<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Is information causal?</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal</link><description>In this analysis both aspects of information - its structure or syntax - and its more common usage as - meaningful data, which can be communicated as a message - need to be considered.  The first is formal information as governed by the math of the M</description><item><title>That is expressed, far better than I have.  I may be gibbering from time-to-time and surely I admit to speaking Geek (more than Greek).However, that doesn't stop me when I think I have my teeth in a difficult problem.There is a draft of a brand new p</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528824797#528824797</link><description>That is expressed, far better than I have.  I may be gibbering from time-to-time and surely I admit to speaking Geek (more than Greek).However, that doesn't stop me when I think I have my teeth in a difficult problem.There is a draft of a brand new p</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:04:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>ncgThey is no Truth in physics - only patterns that can be logically applied in computation. 'Truth' in physics refers to our best understanding for the time being as found in the consensus of relevant physicists. Thus eg our theory of gravity is in</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528823455#528823455</link><description>ncgThey is no Truth in physics - only patterns that can be logically applied in computation. 'Truth' in physics refers to our best understanding for the time being as found in the consensus of relevant physicists. Thus eg our theory of gravity is in</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:51:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I hope you have put to bed the idea that randomness, is any kind of problem in defining Propensity as a descriptor in the generation of caus[a]tive models.  Randomness can be seen as a lack of measured propensity in the data or a lack of selection of</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528820167#528820167</link><description>I hope you have put to bed the idea that randomness, is any kind of problem in defining Propensity as a descriptor in the generation of caus[a]tive models.  Randomness can be seen as a lack of measured propensity in the data or a lack of selection of</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:36:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Truth tables don't express premises, they are a spelled out process for computation with Boolean analysis.  I understand what you are saying and actually agree.  The propensities in physics are empirical from data and the Boolean nature of the comput</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528817721#528817721</link><description>Truth tables don't express premises, they are a spelled out process for computation with Boolean analysis.  I understand what you are saying and actually agree.  The propensities in physics are empirical from data and the Boolean nature of the comput</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:24:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Adelphe,141.14.165.6/CogSci09/papers/277/paper27...</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528815411#528815411</link><description>Adelphe,141.14.165.6/CogSci09/papers/277/paper27...</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:17:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>scgtruth tables can tell us about propensityTruth tables are no better than their premises.  The only way a premise can be true is by according accurately with reality.  The only way to tell whether it accords with reality is by looking at reality, n</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528765085#528765085</link><description>scgtruth tables can tell us about propensityTruth tables are no better than their premises.  The only way a premise can be true is by according accurately with reality.  The only way to tell whether it accords with reality is by looking at reality, n</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:41:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>OK   thanks.The idea is - one can have very similar versions of propensity - whether it is deterministic physical laws, where the cause is generated by the propensity of the science laws....................And when it is used at the different level o</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528758133#528758133</link><description>OK   thanks.The idea is - one can have very similar versions of propensity - whether it is deterministic physical laws, where the cause is generated by the propensity of the science laws....................And when it is used at the different level o</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:44:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I hope you have put to bed the idea that randomness, is any kind of problem in defining Propensity as a descriptor in the generation of caus[a]tive models.  Randomness can be seen as a lack of measured propensity in the data or a lack of selection of</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528757783#528757783</link><description>I hope you have put to bed the idea that randomness, is any kind of problem in defining Propensity as a descriptor in the generation of caus[a]tive models.  Randomness can be seen as a lack of measured propensity in the data or a lack of selection of</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:28:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>sdpThank you for your comment. It wasn't just my impression, then ...MdS</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528728229#528728229</link><description>sdpThank you for your comment. It wasn't just my impression, then ...MdS</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:45:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I hope you have put to bed the idea that randomness, is any kind of problem in defining Propensity as a descriptor in the generation of caus[a]tive models.  Randomness can be seen as a lack of measured propensity in the data or a lack of selection of</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43991/28472469/Is_information_causal?post_id=528719915#528719915</link><description>I hope you have put to bed the idea that randomness, is any kind of problem in defining Propensity as a descriptor in the generation of caus[a]tive models.  Randomness can be seen as a lack of measured propensity in the data or a lack of selection of</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 07:17:51 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
