<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Psychology in the Church??</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church</link><description>Psychology  has made it way into the Whole Church, while it has proved to be helpful, there are some concerns that need to be brought to the table. My contact with Psychology has a lot to do with Dr. James Dobson and Focus on the Family which libs lo</description><item><title>Psychological observation and speculation is one thing, but interpretation is another.  Then there's application.With feminists and gay activists, I find it interesting the opposite interpretations and applications of psychology.  Whatever difference</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=493449321#493449321</link><description>Psychological observation and speculation is one thing, but interpretation is another.  Then there's application.With feminists and gay activists, I find it interesting the opposite interpretations and applications of psychology.  Whatever difference</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:21:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"It has been scientifically proven that there is a "gay" gene......"Uhh...actually, it has not.  Homosexuality, like personality, is probably about 50% attributable to genetics and 50% to environment. But no "gay gene" has actually been scientificall</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=378662881#378662881</link><description>"It has been scientifically proven that there is a "gay" gene......"Uhh...actually, it has not.  Homosexuality, like personality, is probably about 50% attributable to genetics and 50% to environment. But no "gay gene" has actually been scientificall</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:47:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In the original post the statement on Culpability was meant mainly as applying to the legal system. Psychology has become somewhat a secular religion in American society and has influenced the way we deal with criminal and immoral behavior. Such acti</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=316935888#316935888</link><description>In the original post the statement on Culpability was meant mainly as applying to the legal system. Psychology has become somewhat a secular religion in American society and has influenced the way we deal with criminal and immoral behavior. Such acti</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:28:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>When Dr Dobson was getting his degree back in the bad ol' days, homosexuality was considered a mental illness. I wonder if that weighs in on Dr. Dobson's outlook. It has only been in the last twenty or thirty years that this life style was taken off</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=316885378#316885378</link><description>When Dr Dobson was getting his degree back in the bad ol' days, homosexuality was considered a mental illness. I wonder if that weighs in on Dr. Dobson's outlook. It has only been in the last twenty or thirty years that this life style was taken off</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:03:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Slu,I can understand that you would object to the deliberate exposure by dads. A chat would most probabably do the trick. Am I getting signals that you are also objecting to "prevention" as well? There are many, myself included, who believe that this</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=314459903#314459903</link><description>Slu,I can understand that you would object to the deliberate exposure by dads. A chat would most probabably do the trick. Am I getting signals that you are also objecting to "prevention" as well? There are many, myself included, who believe that this</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:05:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You are missing the point entirely.Of course, as boys swim, go the gym, change clothes, etc., they're going to see other peoples' business.  That's the way life goes.  That's perfectly normal.What Mr. Dobson promotes is a father deliberately (not inc</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=314425103#314425103</link><description>You are missing the point entirely.Of course, as boys swim, go the gym, change clothes, etc., they're going to see other peoples' business.  That's the way life goes.  That's perfectly normal.What Mr. Dobson promotes is a father deliberately (not inc</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:58:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Question:Should dad help with the care of small children( boys especially) as they are potty trained and they learn to bathe and other private matters. Having no kids myself, I am kind of out the loop on this one. I did have nephews and nieces and I</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=314403843#314403843</link><description>Question:Should dad help with the care of small children( boys especially) as they are potty trained and they learn to bathe and other private matters. Having no kids myself, I am kind of out the loop on this one. I did have nephews and nieces and I</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:59:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>What was so immature about it?In any case, don't hold your breath.  I will probably make immature, uninformed, and sarcastic remarks with my last breathes.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=314389798#314389798</link><description>What was so immature about it?In any case, don't hold your breath.  I will probably make immature, uninformed, and sarcastic remarks with my last breathes.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:39:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No problem. I just don't see how anyone of any faith can defend Dobson's method much less admit they tried it out.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=314270637#314270637</link><description>No problem. I just don't see how anyone of any faith can defend Dobson's method much less admit they tried it out.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:34:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks for the respectful and concise answer. Perhaps a chat would do the trick, it's best when the kid brings it up.BTW I have an element of distrust of Psychology,especially when it's being used on kids. I had brought up Dobson as an example of Psy</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44071/18487963/Psychology_in_the_Church?post_id=314268743#314268743</link><description>Thanks for the respectful and concise answer. Perhaps a chat would do the trick, it's best when the kid brings it up.BTW I have an element of distrust of Psychology,especially when it's being used on kids. I had brought up Dobson as an example of Psy</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:27:05 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
