| 2 years ago :: Oct 27, 2011 - 4:18AM #1 | |
|
I’m posting this thread, on both the Islamic Forum and Judaism Forum, since it actually applied to both equally. I have known my best friend for nearly 20 years now, he is Jewish and I am Muslim, both of us are not practicing and claim to have invented Halal and Kosher pork. In school nobody actually cared, although there was this one teacher, who occasionally use to make jokes about us, it wasn't till a few years ago we realized how racist it was. (I am not implying that the only Muslim and Jewish friendship can happen between secular people, just implying most people we meet are niether muslims or jews) however whenever we use to meet people outside and our ethnic background came up, they would always be a ‘that’s weird‘ or ‘really?‘ and etc. Most of these people were not Jews or Muslims, I personally believe that people who are shocked or surprised that a Muslim and Jew can be friends are anti-Semitic and Islamophobic. I was wondering what people over here thought, are people who are shocked that a Muslim and Jew can be best friends racist??? (I have actually told a couple of people that were shocked that they were racist)
Is this a weird kind of bigotry, they wouldn't be shocked if we were Black and White, or Straight or Gay? Is this a really weird kind of Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia??? I think it is a racist who looks at Muslims and Jews from the lens of world politics. P.S The Jews and Muslims who are shocked in my opinions are racist as well. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 27, 2011 - 9:19AM #2 | |
|
someone who is surprised at your friendship is not a racist. this person is simply someone who, playing the odds, sees fewer of this connection than of others. I am surprised when I see a man and a woman as the best of friends, with nothing else under the surface. I would be surprised to see people of any two separate cultures, groups, races as the best of friendsw because there is an assumption that if you identify yourself with a group, then you would find more in common with others in that same group. if you didn't think of yourself as jewish, or the friend as muslim (neither of which is a race, BTW) then the friendship would be unremarkable. When you import the potential baggage that the labels include then people raise an eyebrow. but is it inherently unusual? No. people find people and ignore the differences when there are enough similarities. people forge friendships with people, not ideologies. so is considering your friendship strange "racist" (or any other "ist")? nope. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 27, 2011 - 10:57AM #3 | |
|
Hi Ffb, You would be surprised at two people from different racial/ethnic backgrounds being good friends? Please explain your reaction when seeing a biracial or bi-ethnic couple. I understand what you are saying but I don’t think most people are that ethnocentric. I do identify as a Muslim and he identifies as a Jew. Let me give you an example, Both of us have had many people say to us, ‘I think it’s so sweet that you two are friends, specially with what’s going on’ . (or something along those lines) However, a statement such as that implies the norm is that Jews and Muslims are not capable of being friends and thus we are breaking the norm. Would you be surprised that in contemporary South Africa, an Afrikaner (White South African) is best friends with a Black South African? If you are, it means you think all Afrikaners are racist and it is outside their cultural status quo for them to have a black friend. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 27, 2011 - 1:44PM #4 | |
|
" If you are, it means you think all Afrikaners are racist and it is outside their cultural status quo for them to have a black friend." no, it means that knowing that friendship is cast from shared experiences and values, and people from different backgrounds and milieus don't have as much in common, I would be surprised that they either had the opportunity to forge, or the common ground to forge a "best friend." Not "friend" but best. Please do not put words into my mouth. I have many friends - of different religions and races. But my best friend is the one who has shared and continues to share experiences, heritage and values with me. The odds indicate that this is less likely to happen with someone with whom I or anyone else has less initially in common. Thus, it would be unusual. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 27, 2011 - 5:10PM #5 | |
|
Hi there again, I agree and disagree, with some of your points. I agree friendship is based on similar experience. I think background and heritage have nothing to do with it. I think there is a collective experience that people go through, I was lucky we went to the same primary school and then the same secondary school (we weren't the only ones), sometimes we were in the social groups and other times not. It wasn’t best friendship at sight, it was built by circumstances and time. The experience of copying homework, talking about women, discovering music at the same time, alcohol and other shenanigans. These are the collective experiences of certain type of adolescent Western heterosexual male. Almost a ritualistic coming of age, now not all may have done what we have done, but may have done similar or some of those ritualistic things. Faith and ethnicity are non factors. When you grow up, you talk about other collective experiences such as moving out, being unemployed, paying the rent, girlfriends, work politics and etc. These again are collective experiences, not just ours experiences but of the masses. I fear the day of talking about fatherhood on the phone with him. Now I don’t have Muslim written on my forehead (i can pass for many faiths) and he doesn’t have Jew written on his forehead, but we are two men of the same age, and when people find out about our backgrounds, they should not surprised and bring up the middle east. If they are they are implying no matter what background a Muslim and Jew come from, when it comes to the middle east they are monolithic. I believe Israel has a right to exist but not to expand, he believes Palestinians should have their own state and leave violence. He is my best friend I know him, people think deep down he believes Palestinians should not have their own country. I know he does not believe that. I know people believe that deep down I don’t i don't want israel to exist, which is not true. These are modern secular European, who believe no matter what all Jews and Muslims are monolithic on the issue deep inside. That is why they the say stuff like ‘Thats cool that you two are friends’ or ‘What do you think of the mid east problem’. People expect ALL Jews and Muslim to have some outrages hysterical connection to the war in the mid east. My connection is purely cultural, the reason I lean more Palestinian side is because I happen to be born to a Muslim family. I see that and recognize that and am willing to better myself to a more balanced approach. It is the cultural thing first and a humanitarian thing second, because I would be more worried about The madness in Congo, if my priorities were in the right order. I see that and I think most Jews see that as well and are willing to better themselves but god it is hard. If you think Jews and Muslim have some hysterical connection where they are militantly onside or the other, you dear sir or madam are Islamophobic and an Anti-Semite. Basically i am saying some collective experiences are beyond faith, race and heritage. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 27, 2011 - 7:34PM #6 | |
