New Posts For Thread: Matthew 28:19http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19Random people keep sending me emails about this verse. Since I no longer have to Watchtower Lib (new computer), I'm gonna need some assistance. Everyone is familiar with this common remark about being baptised in the name of the father and the son anNOT TRUE!!!http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=522677149#522677149NOT TRUE!!!Mon, 06 Aug 2012 06:21:50 -0500It is also possible that Matt 28 ghas ben altered by Trinitarians. html_removedhtml_removedhtml_removedhtml_removed Eusebius the church historian had in his library a copy of Matthew in Hebrew, which Jerome mentions as having seen. Eusebius until,http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=521987137#521987137It is also possible that Matt 28 ghas ben altered by Trinitarians. html_removedhtml_removedhtml_removedhtml_removed Eusebius the church historian had in his library a copy of Matthew in Hebrew, which Jerome mentions as having seen. Eusebius until,Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:38:00 -0500In response to "The Other Paul," to suggest that the baptismal formula in Matthew 28 has been altered by Trinitarians is absurd and without any evidence. There is one "name" that applies to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and if the Father' s name ishttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=520636371#520636371In response to "The Other Paul," to suggest that the baptismal formula in Matthew 28 has been altered by Trinitarians is absurd and without any evidence. There is one "name" that applies to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and if the Father' s name isSat, 09 Jun 2012 12:34:29 -0500I have no doubt that the scriptures were tamoered with to add more than "In Jesus name" for that was the apistasy told about by Paul, in 2 Thess. that was held back until all those having been given the sprit of truth died , for they wre holdinghttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=507202145#507202145I have no doubt that the scriptures were tamoered with to add more than "In Jesus name" for that was the apistasy told about by Paul, in 2 Thess. that was held back until all those having been given the sprit of truth died , for they wre holdingMon, 26 Sep 2011 00:55:29 -0500Just read the Book of Acts.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=497013989#497013989Just read the Book of Acts.Thu, 26 May 2011 03:22:40 -0500It's quite possible it may be as anotherpaul's has indicated by reference. According Nestle and Aland there are no known extant manuscripts prior to the 4th century for the last 2 books of Matthew. Tradition and zealous scribes may account for thehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=276158407#276158407It's quite possible it may be as anotherpaul's has indicated by reference. According Nestle and Aland there are no known extant manuscripts prior to the 4th century for the last 2 books of Matthew. Tradition and zealous scribes may account for theSun, 01 Mar 2009 20:35:04 -0600Greetings everyone,The only reason I am posting here is that this thread is at the top of the page, and I most likely will get a response.I had someone that I think is a brother post a message on my profile page. His screen name is carlos_erty. He sahttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=276018646#276018646Greetings everyone,The only reason I am posting here is that this thread is at the top of the page, and I most likely will get a response.I had someone that I think is a brother post a message on my profile page. His screen name is carlos_erty. He saSat, 28 Feb 2009 23:27:34 -0600It is also possible that Matt 28 ghas ben altered by Trinitarians. html_removedhtml_removedhtml_removedhtml_removedEusebius the church historian had in his library a copy of Matthew in Hebrew, which Jerome mentions as having seen. Eusebius until, thttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=275992096#275992096It is also possible that Matt 28 ghas ben altered by Trinitarians. html_removedhtml_removedhtml_removedhtml_removedEusebius the church historian had in his library a copy of Matthew in Hebrew, which Jerome mentions as having seen. Eusebius until, tSat, 28 Feb 2009 20:31:18 -0600Here is some info I have.http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=275990756#275990756Here is some info I have.Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:22:54 -0600Random people keep sending me emails about this verse. Since I no longer have to Watchtower Lib (new computer), I'm gonna need some assistance. Everyone is familiar with this common remark about being baptised in the name of the father and the son anhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43861/13881993/Matthew_28:19?post_id=275912853#275912853Random people keep sending me emails about this verse. Since I no longer have to Watchtower Lib (new computer), I'm gonna need some assistance. Everyone is familiar with this common remark about being baptised in the name of the father and the son anSat, 28 Feb 2009 13:12:00 -0600