<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: on " the PRO-LIFE HIPPOCRATES" or "ifen the shoe fits it must be worn !</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!</link><description>peace and good will to all EXCEPT those that act to require others sufferings by there use of "the religious faith card"-the american " health care debate" has been unfolding for just about a year now- at this time the house of reps can not move the</description><item><title>No. It's irrelevant if it doesn't address anything I wrote out and argues a totally different point. That's why. It's akin to talking about favorite colors and having one person chime in with a "I like chocolate milk!". I mean, it's great and all but</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409877257#409877257</link><description>No. It's irrelevant if it doesn't address anything I wrote out and argues a totally different point. That's why. It's akin to talking about favorite colors and having one person chime in with a "I like chocolate milk!". I mean, it's great and all but</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:33:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sure bei -- if it doesn't fit with your preconceived notions it's irrelevant. From your numerous threads on polls I realize that what you think is relevant is opinion, but only opinions that agree with yours. And when you're asked to back up your cla</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409857093#409857093</link><description>Sure bei -- if it doesn't fit with your preconceived notions it's irrelevant. From your numerous threads on polls I realize that what you think is relevant is opinion, but only opinions that agree with yours. And when you're asked to back up your cla</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:47:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1.) Don't care about the first link. That's not really relevant to anything. 2.) I was hit with a feeling of deja vu by the second link. Almost like it was 2009. Dunno' why though...</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409713205#409713205</link><description>1.) Don't care about the first link. That's not really relevant to anything. 2.) I was hit with a feeling of deja vu by the second link. Almost like it was 2009. Dunno' why though...</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:31:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>From 2007This is from 2000.Of course the second study I linked to in my previous post was from 2001.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409705885#409705885</link><description>From 2007This is from 2000.Of course the second study I linked to in my previous post was from 2001.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:14:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>29 years ago. That's older than I am</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409699029#409699029</link><description>29 years ago. That's older than I am</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:08:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You're welcome, mmichael. You might be interested in these articles:www.jstor.org/pss/2134696The effect of abortion restrictions on timing of abortionsThanks for those links! I couldn't access all of the second article, but I found a similar one on t</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409697297#409697297</link><description>You're welcome, mmichael. You might be interested in these articles:www.jstor.org/pss/2134696The effect of abortion restrictions on timing of abortionsThanks for those links! I couldn't access all of the second article, but I found a similar one on t</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:49:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You're welcome, mmichael. You might be interested in these articles:www.jstor.org/pss/2134696The effect of abortion restrictions on timing of abortions</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409656309#409656309</link><description>You're welcome, mmichael. You might be interested in these articles:www.jstor.org/pss/2134696The effect of abortion restrictions on timing of abortions</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:36:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You know why no pro-lifer would accept that compromise? Because 1 = 1 - 1 + 1.Of course you'd be happy with "safe, legal and early" because nothing would, in essence, change. Why does it matter when an abortion occurs? It's only pro-choicers who dist</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409595553#409595553</link><description>You know why no pro-lifer would accept that compromise? Because 1 = 1 - 1 + 1.Of course you'd be happy with "safe, legal and early" because nothing would, in essence, change. Why does it matter when an abortion occurs? It's only pro-choicers who dist</description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:27:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I am sorry for your sister/sister-in-law's miscarriage and also your sister's friend's miscarriage. But a fetus at 20 or 25 weeks does not look like one at 9 weeks or like an embryo at 7 weeks. Only about 1% of abortions in the US are done at 21 week</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409591321#409591321</link><description>I am sorry for your sister/sister-in-law's miscarriage and also your sister's friend's miscarriage. But a fetus at 20 or 25 weeks does not look like one at 9 weeks or like an embryo at 7 weeks. Only about 1% of abortions in the US are done at 21 week</description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:43:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Because abortion kills a human being?Irony? It has to be. It just has to....And it's funny how accepting people are of science-- When it suits them. Otherwise, they totally ignore and discard it *cough cough, hint hint, wink wink*</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/22598213/on__the_PRO-LIFE_HIPPOCRATES_or_ifen_the_shoe_fits_it_must_be_worn_!?post_id=409579785#409579785</link><description>Because abortion kills a human being?Irony? It has to be. It just has to....And it's funny how accepting people are of science-- When it suits them. Otherwise, they totally ignore and discard it *cough cough, hint hint, wink wink*</description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:33:44 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
