New Posts For Thread: Republican Presidential Candidate "None of the Above"http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_AboveQuiz to show which of the Republican Candidates represents your political views:www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-20...Presidents tend to become fashon setters. If (God forbid) Mitt becomes President, will this "magical Mormon underwear" become de rigueur ?dekerivers.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/m...I'll bet those itch and are dreadfully uncomfortable in summer. I'vehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=518111933#518111933Presidents tend to become fashon setters. If (God forbid) Mitt becomes President, will this "magical Mormon underwear" become de rigueur ?dekerivers.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/m...I'll bet those itch and are dreadfully uncomfortable in summer. I'veFri, 30 Mar 2012 22:26:20 -0500Which is to say, in very clear terms, that neither party really stands for anything in particular. And they both get their campaign funds from the same pockets. That's what "annoys" me the most.[/quote]Because of corporate influences, it is temptinghttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517924501#517924501Which is to say, in very clear terms, that neither party really stands for anything in particular. And they both get their campaign funds from the same pockets. That's what "annoys" me the most.[/quote]Because of corporate influences, it is temptingSun, 25 Mar 2012 16:37:27 -0500Which is to say, in very clear terms, that neither party really stands for anything in particular. And they both get their campaign funds from the same pockets. That's what "annoys" me the most.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517783335#517783335Which is to say, in very clear terms, that neither party really stands for anything in particular. And they both get their campaign funds from the same pockets. That's what "annoys" me the most.Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:11:49 -0500The Republican Party of Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford and Rockefeller is dead, I think. My personal belief is that it was a unique product of American postwar liberalism (in the Sorenson sense... and which I think was a force for good in the world). I do hhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517783181#517783181The Republican Party of Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford and Rockefeller is dead, I think. My personal belief is that it was a unique product of American postwar liberalism (in the Sorenson sense... and which I think was a force for good in the world). I do hWed, 21 Mar 2012 17:08:33 -0500*chuckles* In other words, the Republican party is likely to emerge from this whole affair with fatal divisions between its conservative evangelical wing (Rick Santorum) and its (relatively) moderate wing (Mitt Romney). And they so asked for it, tohttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517783027#517783027*chuckles* In other words, the Republican party is likely to emerge from this whole affair with fatal divisions between its conservative evangelical wing (Rick Santorum) and its (relatively) moderate wing (Mitt Romney). And they so asked for it, toWed, 21 Mar 2012 17:04:51 -0500In case anyone is wondering why this thread is still going, it's because, early on in the discussion, it was dealing with, in part, religious issues, which are big with Republicans.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517782625#517782625In case anyone is wondering why this thread is still going, it's because, early on in the discussion, it was dealing with, in part, religious issues, which are big with Republicans.Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:56:11 -0500This is the UNITED States of America. I don't want a hodge podge mess of each state deciding whether civil rights, health care, and education are important. You'll probably hate this article, too, but here's a report card on how well individual statehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517782203#517782203This is the UNITED States of America. I don't want a hodge podge mess of each state deciding whether civil rights, health care, and education are important. You'll probably hate this article, too, but here's a report card on how well individual stateWed, 21 Mar 2012 16:47:17 -0500I know, it does concern me a little and sometimes I do feel that perhaps his age does affect his ability to be the best spokesman for his cause, and my general view, and my general view is that while he won't be the Presidential nominee, presidentialhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517781651#517781651I know, it does concern me a little and sometimes I do feel that perhaps his age does affect his ability to be the best spokesman for his cause, and my general view, and my general view is that while he won't be the Presidential nominee, presidentialWed, 21 Mar 2012 16:32:52 -0500Alexander, total agreement on this and succeeding posts. My only concern with Ron Paul is his age. I'll be voting for Gary Johnson, who is much younger and would have the stamina necessary for the job.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517781319#517781319Alexander, total agreement on this and succeeding posts. My only concern with Ron Paul is his age. I'll be voting for Gary Johnson, who is much younger and would have the stamina necessary for the job.Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:24:15 -0500Ron Paul discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation and would not provide equal rights and protections to glbt citizens.Right, he discriminates in that he voted against a constitional ban on gay marriage, he says gay people should be totally frhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/29000337/Republican_Presidential_Candidate_None_of_the_Above?post_id=517780749#517780749Ron Paul discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation and would not provide equal rights and protections to glbt citizens.Right, he discriminates in that he voted against a constitional ban on gay marriage, he says gay people should be totally frWed, 21 Mar 2012 16:11:52 -0500