<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Nebraska Bill Would Make Killing An Abortion Provider Justifiable Homicide</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide</link><description>When will the Christian Right learn that the Bible is not the supreme law of the land, the Constitution is. The Nebraska legislature is considering a bill by State Senator Mark Christensen that would consider killing to protect the life of a fetus ju</description><item><title>Is this law neccessary?  I doubt it.  I don't think any women would be arrested for protecting her unborn child. Is this a political stunt?  Probably.Would this law endanger the lives of Abortion Doctors?  No.  If find it amazing how people believe t</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=500910153#500910153</link><description>Is this law neccessary?  I doubt it.  I don't think any women would be arrested for protecting her unborn child. Is this a political stunt?  Probably.Would this law endanger the lives of Abortion Doctors?  No.  If find it amazing how people believe t</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:04:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Silly me. I didn't source check before I posted. The first line of the text specifically addresses self defense and extending protection to unborn children.Everyone can relax; THE SKY IN NOT FALLING!</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=500906745#500906745</link><description>Silly me. I didn't source check before I posted. The first line of the text specifically addresses self defense and extending protection to unborn children.Everyone can relax; THE SKY IN NOT FALLING!</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:24:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The word abortion is not mentioned in the Bible That's probably because the Jews believed in life . By the way the word Trinity isn't  in the Bible  but the Christians I know believe in the trinity - that is father , Son , Holy Spirit . Relevant Scri</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=500894109#500894109</link><description>The word abortion is not mentioned in the Bible That's probably because the Jews believed in life . By the way the word Trinity isn't  in the Bible  but the Christians I know believe in the trinity - that is father , Son , Holy Spirit . Relevant Scri</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:41:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>When will the Christian Right learn that the Bible is not the supreme law of the land, the Constitution is. The Nebraska legislature is considering a bill by State Senator Mark Christensen that would consider killing to protect the life of a fetus ju</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=500886681#500886681</link><description>When will the Christian Right learn that the Bible is not the supreme law of the land, the Constitution is. The Nebraska legislature is considering a bill by State Senator Mark Christensen that would consider killing to protect the life of a fetus ju</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 03:56:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not dismissing your last statement, I simply do not agree with it based on the actual wording.[/quote]Of course it doesn't. They are not stupid enough to phrase the bill in a way that would outright criminalize abortion or make it legal to murder</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=487502081#487502081</link><description>I'm not dismissing your last statement, I simply do not agree with it based on the actual wording.[/quote]Of course it doesn't. They are not stupid enough to phrase the bill in a way that would outright criminalize abortion or make it legal to murder</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:54:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I know you need to believe I am dismissing something, but it seems you are dismissing the law as it is now. I know of no state that does not have a self defense law. If this woman killed the man in self defense there would have been no trial. If she</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=487500645#487500645</link><description>I know you need to believe I am dismissing something, but it seems you are dismissing the law as it is now. I know of no state that does not have a self defense law. If this woman killed the man in self defense there would have been no trial. If she</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:38:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In this case we have a religion DEMANDING that we MUST obey their rules as to what is right and what is not. Congress had nothing to do with Roe V Wade.No, they do not. If they do, then it might be better if they do have an abortion or give the child</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=487499265#487499265</link><description>In this case we have a religion DEMANDING that we MUST obey their rules as to what is right and what is not. Congress had nothing to do with Roe V Wade.No, they do not. If they do, then it might be better if they do have an abortion or give the child</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:24:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I know you need to believe I am dismissing something, but it seems you are dismissing the law as it is now. I know of no state that does not have a self defense law. If this woman killed the man in self defense there would have been no trial. If she</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=487498673#487498673</link><description>I know you need to believe I am dismissing something, but it seems you are dismissing the law as it is now. I know of no state that does not have a self defense law. If this woman killed the man in self defense there would have been no trial. If she</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:18:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So are you saying that a 12-year-old who was impregnated by her father should be forced to carry the fetus to term? Also, since when has it been illegal for dog owners to have their pet's puppies aborted?Besides the language of the bill would make it</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=487498445#487498445</link><description>So are you saying that a 12-year-old who was impregnated by her father should be forced to carry the fetus to term? Also, since when has it been illegal for dog owners to have their pet's puppies aborted?Besides the language of the bill would make it</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:15:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Since she is not in prison for that crime then there is no need for the law. This is just another back door attempt to criminalize elective abortion. Women already have the right to protect themselves and any fetus they may be carrying. Also note tha</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/27081213/Nebraska_Bill_Would_Make_Killing_An_Abortion_Provider_Justifiable_Homicide?post_id=487497253#487497253</link><description>Since she is not in prison for that crime then there is no need for the law. This is just another back door attempt to criminalize elective abortion. Women already have the right to protect themselves and any fetus they may be carrying. Also note tha</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:03:38 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
