<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Creation and Bible in the School.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.</link><description>Creation by God should be taught as a option to secular origin of life.In addtion The Bible in western history and us history should be taught.I see no establishment of religion stating the above.Allow the schools the freedom, no fed thought police n</description><item><title>If Creation and the Bible should be taught in public schools then Creation and then Quran should be taught in schools.  If Creation and the Bible should be taught in public schools then Origin of the Species should be taught in chuches.    It is on F</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=522082457#522082457</link><description>If Creation and the Bible should be taught in public schools then Creation and then Quran should be taught in schools.  If Creation and the Bible should be taught in public schools then Origin of the Species should be taught in chuches.    It is on F</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:14:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just wanted to give my compliments to this quote, as someone with panentheist leanings... what a lovely way of phrasing it!</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=503420993#503420993</link><description>Just wanted to give my compliments to this quote, as someone with panentheist leanings... what a lovely way of phrasing it!</description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:52:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>design flaws; but no design?[/quote] Nobody claimed design.It is only those who cannot bear the thought of adaptive evolution without a god directing it who insist upon a designer.Evolution,btw,does not disprove God.Only the evangelical view of creat</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=503404477#503404477</link><description>design flaws; but no design?[/quote] Nobody claimed design.It is only those who cannot bear the thought of adaptive evolution without a god directing it who insist upon a designer.Evolution,btw,does not disprove God.Only the evangelical view of creat</description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:47:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>not really, there is a physicist in Israel who says from inside the big bang the process would appear to take about a week; while from without it take billions of years[/quote] It isn't about ones perspective.The Bible,as used by fundies trying to re</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=503403865#503403865</link><description>not really, there is a physicist in Israel who says from inside the big bang the process would appear to take about a week; while from without it take billions of years[/quote] It isn't about ones perspective.The Bible,as used by fundies trying to re</description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:40:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>not really, there is a physicist in Israel who says from inside the big bang the process would appear to take about a week; while from without it take billions of years[/quote]o_O  Yeah... I've heard a lot of hand waving in trying to preserve the "si</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=503165993#503165993</link><description>not really, there is a physicist in Israel who says from inside the big bang the process would appear to take about a week; while from without it take billions of years[/quote]o_O  Yeah... I've heard a lot of hand waving in trying to preserve the "si</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:53:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No. Just flaws. (Some folk DO have 'em, ya know.)</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=503010241#503010241</link><description>No. Just flaws. (Some folk DO have 'em, ya know.)</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:08:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>design flaws; but no design?</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=503005217#503005217</link><description>design flaws; but no design?</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:26:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>not really, there is a physicist in Israel who says from inside the big bang the process would appear to take about a week; while from without it take billions of years</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=503000969#503000969</link><description>not really, there is a physicist in Israel who says from inside the big bang the process would appear to take about a week; while from without it take billions of years</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:43:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The "biblical version" has been decisively ruled out these past two hundred years and more.  The evidence against it is overwhelming.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=502975437#502975437</link><description>The "biblical version" has been decisively ruled out these past two hundred years and more.  The evidence against it is overwhelming.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:21:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Biblical version is the easiest to rule out,if people are intelligent enough to understand the science.The fact that the universe is something like 13 billion years old,with the Earth being about 4 billion years old,destroys the biblical account.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27712325/Creation_and_Bible_in_the_School.?post_id=502957625#502957625</link><description>The Biblical version is the easiest to rule out,if people are intelligent enough to understand the science.The fact that the universe is something like 13 billion years old,with the Earth being about 4 billion years old,destroys the biblical account.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:31:47 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
