<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Strong Support for Gay Marriage Now Exceeds Strong Opposition</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition</link><description>Strong Support for Gay Marriage Now Exceeds Strong Opposition"Overall, 53 percent of Americans say gay marriage should be legal, steady the past year but up from 36 percent in just 2006. Thirty-nine percent "strongly" support it, while 32 percent are</description><item><title>This thread was moved from the Hot Topics Zone.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=521145583#521145583</link><description>This thread was moved from the Hot Topics Zone.</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:12:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>A man and a man fall in love. A women and woman fall in love. Just as we think of a man and a woman falling in love. The man and women can legally marry. The man and man can not. women and woman can not, And they should be able to. Period. No variabl</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520877291#520877291</link><description>A man and a man fall in love. A women and woman fall in love. Just as we think of a man and a woman falling in love. The man and women can legally marry. The man and man can not. women and woman can not, And they should be able to. Period. No variabl</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:38:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Have you read any of these studies? How do you know they are based on the criteria you just made up? What you claim are "universal axioms" are not axioms at all, but your beliefs. Your dismissal of these studies is neither rational nor scientific.Suc</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520875741#520875741</link><description>Have you read any of these studies? How do you know they are based on the criteria you just made up? What you claim are "universal axioms" are not axioms at all, but your beliefs. Your dismissal of these studies is neither rational nor scientific.Suc</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:06:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think we do too for the most part. I have never seen you post that homosexuals should not have equal civil rights. As far as homosexual couples are given the same privileges and responsibilities as heterosexual couples I don't care what they call t</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520872777#520872777</link><description>I think we do too for the most part. I have never seen you post that homosexuals should not have equal civil rights. As far as homosexual couples are given the same privileges and responsibilities as heterosexual couples I don't care what they call t</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:12:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is pointless.And I'm bored with it. [/quote]Very telling response.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520870827#520870827</link><description>This is pointless.And I'm bored with it. [/quote]Very telling response.</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:06:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That's non-sensical, and completely irrelevant to the central point.[/quote]What is your "universal maxim" then, if what I said doesn't disprove it?Does your hand get tired from all that waving?Sorry, but the onus is on you, as the one making the pos</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520868745#520868745</link><description>That's non-sensical, and completely irrelevant to the central point.[/quote]What is your "universal maxim" then, if what I said doesn't disprove it?Does your hand get tired from all that waving?Sorry, but the onus is on you, as the one making the pos</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:14:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That's non-sensical, and completely irrelevant to the central point.[/quote]What is your "universal maxim" then, if what I said doesn't disprove it?Does your hand get tired from all that waving?Sorry, but the onus is on you, as the one making the pos</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520868297#520868297</link><description>That's non-sensical, and completely irrelevant to the central point.[/quote]What is your "universal maxim" then, if what I said doesn't disprove it?Does your hand get tired from all that waving?Sorry, but the onus is on you, as the one making the pos</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:04:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And when you provide some objective evidence that this is true we will consider it.Except that you have not presented it as fact. You have only presented your subjective opinion that these things are better. When you were presented with scientific st</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520866973#520866973</link><description>And when you provide some objective evidence that this is true we will consider it.Except that you have not presented it as fact. You have only presented your subjective opinion that these things are better. When you were presented with scientific st</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:37:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And when you provide some objective evidence that this is true we will consider it.Except that you have not presented it as fact. You have only presented your subjective opinion that these things are better. When you were presented with scientific st</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520866593#520866593</link><description>And when you provide some objective evidence that this is true we will consider it.Except that you have not presented it as fact. You have only presented your subjective opinion that these things are better. When you were presented with scientific st</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:30:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And when you provide some objective evidence that this is true we will consider it.Except that you have not presented it as fact. You have only presented your subjective opinion that these things are better. When you were presented with scientific st</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/29134299/Strong_Support_for_Gay_Marriage_Now_Exceeds_Strong_Opposition?post_id=520866315#520866315</link><description>And when you provide some objective evidence that this is true we will consider it.Except that you have not presented it as fact. You have only presented your subjective opinion that these things are better. When you were presented with scientific st</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:24:52 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
