| 12 months ago :: Jun 12, 2012 - 8:21PM #5021 | |
|
"Indeed, homo sapiens sapiens is the only animal that uses sarcasm."
Have you never lived with a cat? |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 12, 2012 - 8:32PM #5022 | |
You may say a cat uses good grammar. Well, a cat does -- but you let a cat get excited once; you let a cat get to pulling fur with another cat on a shed, nights, and you'll hear grammar that will give you the lockjaw. Ignorant people think it's the noise which fighting cats make that is so aggravating, but it ain't so; it's the sickening grammar they use. - Mark Twain.
Dave - Just a Man in the Mountains.
I am a Humanist. I believe in a rational philosophy of life, informed by science, inspired by art, and motivated by a desire to do good for its own sake and not by an expectation of a reward or fear of punishment in an afterlife. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 12, 2012 - 9:44PM #5023 | |
|
Hypocrisy's said to be unique to humans. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 12, 2012 - 9:46PM #5024 | |
A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato.. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 12:46AM #5025 | |
No, we can determine the meaning of ancient words by studying the grammatical and historical context. Otherwise, we would know nothing of history.
|
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 11:52AM #5026 | |
|
"Have you never lived with a cat?" Cats are ironic, not sarcastic. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 12:16PM #5027 | |
|
Christine: To them, using 'magic' meant to use the mind in conjunction with the physical world; in other words, understanding the Magian teachings of that time. Unfortunately, the way words are used changes over hundreds of years so they have no resemblance to the original meaning. You are overlaying your own interpretation. Cid: No, we can determine the meaning of ancient words by studying the grammatical and historical context. Otherwise, we would know nothing of history. >>>Cid, begging your pardon, there are excellent scholars researching the words now, that you don't even know about. Even so, the divinatory meaning of the words is not understood by the best researchers on the planet. Cid: Calming the sea, demonstrates His equality with God. >>>You're not getting it. That's one of the made up stories to sell the religion to the ignorant that still believed that gods intervened and controlled nature. You are still living in the past, worshipping the Pantheon of gods and goddesses. That's your mindset, the way you see it, the way you have been taught to see it. Cid: No, he plainly teaches that he is equal with God. He said that I and my father are one. He also said that he existed before Abraham. Also, John 11:27, he claims exclusive mutual knowledge between him and God, this plainly implies equality. Matt. 28:19 plainly implies His universal lordship when he says that the disciples should teach all nations His commandments. This type of authority is for God alone. >>>No. He doesn't plainly teach that. You're context is way off. "Existing before Abraham" was part of their reincarnation belief. "Father" meant the universe, all the ancestors, all that came before..........I'll give you an additional example of how interpretation was taken to the ridiculous in order to sell a religion. If I said I know how to play the violin, you could say that I am quite comfortable and at one with the violin, I have knowledge of the violin, and my students will go on to teach other students. But some idiots who were starting a new religion now called Christianity, wanted to attract those still worshipping gods and goddesses (i.e. Roman Pantheon) -- imaginary deities and idols. Those developing the mindset of this new religion were very clever operators. Invisible gods are complete and utter fantasy, and you've been sold a bill of goods and continue to believe in that fantasy. You've been hood-winked, took the bait, bamboozled and lied to. I've told you this at least 10 times. Cid: If we are one with the universe, then why does it bother even people that believe like you do, to walk in front of an eighteen wheeled giant truck moving 65 miles per hour? IOW the truck is part of you too, so why worry about it hitting you? >>>I already explained how it was blown out of proportion. If you want to believe in a fantasy, go right ahead; it won't improve your life. Cid: No, he was 1st century jew so he believed that God was separate from the universe, IOW he believed in the Creator and creation distinction. >>>I am quite sure you know nothing of what John the Baptist actually taught. I have read the literature, you haven't. He was down-played in the New Testament; the imaginary "Jesus" was built up. Cid: There is absolutely no grammatico-historical evidence for this interpretation. >>>Again, an assumption. You haven't read the literature. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 13, 2012 - 12:31PM #5028 | |
A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side. Aristotle
Never discourage anyone...who continually makes progress, no matter how slow. Plato.. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 14, 2012 - 9:24AM #5029 | |
Hypocrit...a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated feelings or beliefs. Loosely speaking, a dog can be said to be a hypocrit when she wags her tail when she is fearful. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|
| 12 months ago :: Jun 14, 2012 - 11:59AM #5030 | |
|
Dogs wag their tails when fearful as a sign of submission, that they are no threat. Not hypocritical. |
|
|
Quick Reply
|
|