New Posts For Thread: Stumbling Down the Path of Happily Ever After. By Birkhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_BirkStumbling down the path of Happily ever after, requires a firm command of the concept that Love and only Love is the force of energy that guides as well contributes to the manifestation of all physical outcome. As a Divine Spirit, made manifest intoSerious or a lock of verbosity?[/quote]Serious or a lock of verbosity?[/quote]Serious or a lock of verbosity?There may well be people who think otherwise, Neomonist, but as I said, it's a popular meme that refuses to die. And I don't know of any braihttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519836313#519836313Serious or a lock of verbosity?[/quote]Serious or a lock of verbosity?[/quote]Serious or a lock of verbosity?There may well be people who think otherwise, Neomonist, but as I said, it's a popular meme that refuses to die. And I don't know of any braiSat, 19 May 2012 01:36:43 -0500Serious or a lock of verbosity?Serious or a lock of verbosity?Serious or a lock of verbosity?May 17, 2012 -- 3:47AM, Namchuck wrote:The old idea that half the brain is dedicated to reason while the other half is given over to intuition is no longer,http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519816631#519816631Serious or a lock of verbosity?Serious or a lock of verbosity?Serious or a lock of verbosity?May 17, 2012 -- 3:47AM, Namchuck wrote:The old idea that half the brain is dedicated to reason while the other half is given over to intuition is no longer,Fri, 18 May 2012 12:01:55 -0500Tell you what, you sift through the evidence and pick out what supports your point of view and I'll p.ick out the evidence that supports mine.Rational investigation and analysis has lead to wrong conclusions as well. [/quote]Oh, you're getting all sehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519766499#519766499Tell you what, you sift through the evidence and pick out what supports your point of view and I'll p.ick out the evidence that supports mine.Rational investigation and analysis has lead to wrong conclusions as well. [/quote]Oh, you're getting all seThu, 17 May 2012 01:47:30 -0500Tell you what, you sift through the evidence and pick out what supports your point of view and I'll p.ick out the evidence that supports mine.Rational investigation and analysis has lead to wrong conclusions as well.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519740517#519740517Tell you what, you sift through the evidence and pick out what supports your point of view and I'll p.ick out the evidence that supports mine.Rational investigation and analysis has lead to wrong conclusions as well.Wed, 16 May 2012 09:13:53 -0500You wrote, Neomonist, that:"The brain has a hemisphere that works in a rationa; mode and it has a hemisphere that works in an intuitive mose. If you cling to one or the other, you are only using half your brain."(sic)I think you'd be hard pressed tohttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519731629#519731629You wrote, Neomonist, that:"The brain has a hemisphere that works in a rationa; mode and it has a hemisphere that works in an intuitive mose. If you cling to one or the other, you are only using half your brain."(sic)I think you'd be hard pressed toWed, 16 May 2012 02:07:47 -0500williejhonlo:"LOL, so if someone were to disagree with you, would that mean that they are not perceiving correctly?"No, not at all. Evidence is the objective arbiter in any sort of reasonable discussion, wouldn't you agree?I'm willing to concede thehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519731515#519731515williejhonlo:"LOL, so if someone were to disagree with you, would that mean that they are not perceiving correctly?"No, not at all. Evidence is the objective arbiter in any sort of reasonable discussion, wouldn't you agree?I'm willing to concede theWed, 16 May 2012 01:58:53 -0500[/quote]LOL, so if someone were to disagree with you, would that mean that they are not perceiving correctly?[/quote]The brain has a hemisphere that works in a rationa; mode and it has a hemisphere that works in an intuitive mose. If you cling to onehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519716027#519716027[/quote]LOL, so if someone were to disagree with you, would that mean that they are not perceiving correctly?[/quote]The brain has a hemisphere that works in a rationa; mode and it has a hemisphere that works in an intuitive mose. If you cling to oneTue, 15 May 2012 14:26:43 -0500[/quote]LOL, so if someone were to disagree with you, would that mean that they are not perceiving correctly?http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519710905#519710905[/quote]LOL, so if someone were to disagree with you, would that mean that they are not perceiving correctly?Tue, 15 May 2012 12:10:27 -0500http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519696599#519696599Tue, 15 May 2012 01:44:04 -0500All the evidence you need is within you Dear Brother. I am not here to change anyones belief, in limitation, or to prove anything, to those without eyes to see, or the ears to hear the truth as it tranlates from the perception of the contiuous presehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44021/29113107/Stumbling_Down_the_Path_of_Happily_Ever_After._By_Birk?post_id=519664531#519664531All the evidence you need is within you Dear Brother. I am not here to change anyones belief, in limitation, or to prove anything, to those without eyes to see, or the ears to hear the truth as it tranlates from the perception of the contiuous preseMon, 14 May 2012 05:11:04 -0500