| 2 years ago :: Jul 13, 2011 - 1:55AM #51 | |
I liked talking to him |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 13, 2011 - 3:23PM #52 | |
|
t: I agree ... The Term, "Super-Natural," is NOT helpful and should be avoided ... I disagree. I don't think arbitrarily changing the defintions of commonly used words simply because you personally don't like them does much to forward communication. And here is the first defintion of "supernatural" from Mirriam Webster: "of or relating to an order of existence beyond the visible observable universe; especially : of or relating to God or a god, demigod, spirit, or devi." Who are you, exactly, to demand that we scrap the most commonly used definition of the word? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 25, 2011 - 5:15PM #53 | |
Typical quote mining. A day later and a different thread and a totally different context to pick a fight and incidentally to derail a thread that cannot be deal with. Disgusting.
J'Carlin
If the shoe doesn't fit, don't cram your foot in it and complain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 27, 2011 - 2:27PM #54 | |
|
I would suggest that given a bit more time ursa might be equvalent. Yellow Yellow solved a bear cannister in seconds that defeated many humans with directions. If humans don't kill them off first. See Vital Signs by Dean Ing. Neanderthal was probably more intelligent and certainly a better apex predator than Homo. In their own way cetaceans may be as advanced as we are. Their lack of toolmaking capability is a prejudice of a weakling species that would be extinct without effective killing tools. Canis is another species that might compete with Homo at least in the smarts department. What to they have to do to repeat? Invent God?
J'Carlin
If the shoe doesn't fit, don't cram your foot in it and complain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 27, 2011 - 3:32PM #55 | |
“We are all without god – some of us just happen to be aware of it.” Monica Salcedo (Does anyone know who this is?)
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 28, 2011 - 1:42AM #56 | |
|
Actually you have it all wrong. "Futzilly" is EXPERIENCED as FUTZLY "Futz"
J'Carlin
If the shoe doesn't fit, don't cram your foot in it and complain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 28, 2011 - 11:02AM #57 | |
|
Does this mean that it is perfectly reasonable for John Nash to believe in the CIA agent once he encountered the CIA agent? And it was perfectly reasonable to try to analyze news articles for significant patterns that only Nash could find?
J'Carlin
If the shoe doesn't fit, don't cram your foot in it and complain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 30, 2011 - 9:29PM #58 | |
|
You can defend neither your knowledge of Christianity nor the Bible so you make a transparantly false allegation in an attempt to derail the thread. Then you go on with a pathetic simile that has nothing to do with anything.
J'Carlin
If the shoe doesn't fit, don't cram your foot in it and complain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Jul 31, 2011 - 2:12AM #59 | |
Oh I've defended it quit well. Enough to frustrate the most of you into resorting to clever editing and other cheap tactics to avoid my arguments.
"Sometimes you gotta step into the ring and throw a few punches for what you believe in."
--Ernest Hemingway-- |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 2 years ago :: Sep 18, 2011 - 4:53AM #60 | |
J'Carlin
If the shoe doesn't fit, don't cram your foot in it and complain. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|