arguments in which he attacks the poster but avoids the issue and the evidence presented. Finally, realizing that he has no credibale evidence to support his position, he simply withdraws from the dialogue. I wish he'd do it sooner and save readers wasted time reading Buggsy's assertions which can't really be supported. (Of course, "retiring from the field is the best tactic if one cannot really support one's view.) A current example of these tactics is his responses to the present "Forgery in Catholicism" thread. Perhaps this is because the evidence is so clear and there's so much of it. The Troll who documents. But you can call me "TD" |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 03, 2012 - 3:22PM #79 | |
|
Fiction writing is great, you can make up almost anything |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 1 year ago :: May 03, 2012 - 6:34PM #80 | |
RESPONSE: Yes. Presenting evidence takes more time and thought. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|

