<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Do we pray to same God?</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God</link><description>Hi, I am posting this on the DJ, DI and DC boards because I want to know what people think about this guys' theory.   Personally, I have also thought that Islam is closer to Judaism because of its strict and uncompromising monotheism, its community s</description><item><title>Seefan...it takes more than that. Rev 19:13.He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God.[/quote]Well 57 I have to say you certainly are persistence!  Not that I&#x92;m that well versed but let&#x92;s look at Re</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519517111#519517111</link><description>Seefan...it takes more than that. Rev 19:13.He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God.[/quote]Well 57 I have to say you certainly are persistence!  Not that I&#x92;m that well versed but let&#x92;s look at Re</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:37:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Better still where does it say God can?</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519516967#519516967</link><description>Better still where does it say God can?</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:32:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sefan,When will you show us that Jesus...A.K.A., the Word that became flesh was created. Also, where does the bible say God can't empty himself  and take on the form of a man?</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519513603#519513603</link><description>Sefan,When will you show us that Jesus...A.K.A., the Word that became flesh was created. Also, where does the bible say God can't empty himself  and take on the form of a man?</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:28:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Logos will never be done justice with a three line definition.  It has a very heavy, deep, and nuanced definition at least as it pertains to the incarnation.I noticed the words you emphasized above.  The word you should have seized upon was "expr</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519513475#519513475</link><description>The Logos will never be done justice with a three line definition.  It has a very heavy, deep, and nuanced definition at least as it pertains to the incarnation.I noticed the words you emphasized above.  The word you should have seized upon was "expr</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:23:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The light is an analogy.  Jesus is not photons.  Light is Truth, God himself.  Not the substance between God and man as in the sunlight.God is not Truth!  Truth is a quality of God ...The Expression of God is God.  You're are using a colloquial use o</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519513439#519513439</link><description>The light is an analogy.  Jesus is not photons.  Light is Truth, God himself.  Not the substance between God and man as in the sunlight.God is not Truth!  Truth is a quality of God ...The Expression of God is God.  You're are using a colloquial use o</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:22:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No one is stripping Jesus of anything but making His station clearer to those who don't understand.  You seem to like Strong's dictionary so I'll post what it says for your consideration: 3056 l&oacute;gos (from 3004 /l&eacute;g&Aring;&#x8D;, "speaking to a con</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519513397#519513397</link><description>No one is stripping Jesus of anything but making His station clearer to those who don't understand.  You seem to like Strong's dictionary so I'll post what it says for your consideration: 3056 l&oacute;gos (from 3004 /l&eacute;g&Aring;&#x8D;, "speaking to a con</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:20:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The light is an analogy.  Jesus is not photons.  Light is Truth, God himself.  Not the substance between God and man as in the sunlight.The Expression of God is God.  You're are using a colloquial use of the word expression, and I'm using a more etym</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519512501#519512501</link><description>The light is an analogy.  Jesus is not photons.  Light is Truth, God himself.  Not the substance between God and man as in the sunlight.The Expression of God is God.  You're are using a colloquial use of the word expression, and I'm using a more etym</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 16:49:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Logos will never be done justice with a three line definition.  It has a very heavy, deep, and nuanced definition at least as it pertains to the incarnation.I noticed the words you emphasized above.  The word you should have seized upon was "expr</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519511081#519511081</link><description>The Logos will never be done justice with a three line definition.  It has a very heavy, deep, and nuanced definition at least as it pertains to the incarnation.I noticed the words you emphasized above.  The word you should have seized upon was "expr</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 16:10:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Logos will never be done justice with a three line definition.  It has a very heavy, deep, and nuanced definition at least as it pertains to the incarnation.I noticed the words you emphasized above.  The word you should have seized upon was "expr</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519509475#519509475</link><description>The Logos will never be done justice with a three line definition.  It has a very heavy, deep, and nuanced definition at least as it pertains to the incarnation.I noticed the words you emphasized above.  The word you should have seized upon was "expr</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:30:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No one is stripping Jesus of anything but making His station clearer to those who don't understand.  You seem to like Strong's dictionary so I'll post what it says for your consideration: 3056 l&oacute;gos (from 3004 /l&eacute;g&Aring;&#x8D;, "speaking to a con</title><link>http://community.beliefnet.com/go/thread/view/43851/29089977/Do_we_pray_to_same_God?post_id=519508273#519508273</link><description>No one is stripping Jesus of anything but making His station clearer to those who don't understand.  You seem to like Strong's dictionary so I'll post what it says for your consideration: 3056 l&oacute;gos (from 3004 /l&eacute;g&Aring;&#x8D;, "speaking to a con</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:58:10 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
