<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What's Next In The Battle Over DOMA</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA</link><description>tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/...I think DOMA will be found unconstitutional and many Christians will have a snot fit. It will be Loving v. Virginia all over again and the DOMA camp will lose.</description><item><title>No, the issue won't (or at least SHOULDN'T) "become: who gets to decide what is sacred?"People already get to 'decide' that for themselves. Obviously, the opponents of same-gender marriage already believe they're a 'blasphemy' of some sort. Meanwhile</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=488318225#488318225</link><description>No, the issue won't (or at least SHOULDN'T) "become: who gets to decide what is sacred?"People already get to 'decide' that for themselves. Obviously, the opponents of same-gender marriage already believe they're a 'blasphemy' of some sort. Meanwhile</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 08:32:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Indeed.  Those in favor of same sex marriage could claim their union is sacred, thus DOMA unconstitutional.  I suppose the issue woud become: who gets to decide what is sacred?  Since law is secular the definition of sacred would have to be left to i</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=488118069#488118069</link><description>Indeed.  Those in favor of same sex marriage could claim their union is sacred, thus DOMA unconstitutional.  I suppose the issue woud become: who gets to decide what is sacred?  Since law is secular the definition of sacred would have to be left to i</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:45:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>we need a thread on this subject here one jexample: defender's of DOMA claim they upholding marriage as a sacred institution of religionbut Congress shall make NO LAW respecting the establishment of religion or the free exercise thereof IF marriage i</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=487726305#487726305</link><description>we need a thread on this subject here one jexample: defender's of DOMA claim they upholding marriage as a sacred institution of religionbut Congress shall make NO LAW respecting the establishment of religion or the free exercise thereof IF marriage i</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:58:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Read the thread below this. Davelaw, one of the hosts, is saying that Bnet is thinking about removing inactive forums. As I said in that thread there are many topics we can discuss that would properly belong here. I guess since this was the first for</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=487726273#487726273</link><description>Read the thread below this. Davelaw, one of the hosts, is saying that Bnet is thinking about removing inactive forums. As I said in that thread there are many topics we can discuss that would properly belong here. I guess since this was the first for</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:58:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>See Homosexuality and Faith &gt; Christianity and Homosexuality &gt; Is The Bible Silent on Gay Marriage? for your answer.dblad</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=487720917#487720917</link><description>See Homosexuality and Faith &gt; Christianity and Homosexuality &gt; Is The Bible Silent on Gay Marriage? for your answer.dblad</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:12:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I can only hope you are right.I would sincerely like to see Scalia follow his prescient words re Lawrence v. Texas. Not gonna happen, I know.I would also like to see Thomas recuse himself (also not gonna happen), but we should be vigilant in remindin</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=487658093#487658093</link><description>I can only hope you are right.I would sincerely like to see Scalia follow his prescient words re Lawrence v. Texas. Not gonna happen, I know.I would also like to see Thomas recuse himself (also not gonna happen), but we should be vigilant in remindin</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:38:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/...I think DOMA will be found unconstitutional and many Christians will have a snot fit. It will be Loving v. Virginia all over again and the DOMA camp will lose.[/quote]I see DOMA ruled unconstitutional in a 5</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=487647349#487647349</link><description>tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/...I think DOMA will be found unconstitutional and many Christians will have a snot fit. It will be Loving v. Virginia all over again and the DOMA camp will lose.[/quote]I see DOMA ruled unconstitutional in a 5</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:04:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/...I think DOMA will be found unconstitutional and many Christians will have a snot fit. It will be Loving v. Virginia all over again and the DOMA camp will lose.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44011/27112473/Whats_Next_In_The_Battle_Over_DOMA?post_id=487632333#487632333</link><description>tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/...I think DOMA will be found unconstitutional and many Christians will have a snot fit. It will be Loving v. Virginia all over again and the DOMA camp will lose.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:17:01 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
