New Posts For Thread: God is ONE, and not threehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_threeBs'dThe Bible teaches that God is ONE. NOWHERE does the Bible teach that God is three. So that's knocks off the trinity dogma. God is one is not compatible with God is three."Hear Israel, Y-H-W-H is our God, Y-H-W-H is ONE!" Deut 6:4"Listen, IsThe above quotations [§] and [&], both from Adelphe's post #85, are, indeed, in conformity, respectively, with items no. 2. and no. 3. of the real evidence, as presented by MdS at post #90.Now, by comparing her own "quotation" [§] of MdS' whttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520622647#520622647The above quotations [§] and [&], both from Adelphe's post #85, are, indeed, in conformity, respectively, with items no. 2. and no. 3. of the real evidence, as presented by MdS at post #90.Now, by comparing her own "quotation" [§] of MdS' wSat, 09 Jun 2012 05:07:48 -0500The above quotations [§] and [&], both from Adelphe's post #85, are, indeed, in conformity, respectively, with items no. 2. and no. 3. of the real evidence, as presented by MdS at post #90.Now, by comparing her own "quotation" [§] of MdS' whttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520622351#520622351The above quotations [§] and [&], both from Adelphe's post #85, are, indeed, in conformity, respectively, with items no. 2. and no. 3. of the real evidence, as presented by MdS at post #90.Now, by comparing her own "quotation" [§] of MdS' wSat, 09 Jun 2012 04:50:27 -0500Excuse me?Your words, copied directly from #84: Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God,http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520621571#520621571Excuse me?Your words, copied directly from #84: Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God,Sat, 09 Jun 2012 04:09:17 -0500Excuse me?Your words, copied directly from #84: Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God,http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520621205#520621205Excuse me?Your words, copied directly from #84: Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God,Sat, 09 Jun 2012 03:48:35 -0500Excuse me?Your words, copied directly from #84: Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God,http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520612385#520612385Excuse me?Your words, copied directly from #84: Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God,Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:39:47 -0500I didn't "abusively add" anything to your phrase. I adopted it as my own in my own response, and made several changes like "more" to Christian (it certainly is for orthodoxy), "AND [more] compatible with explicit and implicit affirmations of Deity"http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520597771#520597771I didn't "abusively add" anything to your phrase. I adopted it as my own in my own response, and made several changes like "more" to Christian (it certainly is for orthodoxy), "AND [more] compatible with explicit and implicit affirmations of Deity"Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:08:34 -0500I didn't "abusively add" anything to your phrase. I adopted it as my own in my own response, and made several changes like "more" to Christian (it certainly is for othodoxy), "AND [more] compatible with explicit and implicit affirmations of Deity" (http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520585527#520585527I didn't "abusively add" anything to your phrase. I adopted it as my own in my own response, and made several changes like "more" to Christian (it certainly is for othodoxy), "AND [more] compatible with explicit and implicit affirmations of Deity" (Fri, 08 Jun 2012 07:00:20 -0500Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God, the Father Almighty: ...[/quote]And of course yohttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520496259#520496259Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, gets his authority "on earth" from God, the Father Almighty: ...[/quote]And of course yoTue, 05 Jun 2012 15:30:56 -0500And of course you ignore (or prefer to ignore) the more perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable, AND compatible with explicit and implicit affirmations of Deity, explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, has intrinisic authorityhttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520475767#520475767And of course you ignore (or prefer to ignore) the more perfectly Christian, perfectly logical, exegetically impeccable, AND compatible with explicit and implicit affirmations of Deity, explanation that Jesus, the Son of Man, has intrinisic authorityTue, 05 Jun 2012 08:17:40 -0500Because it's not. The necessary conclusion one is to draw is that He is God on earth. No one but God can forgive sins exactly as the scribes correctly observed.[/quote]Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, pehttp://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29149871/God_is_ONE,_and_not_three?post_id=520474891#520474891Because it's not. The necessary conclusion one is to draw is that He is God on earth. No one but God can forgive sins exactly as the scribes correctly observed.[/quote]Of course the lady ignores (or prefers to ignore ...) the perfectly Christian, peTue, 05 Jun 2012 07:57:49 -0500