<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Majority of Americans now &acirc;&#x80;&#x98;pro-life,&acirc;&#x80;&#x99; poll says</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&acirc;&#x80;&#x98;pro-life,&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;_poll_says</link><description>For first time in 15 years of Gallup polling, &amp;lsquo;pro-choice&amp;rsquo; is overtakenFirst of all, this makes me extremely happy for the future. Now, with that being said, Nancy Keenan is an idiot. Very few people, relatively speaking, are single-issue</description><item><title>OK, I did make an error -- the study I was citing was on teen pregnancy and abortion rates. I do apologize for the confusion on my part there. Still is interesting to see that despite the restrictions MS has on abortion, it still ranks 28 in teen abo</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294969168#294969168</link><description>OK, I did make an error -- the study I was citing was on teen pregnancy and abortion rates. I do apologize for the confusion on my part there. Still is interesting to see that despite the restrictions MS has on abortion, it still ranks 28 in teen abo</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:28:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I never said abstinence only programs are effective. You said abstinence isn't effective,I did not say abstinence isn't effective. If you say I did, produce the post. I can't continue a discussion in which each time you post you say I am making claim</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294962918#294962918</link><description>I never said abstinence only programs are effective. You said abstinence isn't effective,I did not say abstinence isn't effective. If you say I did, produce the post. I can't continue a discussion in which each time you post you say I am making claim</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:35:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If that doesn't work, put the article title into google; I did and the first link to come back took me to the abstract. Here's the article's title: Complications after Second Trimester Surgical and Medical Abortion</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294961858#294961858</link><description>If that doesn't work, put the article title into google; I did and the first link to come back took me to the abstract. Here's the article's title: Complications after Second Trimester Surgical and Medical Abortion</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:25:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I never said that a man couldn't have views on pregnancy. However, while you are discussing the scientific angle, it is an event that is extremely physical for a woman, and to presume you have equal knowledge of the hormonal shifts that occur and how</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294957396#294957396</link><description>I never said that a man couldn't have views on pregnancy. However, while you are discussing the scientific angle, it is an event that is extremely physical for a woman, and to presume you have equal knowledge of the hormonal shifts that occur and how</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:34:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If that's the case, then about 99.89% of all academia is also a lie.No, most of them actually come up with short, simple, "elegant", explanations.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294919419#294919419</link><description>If that's the case, then about 99.89% of all academia is also a lie.No, most of them actually come up with short, simple, "elegant", explanations.</description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:00:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If by "here to impress other PL's and not enter into honest discussions" you mean "ignoring the evidence which doesn't suit PC'ers" then, yes, I'm here to impress other PL's and not enter into honest discussions :P</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294868693#294868693</link><description>If by "here to impress other PL's and not enter into honest discussions" you mean "ignoring the evidence which doesn't suit PC'ers" then, yes, I'm here to impress other PL's and not enter into honest discussions :P</description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:50:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>They're not "assumptions" and no, it doesn't. That's such a ridiculous argument, as it assumes that one needs to be a woman to speak of abortion or pregnancy. It's ridiculousness is shown when applied elsewhere (See one of my previous posts).You are</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294867073#294867073</link><description>They're not "assumptions" and no, it doesn't. That's such a ridiculous argument, as it assumes that one needs to be a woman to speak of abortion or pregnancy. It's ridiculousness is shown when applied elsewhere (See one of my previous posts).You are</description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:43:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Okay. Sorry for the delay. I've been busy and stuff =DI never said abstinence only programs are effective. You said abstinence isn't effective, I said that's not exactly true and posted a study on the effects of both sex ed and abstinence (Once again</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294864893#294864893</link><description>Okay. Sorry for the delay. I've been busy and stuff =DI never said abstinence only programs are effective. You said abstinence isn't effective, I said that's not exactly true and posted a study on the effects of both sex ed and abstinence (Once again</description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:32:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There is this old saying, and for the most part it's true; "the longer the explanation the bigger the lie."I haven't bothered reading several posters here for a long time. They're here to impress other PLs and not enter into honest discussions.</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294549383#294549383</link><description>There is this old saying, and for the most part it's true; "the longer the explanation the bigger the lie."I haven't bothered reading several posters here for a long time. They're here to impress other PLs and not enter into honest discussions.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:31:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Bei  Having gone through both a miscarriage and a live birth, I think that qualifies me more about the effects of a prenancy than your assumptions.You are correct that I should not have assumed you reserved your contempt for women; you seem to feel i</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43971/14584443/Majority_of_Americans_now_&#x2018;pro-life,&#x2019;_poll_says?post_id=294540496#294540496</link><description>Bei  Having gone through both a miscarriage and a live birth, I think that qualifies me more about the effects of a prenancy than your assumptions.You are correct that I should not have assumed you reserved your contempt for women; you seem to feel i</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:24:55 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
