<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Interesting flip-side....</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....</link><description>I'm wondering why didn't some of the far-leftie guys in our church follow what this church did...news.yahoo.com/gay-led-los-angeles-paris...</description><item><title>Dutch and Rob:I am merely recalling the response of TEC members, both lay and clergy, to the attitudes and actions of the General Conferences held every three years between 1973 and 1982 in which I was deeply involved with TEC in that decade. They we</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519967167#519967167</link><description>Dutch and Rob:I am merely recalling the response of TEC members, both lay and clergy, to the attitudes and actions of the General Conferences held every three years between 1973 and 1982 in which I was deeply involved with TEC in that decade. They we</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:38:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>So very true. But those who speak, publicly, in variance to the "stated word" are quickly silenced. Consider Hans Kueng (sp) as a prime example.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519965867#519965867</link><description>So very true. But those who speak, publicly, in variance to the "stated word" are quickly silenced. Consider Hans Kueng (sp) as a prime example.</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:27:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>One wonders though, just how united those up front in the RC church are united...what is said publically and what one holds as beliefs privately can be 2 very different things, especially when the private never becomes public for fear...</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519963257#519963257</link><description>One wonders though, just how united those up front in the RC church are united...what is said publically and what one holds as beliefs privately can be 2 very different things, especially when the private never becomes public for fear...</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:42:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Roo,I think it depends on how you define "The Church" If you're defining it as the people in the pews, then yes, TEC is all over the map on most issues, and our hierarchy reflect that diversity. OTOH, if you define The Church as that small handful of</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519958373#519958373</link><description>Roo,I think it depends on how you define "The Church" If you're defining it as the people in the pews, then yes, TEC is all over the map on most issues, and our hierarchy reflect that diversity. OTOH, if you define The Church as that small handful of</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:19:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>TECies tend to be a bit more circumspect about their positions &amp; pronouncements.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519953475#519953475</link><description>TECies tend to be a bit more circumspect about their positions &amp; pronouncements.</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:58:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Grobit;Even back during my time with TEC, the Church had taken on the reputation of "deciding to not make up it's mind" on certain crucial issues. What we see here now is a church distinctive in having no distinctives. Catholic Christianity has certa</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519951653#519951653</link><description>Grobit;Even back during my time with TEC, the Church had taken on the reputation of "deciding to not make up it's mind" on certain crucial issues. What we see here now is a church distinctive in having no distinctives. Catholic Christianity has certa</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:14:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Nah, I'm just sick of people using the three-legged stool as an excuse to come up with anything system they please when there is already one set up. If someone wants to do that, they are welcome to start their own denomination. [/quote]That's why TEC</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519933595#519933595</link><description>Nah, I'm just sick of people using the three-legged stool as an excuse to come up with anything system they please when there is already one set up. If someone wants to do that, they are welcome to start their own denomination. [/quote]That's why TEC</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:15:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Nah, I'm just sick of people using the three-legged stool as an excuse to come up with anything system they please when there is already one set up. If someone wants to do that, they are welcome to start their own denomination. [/quote]That's why TEC</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519932525#519932525</link><description>Nah, I'm just sick of people using the three-legged stool as an excuse to come up with anything system they please when there is already one set up. If someone wants to do that, they are welcome to start their own denomination. [/quote]That's why TEC</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:18:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>How very "Roman" sounding.[/quote]Nah, I'm just sick of people using the three-legged stool as an excuse to come up with anything system they please when there is already one set up. If someone wants to do that, they are welcome to start their own de</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519931537#519931537</link><description>How very "Roman" sounding.[/quote]Nah, I'm just sick of people using the three-legged stool as an excuse to come up with anything system they please when there is already one set up. If someone wants to do that, they are welcome to start their own de</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:21:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>How very "Roman" sounding.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29117825/Interesting_flip-side....?post_id=519910791#519910791</link><description>How very "Roman" sounding.</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 08:02:12 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
