<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Faith of US Presidents</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents</link><description>Here's a slide showing the declared (or assumed) Faith of the US Presidents:Faith of US PresidentsDo any surprise you?  I am surprised by Nixon's Quakers roots.   Also, I heard little of Eisenhower's JW roots.</description><item><title>Except he forgot about it while orchestrating "the Southern Strategy"  - moving the Dixiecrats into the Republican fold by pushing State Rights -"code for pro-segregation".</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516660775#516660775</link><description>Except he forgot about it while orchestrating "the Southern Strategy"  - moving the Dixiecrats into the Republican fold by pushing State Rights -"code for pro-segregation".</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:47:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>No doubt he had a degree of paranoia, and a massive chip on his shoulder, but there also was a degree to which his political opponents in the Democratic Party and Rockefeller Republicans made Nixon's personal characteristics the issue; his background</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516648253#516648253</link><description>No doubt he had a degree of paranoia, and a massive chip on his shoulder, but there also was a degree to which his political opponents in the Democratic Party and Rockefeller Republicans made Nixon's personal characteristics the issue; his background</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:19:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Damn!Too many TECies on the Supreme Court.Now I know what is wrong with it![/quote]Only one TECie on the SC is sufficient.  After all, Anglicanism is like Hollandaise Sauce.A little bit goes a long way.  [/quote]One bad apple spoils the whole barrel.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516623125#516623125</link><description>Damn!Too many TECies on the Supreme Court.Now I know what is wrong with it![/quote]Only one TECie on the SC is sufficient.  After all, Anglicanism is like Hollandaise Sauce.A little bit goes a long way.  [/quote]One bad apple spoils the whole barrel.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:07:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Really? I think Nixon is easily the most interesting and complex US president of the 20th century; his parent's (and particularly mother's) deeply held Quaker beliefs had a profound impact on Nixon's character. From 1952 to 1972, '64 was the only yea</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516619565#516619565</link><description>Really? I think Nixon is easily the most interesting and complex US president of the 20th century; his parent's (and particularly mother's) deeply held Quaker beliefs had a profound impact on Nixon's character. From 1952 to 1972, '64 was the only yea</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:59:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Damn!Too many TECies on the Supreme Court.Now I know what is wrong with it![/quote]Only one TECie on the SC is sufficient.  After all, Anglicanism is like Hollandaise Sauce.A little bit goes a long way.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516607245#516607245</link><description>Damn!Too many TECies on the Supreme Court.Now I know what is wrong with it![/quote]Only one TECie on the SC is sufficient.  After all, Anglicanism is like Hollandaise Sauce.A little bit goes a long way.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:37:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Damn!Too many TECies on the Supreme Court.Now I know what is wrong with it!</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516600305#516600305</link><description>Damn!Too many TECies on the Supreme Court.Now I know what is wrong with it!</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:39:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Related to topic:www.adherents.com/gov/adh_vp.htmlwww.adherents.com/adh_sc.html</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516596695#516596695</link><description>Related to topic:www.adherents.com/gov/adh_vp.htmlwww.adherents.com/adh_sc.html</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:00:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Here's a slide showing the declared (or assumed) Faith of the US Presidents:Faith of US PresidentsDo any surprise you?  I am surprised by Nixon's Quakers roots.   Also, I heard little of Eisenhower's JW roots.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/28934591/Faith_of_US_Presidents?post_id=516593877#516593877</link><description>Here's a slide showing the declared (or assumed) Faith of the US Presidents:Faith of US PresidentsDo any surprise you?  I am surprised by Nixon's Quakers roots.   Also, I heard little of Eisenhower's JW roots.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:43:00 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