|
"If you think Jews and Muslim have some hysterical connection where they are militantly onside or the other, you dear sir or madam are Islamophobic and an Anti-Semite." I don't recall saying that -- it almost seems that you are looking to find that others are "anti" something instead of assuming that people don't naturally hate but might be naturally curious. You also seem very quick to label. Someone who thinks that there is an innate connection and therefore a zealous interest in one side and not the other as an extension of some element of character is not phobic or anti anything, but simply recognizing basic tendencies as evidenced over time and experience. Don't go looking for hate and blindly throwing about labels. It is as bad a practice as that which you condemn. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 27, 2011 - 8:24PM #7 | |
|
'Someone who thinks that there is an innate connection and therefore a zealous interest in one side and not the other as an extension of some element of character is not phobic or anti anything, but simply recognizing basic tendencies as evidenced over time and experience.' The individual there is stereotyping, and stereotyping is something that I am not comfortably with, again the Afrikaner example(I had a holiday in S.A, Cape Town it is heaven on earth), Should I be surprised or curious if an Afrikaner marries a black person, you know because there is evidence that Afrikaners are racist scum and hate black people. No I should not be surprised or shocked or wonder how this marriage took place, If I do i am bigot. So lets say your new neighbors are an Afrikaner man and a Black women, so you would think wow thats weird, because you know Afrikaners hate Black people. Thats the prevailing stereotype but it is a racist stereotype, because not all Afrikaners are white supremacists. You may not like to admit it but you have had a racist moment there. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 28, 2011 - 1:18AM #8 | |
|
BS"D I don't find it odd that persons from different cultures, genders or beliefs can be best friends. What I do find unusual is the same two persons maintaining their bond of friendship when all their peers are continually preaching hatred towards the other. I have NEVER seen that. I know of NO Muslim who attends a Mosque regularly where there is a 5-times daily chant of "death to the Jews" or which teaches the Qu'ran literally who maintains a friendship with any Jew. There was a several-years-long case-study of two young Israeli classmates (best friends who were Muslim and Jew) demonstrating that phenomenon in a tragic way (became mortal enemies because of religion and politics.) In that regard one who is not a religious Muslim is more likely to maintain such a friendship as nothing in Islam permits such to exist at all AFAIK. In fact, if one can maintain that spark of humanity in the midst of all the hatred in this world there is still hope for future generations to exist at all IMHO. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 28, 2011 - 4:00AM #9 | |
|
Gold, As I said on the other thread, what you have with your friend is precious and exemplary. I'm sure you two would be the first to acknowledge that, strictly statistically speaking, the level of friendship between you gentlemen is uncommon for a Muslim and a Jew. For a third person to express positive surprise and curiosity at such a statistical anomaly is therefore not only completely healthy and understandable, but also a mark of a rational observer. It would be folly to misconstrue such curiosity as anti-anything. No doubt you two have bumped into a fair share of bigots and prejudicial remarks. However, such reactions should not be simplistically confused with the innocent curiosity of others. Perhaps unwittingly your thread-starter (on two boards) comes across as primarily concerned with naming and blaming anyone indiscriminately who happens to be surprised by your valuable friendship. Your thread-starter did not come across as intent on offering a story of success to inspire and to teach others. At the risk of sounding a little moralistic, the latter would perhaps have been a trifle more constructive an approach. Having said that, I have no doubt of your good intentions. With kind regards, LilWabbit
"All things have I willed for you, and you too, for your own sake."
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Oct 28, 2011 - 6:36AM #10 | |
|
"Thats the prevailing stereotype but it is a racist stereotype, because not all Afrikaners are white supremacists. You may not like to admit it but you have had a racist moment there." I think you are confused about the meaning of the term "racist" - one can develop a stereotype - a generalization about a group based on a local, observed truth about an individual or small sample within a group, without it being racist (or even based on race). It is simply an expectation of a larger sample stemming from what has been experienced in the smaller sample. Seeing 1 Muslim as best friends with one Jew actually defies certain stereotypes and that's great. But it takes a statistical majority before that stereotype is no longer a valid a priori stance to assume. Stereotypes are short hand, not always negative. You are very quick to label things as "racist" but you are very wrong in that action. You have taken statistical tendency based in your own local experience of anyone who is surprised as harboring negative feelings and presumed it to be true of everyone else. Not everyone who is surprised is filled with hate. You may not like to admit it but you just expressed a personal bias for more than a moment there. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|