New Posts For Thread: My SCIENTIFIC understanding of WHAT God is.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.[QUOTE=johndavid23;1085521]BL, Aren't those progressive contractions known as black holes? At least in one observable instance of them. Your logic also negates the big bang. Gravity would only turn repulsive when matter is concentrated in what wehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274354231#274354231[QUOTE=johndavid23;1085521]BL, Aren't those progressive contractions known as black holes? At least in one observable instance of them. Your logic also negates the big bang. Gravity would only turn repulsive when matter is concentrated in what weTue, 17 Feb 2009 11:49:15 -0600BL, Aren't those progressive contractions known as black holes? At least in one observable instance of them. Your logic also negates the big bang. Gravity would only turn repulsive when matter is concentrated in what we call a "singularity"http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274353921#274353921BL, Aren't those progressive contractions known as black holes? At least in one observable instance of them. Your logic also negates the big bang. Gravity would only turn repulsive when matter is concentrated in what we call a "singularity"Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:31:12 -0600[QUOTE=johndavid23;1084994]Your adherence to "big bang" theory is purely hypothetical: I prefer quantum gravity theory. Thus, the universe keeps recycling itself. When gravity has attracted matter to that degree approaching "an initial event", ithttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274352911#274352911[QUOTE=johndavid23;1084994]Your adherence to "big bang" theory is purely hypothetical: I prefer quantum gravity theory. Thus, the universe keeps recycling itself. When gravity has attracted matter to that degree approaching "an initial event", itTue, 17 Feb 2009 10:21:06 -0600[QUOTE=BaiginLong;1083928] Predictive reverse engineering of events will thus reveal (through earlier observations of quantum events) that preceding generations of events will demonstrate calculable reduction in the amount of events. Regression equahttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274348991#274348991[QUOTE=BaiginLong;1083928] Predictive reverse engineering of events will thus reveal (through earlier observations of quantum events) that preceding generations of events will demonstrate calculable reduction in the amount of events. Regression equaTue, 17 Feb 2009 06:52:59 -0600Also, the word "indefinitely" there means that the limits of such causation are not definite. It doesn't mean that its occurence is uncertain.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274340371#274340371Also, the word "indefinitely" there means that the limits of such causation are not definite. It doesn't mean that its occurence is uncertain.Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:55:16 -0600So? There was something there. No one has said there wasn't anything there.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274339121#274339121So? There was something there. No one has said there wasn't anything there.Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:34:10 -0600[QUOTE=gillyflower;1083943][i]we see that every single event leads to more than one single effect indefinitely[/I] So that answer is no, Wis, he can't. [I]stop looking at deity as a being and just as a force that fits the definition of powers requihttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274339071#274339071[QUOTE=gillyflower;1083943][i]we see that every single event leads to more than one single effect indefinitely[/I] So that answer is no, Wis, he can't. [I]stop looking at deity as a being and just as a force that fits the definition of powers requiMon, 16 Feb 2009 15:31:47 -0600Frog does have the means. He has a working computer, an internet connection and a Bnet account. Perhaps you had another word in mind? [i]we see that every single event leads to more than one single effect indefinitely[/I] So that answer is no, Wishttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274338861#274338861Frog does have the means. He has a working computer, an internet connection and a Bnet account. Perhaps you had another word in mind? [i]we see that every single event leads to more than one single effect indefinitely[/I] So that answer is no, WisMon, 16 Feb 2009 15:20:27 -0600[QUOTE=wiscidea;1083729]Hello BL. I'd like to ask a simple and direct question, which I'm sure you've answered on numerous occasions elsewhere. But I'm here, not elsewhere. Furthermore, I'm simply curious; I'm not interested in cracking open the oldhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274338711#274338711[QUOTE=wiscidea;1083729]Hello BL. I'd like to ask a simple and direct question, which I'm sure you've answered on numerous occasions elsewhere. But I'm here, not elsewhere. Furthermore, I'm simply curious; I'm not interested in cracking open the oldMon, 16 Feb 2009 15:06:19 -0600Also, the word "indefinitely" there means that the limits of such causation are not definite. It doesn't mean that its occurence is uncertain.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/44001/13801231/My_SCIENTIFIC_understanding_of_WHAT_God_is.?post_id=274335441#274335441Also, the word "indefinitely" there means that the limits of such causation are not definite. It doesn't mean that its occurence is uncertain.Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:55:16 -0600