Aug 21, 2011 -- 10:19AM, Shubee wrote:

The news item is here: yourblackgospel.blogspot.com/2011/08/ga-...

Question: If Adventist pastors that commit the crime of child molestation are to be regarded as especially contemptible, then how should God-fearing Adventists feel about celebrated, Seventh-day Adventist, virtual sodomist apologists?    

Eugene,  Since "celebrated, Seventh-day Adventist, virtual sodomist apologists" is your latest article and in association with a recent accusation and arrest of a SDA pastor----Who are the apologists??  You are aware that like your claiming to be SDA that there are organized Gays who claim to be be SDA. The Official SDA Church doesn't sanction them. And the Arrest gives limited information.

Therefore, before you condemn the person or the SDA Church let's have more TRUE FACTS. In you article you used 1Tim5:19-20, "Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses. Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear."   And that instruction was From GOD(not just Paul) in the condemnation of any of sin.

I only see one accuser/witness. More information is needed, but Presently, as in the past, such actions are condemned by the SDA Church.----Sin isn't "covered-up" by anyone; for anyone.

It appears that you are rushing to condemn with your article. But what else is new.

Aug 21, 2011 -- 10:30PM, Shubee wrote:

Aug 21, 2011 -- 9:46PM, sincerly wrote:

Who are the apologists?? 

Some of them are on this forum. Shall I name names?

The celebrated, Seventh-day Adventist, virtual sodomist apologists are the Seventh-day Adventist equivalent of the Catholic apologists that turn aside justice, argue in defense of Catholic pedophile priests in the name of love and forgiveness and attack the victims that cry for justice, and accuse them of tarnishing the reputation of the holy order.

Ok,  this statement reveals the heart of the thread----Your: """and attack the victims that cry for justice, and accuse them of tarnishing the reputation of the holy order""".

Eugene, you were not "victimized by the Richardson Church", But your vindictiveness toward the Whole of the SDA Church organization is revealed in all of your articles.  Falsely manipulating EGW's writings in an attempt to vindicate your-self is Lying and now you are aware that is sin. The Decalogue is still valid you know.

Aug 22, 2011 -- 12:22AM, Shubee wrote:

Aug 21, 2011 -- 11:42PM, sincerly wrote:

Eugene, you were not "victimized by the Richardson Church", But your vindictiveness toward the Whole of the SDA Church organization is revealed in all of your articles.

That's precisely the same attitude taken by Catholic sodomist apologists.

 SO when are you ready to admit/repent of your erroneous ways???