New Posts For Thread: What, in scientific terms, is a "kind"?http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kindWe need a scientific definition of the word "kind" that Creationists are so fond of using?Either give a proper scientific definition of the word or cease using it, thankyou.Rgurley:"No one refuted it..I WIN!"OK, now you are demonstrating a sense of humor.................http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518572863#518572863Rgurley:"No one refuted it..I WIN!"OK, now you are demonstrating a sense of humor.................Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:38:44 -0500Bullshit. Your 'God' is a Johnny-come-lately with the morals and sophistication of a spoiled four year old.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518568541#518568541Bullshit. Your 'God' is a Johnny-come-lately with the morals and sophistication of a spoiled four year old.Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:32:58 -0500What's to refute?You were blithering along about some sort of interpertation of your cultic writings, which have been repeatedly demonstrated to be higly suspect when it comes to any sort of real world accuracy, failing most of the tests of veracityhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518568415#518568415What's to refute?You were blithering along about some sort of interpertation of your cultic writings, which have been repeatedly demonstrated to be higly suspect when it comes to any sort of real world accuracy, failing most of the tests of veracityFri, 13 Apr 2012 10:29:39 -05001. You don`t seem to understand science very much at all.2. Lots of us are not 'unbelievers' ( a propaganda word if I ever heard one ). 3. If by `spiritually discern the miraculous words of the bible`you mean 'agree with you in every particular of yohttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518568129#5185681291. You don`t seem to understand science very much at all.2. Lots of us are not 'unbelievers' ( a propaganda word if I ever heard one ). 3. If by `spiritually discern the miraculous words of the bible`you mean 'agree with you in every particular of yoFri, 13 Apr 2012 10:21:20 -0500First of all, your discernment changes according to the latest biblical fads. It wouldn't be in line with the discernment of those from the first century AD.Second, unbelievers can certainly discern the words of the Bible. They are the same ideas thahttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518566859#518566859First of all, your discernment changes according to the latest biblical fads. It wouldn't be in line with the discernment of those from the first century AD.Second, unbelievers can certainly discern the words of the Bible. They are the same ideas thaFri, 13 Apr 2012 09:41:37 -0500Great. Then you should have no problem seeing that organisms can evolve out of their kinds into new ones over long periods of time.Maybe you're a closet evo.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518566731#518566731Great. Then you should have no problem seeing that organisms can evolve out of their kinds into new ones over long periods of time.Maybe you're a closet evo.Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:37:32 -0500As well as all of the Buddhists, Hindus, Confucianists, Daoists, Shinto, Pagans, Wicca, agnostics, etc..They don't have a workable scientific definition of "kinds" either ... and they probably think Biblical "kinds" is more idiotic than the "atheistshttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518565883#518565883As well as all of the Buddhists, Hindus, Confucianists, Daoists, Shinto, Pagans, Wicca, agnostics, etc..They don't have a workable scientific definition of "kinds" either ... and they probably think Biblical "kinds" is more idiotic than the "atheistsFri, 13 Apr 2012 09:13:29 -0500What makes you think all spiritual believers believe in the Bible?What makes you think that all people who do NOT believe in the Bible are "unbelievers"?Pretty damn arrogant of you.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518564895#518564895What makes you think all spiritual believers believe in the Bible?What makes you think that all people who do NOT believe in the Bible are "unbelievers"?Pretty damn arrogant of you.Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:43:26 -0500No one refuted your post because you didn't provide anything to refute.You were asked for a scientific definition of the word "kinds." You didn't provide one. All you did was list the times the word "kinds" was used in the Bible followed by some wordhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518564399#518564399No one refuted your post because you didn't provide anything to refute.You were asked for a scientific definition of the word "kinds." You didn't provide one. All you did was list the times the word "kinds" was used in the Bible followed by some wordFri, 13 Apr 2012 08:29:16 -0500Iam,So you are just going to ignore the fact that you blatantly lied about a large number of theists when you claimed that they accepted evolution only because they reject God? Not even an apology?Correct me, but isn't it Satan who is called the "Fahttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/29034101/What,_in_scientific_terms,_is_a_kind?post_id=518563745#518563745Iam,So you are just going to ignore the fact that you blatantly lied about a large number of theists when you claimed that they accepted evolution only because they reject God? Not even an apology?Correct me, but isn't it Satan who is called the "FaFri, 13 Apr 2012 08:10:36 -0500