New Posts For Thread: Yet ANOTHER Anti-Gay Activist Judge Makes a Fool of Himself Legallyhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_LegallyHouston judge limits rights of gay father"A Houston judge entered an order on June 24 which prohibits a father from leaving his children alone with any man they aren’t related to “by blood or adoption.” Because there was no allegatiActually, I wish he'd be removed from the bench. Someone this hateful, should be removed by force IMO, to make the statement that this type of judicial behavior will not be tolerated. Although, I don't think this is a likely outcome in TX.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505750399#505750399Actually, I wish he'd be removed from the bench. Someone this hateful, should be removed by force IMO, to make the statement that this type of judicial behavior will not be tolerated. Although, I don't think this is a likely outcome in TX.Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:51:55 -0500This is an excellent point, I hope this man's lawyers think of it.It means he can't hire a babysitter who is male, a nanny, a teacher, even a doctor, or nurse. he would not even be allow to let his child be in alone in the presence of a police officehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505749983#505749983This is an excellent point, I hope this man's lawyers think of it.It means he can't hire a babysitter who is male, a nanny, a teacher, even a doctor, or nurse. he would not even be allow to let his child be in alone in the presence of a police officeWed, 24 Aug 2011 17:41:57 -0500Excellent point Irenehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505739033#505739033Excellent point IreneWed, 24 Aug 2011 13:54:18 -0500By ‘blood or adoption’? So uncles related not by blood are out of bounds too?Sheesh!I find it telling that the ex-wife’s attorney supported this ruling. She claims this is common yet cannot cite a single case where such a ruling wahttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505738743#505738743By ‘blood or adoption’? So uncles related not by blood are out of bounds too?Sheesh!I find it telling that the ex-wife’s attorney supported this ruling. She claims this is common yet cannot cite a single case where such a ruling waWed, 24 Aug 2011 13:46:59 -0500This is an excellent point, I hope this man's lawyers think of it.It means he can't hire a babysitter who is male, a nanny, a teacher, even a doctor, or nurse. he would not even be allow to let his child be in alone in the presence of a police officehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505737609#505737609This is an excellent point, I hope this man's lawyers think of it.It means he can't hire a babysitter who is male, a nanny, a teacher, even a doctor, or nurse. he would not even be allow to let his child be in alone in the presence of a police officeWed, 24 Aug 2011 13:26:19 -0500This is an excellent point, I hope this man's lawyers think of it. It means he can't hire a babysitter who is male, a nanny, a teacher, even a doctor, or nurse. he would not even be allow to let his child be in alone in the presence of a police offichttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505736613#505736613This is an excellent point, I hope this man's lawyers think of it. It means he can't hire a babysitter who is male, a nanny, a teacher, even a doctor, or nurse. he would not even be allow to let his child be in alone in the presence of a police officWed, 24 Aug 2011 13:10:01 -0500Wait. I think my brain just blue screened. Does this mean they can't go to school? There are plenty of male teachers, and I would think that having two dozen other children wouldn't count. I would think the courts would still see that as leaving thhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505736217#505736217Wait. I think my brain just blue screened. Does this mean they can't go to school? There are plenty of male teachers, and I would think that having two dozen other children wouldn't count. I would think the courts would still see that as leaving thWed, 24 Aug 2011 13:03:40 -0500"want to live" there? Stuck living there, perhaps.That's an odd thing to do, considering your 'statistic' ("Texas leads the nation on gay headed families with children"). ALL of those myriad families have absolutely NO legal protections for those chihttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505721291#505721291"want to live" there? Stuck living there, perhaps.That's an odd thing to do, considering your 'statistic' ("Texas leads the nation on gay headed families with children"). ALL of those myriad families have absolutely NO legal protections for those chiWed, 24 Aug 2011 07:13:19 -0500Texas might be "backwards" but Texas leads the nation on gay headed families with children. So more gays with children want to live in Texas than any other state. I will defend Texas. Not the judge and I don't know what you have agaist Christianithttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505706259#505706259Texas might be "backwards" but Texas leads the nation on gay headed families with children. So more gays with children want to live in Texas than any other state. I will defend Texas. Not the judge and I don't know what you have agaist ChristianitTue, 23 Aug 2011 18:31:21 -0500Why, because of 'good Christian principles' that he seems to be upholding. Why, because Texas is a backward-lovin' State.Gosh, GC, there's SOOO MANY reasons. Ask your fellow "Christians".http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43931/28224149/Yet_ANOTHER_Anti-Gay_Activist_Judge_Makes_a_Fool_of_Himself_Legally?post_id=505699533#505699533Why, because of 'good Christian principles' that he seems to be upholding. Why, because Texas is a backward-lovin' State.Gosh, GC, there's SOOO MANY reasons. Ask your fellow "Christians".Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:13:47 -0500